Parkland Crisis Actors are Also Top Trolls in It for the Keks

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
March 8, 2018

If these girls weren’t so fat and ugly, they could be on the Disney Channel.

The media is still in total damage control mode after their “think of the children” crisis actor hoax blew up in their faces. They are still trying to meme these disgusting fake children as the face of whatever – taking your guns away, mainly.

They are now stooping to a new low and claiming that they are brilliant trolls who beat all of their opponents on Twitter. This of course is not fair, because weev, myself and every other efficient troll on Twitter is already banned.

I can promise you we could make these dumb whore actresses ragequit.

We are the best there ever was.

Fat coward Geoffrey A. Fowler writes for Washington Post:

In person, Sarah Chadwick and Jaclyn Corin are fierce. And young.

Meeting Sunday outside the Yogurtology shop two blocks from Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, these two mass shooting survivors wore matching gym shorts and lanyards. Chadwick’s had a koala clipped on.

I don’t mean to diminish them. I’m actually star-struck: These students have channeled a personal hell into one of the most potent online forces since @realDonaldTrump. Never before have survivors of gun violence stayed on the national agenda for so long.

But it’s easy to forget they’re children, waging battle in some of the nastiest corners of the Internet even while they process a trauma. That’s what makes them so effective — and also especially vulnerable.

You might know Chadwick, 16, as the Parkland kid who tweeted expletives at the president and deftly deflects attacks from politicians, gun-rights partisans, crazies and media personalities who don’t have qualms about picking on kids.

Yeah, that right there is what pissed everyone off to the point where they just dismissed these kids as CIA blackops agents: this idea that they are allowed to tweet expletives at the president, to push a hyper-controversial far-left agenda, but anyone who responds to it is “picking on kids.”

If the media hadn’t framed it that way, maybe they wouldn’t have been accused of being crisis actors.

What makes Chadwick and Corin interesting to a tech columnist is that in the wake of terror, they ran headfirst to a particularly treacherous online space: Twitter. It’s so nasty that even well-paid, grown-up celebrities such as Leslie Jones and Lena Dunham have decided to step away. On Twitter, Parkland kids have been called “crisis actors” and made pawns in conspiracy theories. They’ve been told they aren’t grieving properly. They’ve been threatened.

It isn’t even a conspiracy theory, guy. It’s just obviously what’s happening.

The idea that the shooting was a hoax and the feds let it happen is a theory, but the fact that the media rushed in and someone coached these kids about how to present a political agenda – how to put on an act after a crisis – is simply what happened. The whole world saw it.

They are crisis actors.

There is no one correct way to respond to trauma. But what made these students turn to social media?

“After everything happened, the world wanted to put us in a bubble and keep us away from everything. But no, we popped the bubble,” Chadwick said. “It’s scary, for sure, because of all the attention we’re getting. But it has to be done because who else is going to do it?”

The Parkland kids are rising to the occasion because they have to and because they have the skills. The Columbine High School shooting took place before social media, and the Sandy Hook survivors were too young.

“We’ve had iPhones since we were out of elementary school,” Corin said.

These kids are also from a tight-knit community, affluent and smart. Corin uses rhetorical strategies from AP English class to pack tweets with maximum punch.

I don’t believe they are writing their own tweets, either.

Why Twitter, as opposed to Facebook, Instagram or Snapchat? “I don’t even have a Facebook or know how to use it,” Chadwick said. And besides, they wanted to be someplace where both young people and adults might notice. Twitter is designed for spreading information — and getting into fights.

Not anymore.

Not all teenagers are on Twitter, or expert at using its public soap box. But Chadwick had experience tweeting about celebrities, sharing “meme” videos and images, and getting into squabbles about politics. Corin set up a personal Twitter account after classmate Cameron Kasky created the #NeverAgain hashtag and asked her to help him build a movement.

Regardless of your view on gun control, it’s clear the Parkland students have been successful at drawing attention to it. I asked marketing analytics firm Crimson Hexagon to analyze the tweets and conversations related to a dozen Parkland students and group accounts. Compared to a list of the top dozen other Twitter influencers on guns (minus President Trump), the Parkland students have produced 8.7 times the volume of online conversation than the celebrities.

Yeah dude.

Most people are just following them because they figured out they’re actors and they’re trying to figure out what kind of fuck-up CIA black-op is being foisted upon us.

Chadwick said they’re effective because they’re from a community she calls “young Twitter.” To them, Twitter is high school. “The politicians like Marco Rubio, they’re the mean girls,” Corin says.

In young Twitter, you deal with a troll by trolling them back. Attacked for smiling too much on a TV appearance, Chadwick replied, “You are a piece of hot garbage, and I hope you step on a lego.”

Not that right there is some real shit-tier bantz. By far the worst I’ve ever even seen.

The initial comment about smiling is also shit – I would have started out with a solid “you only took this crisis acting job because you’re too fat and ugly for Harvey to let you suck him” intro and then taken it from there.

If I wasn’t banned. 

What’s been her most effective tweet? Chadwick dug around her phone and pulled up one that reads, simply: “I’m a junior.”

Those three words received nearly 350,000 likes, about three times recent popular posts by Trump.

That’s because all of Trump’s followers are banned, you weasel.

This whole shit appears to be just as much about reviving Twitter as a relevant platform as it is about taking our guns.

Her tweet was a troll on Laura Ingraham, the conservative radio and Fox News host who had attempted her own troll on Chadwick by quoting her as an example of “HOW TEENS SPEAK TO AND ABT ADULTS.” But in her tweet, Ingraham misidentified Chadwick as a sophomore.

