Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
July 2, 2017
Most TV journalists are whacked out of their gourds.
They are extremely weird people, and though we are seeing some of this poke out on their shows now, it was typically covered up by the fact that the shows were so heavily produced, with scripted reports and even scripted dialogue between hosts. During interviews, they are drilled by producers to keep to very strict talking points. Effectively, they are no different than soap opera or sitcom actors.
There is a difference though in how they approach the acting roles. Because there is an explicit pretense of this being somehow something other than acting, the actors are prone to engage in method acting.
Method actors take on the role of the character they are playing in their personal lives. They “become” the character. While Hollywood actors who claimed to be doing this may have just been saying they were doing it in order to seem interesting and unique, most television journalists are doing this, and have gotten lost in the role (like Heath Ledger did with Joker, leading to his death). They lose awareness of the fact that they are simply actors being paid to read scripted lies.
Given all of this, it isn’t a surprise that CNN host Brian Stelter writes an email news letter that reads like something from a gang-stalking support forum.
No producer for the news letter.
This is a passage from this week’s edition. Emphasis is his.
“Pro-journalism” and “anti-journalism”
Here’s what I see: a divide between “pro-journalism” and “anti-journalism.” People on the left, right and in-between who are pro-J recognize that most journalists try to be fair and right. Accuracy and credibility are our currencies. Checks and balances and layers of editing are guardrails. When screw-ups happen, corrections are made and lessons are learned. Newsrooms are imperfect but hopefully improving all the time. Media critics and persnickety readers and sharp-elbowed competitors all play an accountability role.
The consensus pro-J view, as far as I can tell, is that CNN made mistakes with this Russia-related story last week; that the company took serious action as a result; and that it hopefully will learn from this affair.
But there’s an alternative view, popular on partisan web sites and social media, that is straight-up “anti-journalism.” These activists and commenters don’t promote accountability, they promote resentment and hatred. They claim that most, if not all, journalists have sinister agendas… that newsrooms are occupied by “enemies of the people…” and that the evil “MSM” is propaganda. These anti-J people claim that reporters routinely cover up good news and invent bad news. I’ve noticed a disturbing increase in terrorist lingo, like “CNN is ISIS,” a phrase promoted by Alex Jones. This Tuesday night Breitbart story also invokes CNN and ISIS in the same sentence.
Some of this “anti-journalism” spin isn’t about eradicating bias or improving news coverage, it’s about trying to stamp out reporting altogether. It’s nutty, but it’s insidious, and that’s why I’m bringing it up. Millions of Americans are exposed to these extreme views every single day through social media…
Now that – is a wacky few paragraphs.
Stelter has no idea what journalists think, as he is not a journalist, even by the modern definition of the term. His only role is to read scripts on television, which he himself does not write.
For the record, I didn’t think “CNN is ISIS” was a very good meme, just as I never thought that any of Alex Jones’ forced memes were very good. However, this meme really seems to sting. I’m not going to start using it because I think it sucks, just like I think O’Keefe’s “CNN is Pravda” meme sucks, but the former is certainly getting a rise out of them.
Interesting note here: Alex Jones is suffering from a type of method actor syndrome as well, though his is much more creative and much less dangerous than that of the MSM. I don’t know exactly what is going through Alex Jones’ head, but it is clear that it is more than “I’m up here to entertain people and talk them into buying dick juice and water filters.”
The fact that both the TV actors and the print media liars are now teaming up to adopt a victimhood identity is fascinating and bizarre. Jeffrey Goldberg, the Jewish Editor in Chief of The Atlantic, recently pushed this to the extreme, claiming that Trump was trying to incite violence against journalists by pointing out when they’re lying. Presumably, people will start killing journalists at some point. I disavow, I disavow, blah blah blah, but that has become inevitable at this point. They are just making people so angry with this creation of a false reality.
By creating this false reality and layering lies upon lies, the fake news media – which I sometimes call the “very fake news media” – is inducing mass psychosis, by creating a situation where people are incapable of distinguishing fact from fiction. Surely, people who realize this has been done to them on purpose are going to become agitated, and when you’re engaging in the wanton and reckless mass-agitation of the entire population, you’re going to have a lot of very angry people, some of whom will eventually become unglued.
Obviously – or at least it is obvious to me, perhaps not to those unfamiliar with the way the Jews work – Goldberg was throwing this out there because he knows it’s inevitable, and wanted to be on the record preemptively blaming Trump for it.
For the record, I have no proof that Stelter is Jewish. He claims to have been raised methodist, though he is married to a Jewess, and they had a Jewish wedding ceremony (which strongly implies that he is a racial Jew whose parents converted to Christianity for some reason, probably financial). But here on the Daily Stormer, we report real news, and don’t call people Jews without hard documentation. We won’t claim a person is a Jew simply because they act and/or look Jewish.
However, he does act and look extremely Jewish.
Also, Megyn [sic] Kelly
The “but this is all real” syndrome hit Megyn [sic] Kelly hard when she moved from Fox News to NBC.
She was hired by Fox because she had legs that went all the way up and Aryan Master Race facial symmetry.
She got in way over her head with both Vladimir Putin and Alex Jones. And whoever hired her was also apparently in way over their own head. They somehow thought they could send Kelly alone to Moscow and Austin to men who have spent their entire lives dealing with the media and come out on top.
Putin just made her look absurd to the point where from a 90 minute interview they could only use 4 minutes. They even had to add narration between what he said and saying he was an evil liar. And Jones planned from the beginning to abuse this poor bitch. He knew she was doing a hit piece – what else would she be doing? – so he secretly recorded her on the phone saying she wasn’t going to do a hit piece, then recorded the interview itself with his own cameras and published it all and let the audience compare it with the version shown on TV.
Not really sure how that can be called dishonest. He simply acted like he didn’t know she was doing a hit piece. The mainstream is just so used to functioning as a filter, where they selectively choose what the people are allowed to see. They are not accustomed to dealing with transparency.
Those were both brutal debacles. I haven’t even heard anything about the third episode. They might have canceled the show.
I half-expected the next episode to be “this week, Megyn flies to Manila to get raped at gunpoint by Rody Duterte before heading to Vegas for a bare-knuckles boxing match with Floyd Mayweather, Jr.” – the theme would be “blonde bimbo brutally humiliated.”
We live in extreme times, and the entire concept of television “journalists” and the way they are inserted into the narrative of investigative journalism is ultra-goofy.