Ingraham, author of “Of Thee I Zing,” was out-zinged by a factual correction from a child.

I’m not actually sure that is what happened there, fellow, but you’re right: Laura Ingram should hire me as her social media manager.

Because I would have said: “I’ll bet you like Junior Bacon Cheeseburgers, you sow.”

But, wait a minute: Why was a 16-year-old in a position to be attacked in the first place?

Because she is trying to force a radical political agenda down people’s throats, and they don’t like it.

Fellow student leader David Hogg has been repeatedly called out by Infowars’ Alex Jones.

“These students have been pushing back in ways that are admirable and surprising. The fact that they have to deal with so much speaks to what a mess social media is,” said Whitney Phillips, a professor at Mercer University who has studied online trolls.

You see what they’re trying to do here?

“People should be able to shove a radical anti-white political agenda down the throat of America without being questioned.”

And of course, if they had already fully cleansed social media and these Disney Channel rejects weren’t getting this pushback, they would have been able to say “look, everyone on social media agrees with us and they want their guns taken from them.”

Maybe, Phillips said, we ought to be talking about why Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and other tech companies expose people to so much hate. Or how trolls have no problem attacking children. Or how the press fueled their fame and turned them into targets.

“All that gets obscured when we focus on how badass they are,” Phillips said.

Their asses are not “bad,” they are fat.

The Parkland shooting survivors are children. Remember that when they go viral.
This week @washingtonpost, I went to Stoneman Douglas and spoke w 2 students who’ve become Twitter stars about happens when kids to do battle in nasty corners of the Internet: https://t.co/rJbcjyo83w pic.twitter.com/20dEzrzp1Y

— Geoffrey A. Fowler (@geoffreyfowler) March 8, 2018

 

But I’m not allowed to inform them of this issue, because I’m banned.

There are pressures we can’t see from afar. The kids say they write their own Tweets, though they sometimes run language past each other in a group chat. (They’ve hired public relations firm 42 West to help manage media inquiries.)

Bullshit.

For Corin, it has affected her personal relationships. “I have lost a few close friends who feel like we are doing this for personal gain or attention,” she said.

Oh yeah? Hm. I wonder what ever could have given them that impression.

And nobody knows what the impact is of having thousands of strangers come after you because you survived a mass shooting.

Yeah, you rat fuck.

Strangers came after them because they survived a shooting.

Nothing to do with trying to steal everyone’s guns.

“The worst ones to me are the people who don’t even believe the shooting happened,” Chadwick said. “I turned off my DMs [direct messages] on Twitter for that reason.”

She continued: “Or when people accuse us of having an agenda. Did we have a political agenda before this? No. Honestly, I would give anything for this to have never happened.”

Then there’s the violent threats. Their parents, who Corin said are keeping out of the spotlight at the insistence of their children, now track their online activity — but what can they do? Corin says her father scours Twitter for threats, and has asked her to not go out alone.

What’s Twitter’s responsibility to the kids? Its executives certainly like to take credit for the service’s positive social impact. After the Parkland shooting, it verified the student accounts, giving them a blue check mark usually reserved for celebrities, politicians and journalists. It also says it brought in a “swarm” of resources to remove abusive tweets and delete spam accounts targeting the children, though it wouldn’t say how many messages or accounts it has blocked. Its policies don’t give members under 18 special consideration.

SEE.

The gun grab failed because everyone was like “THIS IS A CIA BLACK-OP TO TAKE OUR GUNS,” so now they’re like “oh yeah sure, but we should censor the internet more tho.”

Twitter’s CEO Jack Dorsey, who has been retweeting some of the Parkland students, last week launched a new effort to make the service less toxic. That isn’t an easy problem to solve in balance with free speech — and it’s turning into a major liability for Silicon Valley giants.

There isn’t any “free speech,” which is why it is a problem.

If there was free speech, @jack could just say “yeah, my hands are tied.” But because he’s already censored people, now they can say “oh you censored someone for saying a black person looked like an ape but you won’t censor this guy calling a fat girl a crisis actor???”

Hogg, who was the target of a YouTube conspiracy claiming he was a paid actor, told my Post colleague even he wouldn’t want to “censor” anyone. “They only way that we are going to prove that we’re not actors is to let them say what they want,” he said.

LOL

David Hogg’s entire life is now about trying to prove that he isn’t a crisis actor.

It is his one goal.

The whole “take their guns” thing is finished, now he just has to prove he’s a real person.

The Parkland students and their supporters might think they’re winning. But it really is a matter of perspective. People who don’t believe the school shooting ever happened think the kids are losing.

By the way, although I am not fully on-board with the conspiracies, I have to white knight for them here: very few people are claiming that the shooting didn’t actually happen. Most are claiming that the FBI and the cops knew Cruz was insane and let it happen on purpose. Some others are saying Cruz, who had a history of making these insane statements on the internet and interacting with the cops, was drugged and dropped off at the school while a CIA sniper killed the kids.

Very few think the murders didn’t really happen.

The same tech that makes Twitter an unprecedented platform for these teens also makes it an potent weapon for harassment.

“We are not going to give up this platform,” Corin said.

It doesn’t help to patronize young people, who are savvier at using the Internet than any generation before. But we adults should be wrestling with the consequences of the online world we’ve created — especially if we’re sending children into battle there.

You’re the ones sending children into battle, because you’re the ones who have to use an emotional narrative to push through your anti-American agenda.

The NRA doesn’t send out kids who were saved because someone had a gun to shill for gun rights.

But I think maybe they should.