Pax Sino: Hamas and Fatah Among 14 Palestinian Factions to Sign Unity Agreement in China!

This is absolutely huge!
On Tuesday, representatives of 🇵🇸14 Palestinian factions, including Fatah and Hamas, pledged to end their divisions and strengthen Palestinian unity by signing the Beijing Declaration.

The announcement was made after a three-day reconciliation dialogue… pic.twitter.com/1t4tHUYncC

— Li Jingjing 李菁菁 (@Jingjing_Li) July 23, 2024

Earlier today I published an article about how China is beating Western companies in developing consumer technology. The tech space is the most obvious place you can look to see where things are headed in the future, because that is a space that has been dominated by America (and American allies, such as Japan and Korea) for a long time, and it is now beyond debate that China is going to bury their competitors.

But China is also going around the world making peace deals between groups that the US wants to be at war with each other.

US Middle East policy was based around war between Iran and Saudi Arabia, then all of a sudden in March of 2023, China made a surprise announcement that they’d brokered a peace deal altering a decades-long status of continual conflict engineered by the US. It’s yet to be seen if that peace will hold, but we know it ended Saudi involvement in Yemen.

Now they make this surprise announcement.

CNN:

Palestinian factions including rivals Hamas and Fatah have signed an agreement on “ending division and strengthening Palestinian unity” in Beijing, China said Tuesday.

The announcement followed reconciliation talks hosted by China involving 14 Palestinian factions starting Sunday, according to China’s Foreign Ministry, which come as Israel wages war against militant group Hamas in Gaza and as Beijing has sought to present itself as a potential peace broker in the conflict.

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said the agreement was “dedicated to the great reconciliation and unity of all 14 factions.”

“The core outcome is that the PLO (Palestine Liberation Organization) is the sole legitimate representative of all Palestinian people,” Wang said, adding that “an agreement has been reached on post-Gaza war governance and the establishment of a provisional national reconciliation government.”

We don’t know the details yet, but I will tell you this: it was not Hamas that folded. Hamas no doubt offered concessions, but the only way they would agree to respect PLO/PA/Fatah authority is if the PLO agreed to their platform of resistance against the Jews.

It was unclear from Wang’s comments what role Hamas, which is not part of the PLO, would play in such an arrangement, or what the immediate impact of any deal would be. The talks were held as the future governance of Palestinian territories remains in question following Israel’s repeated vow to eradicate Hamas in response to the group’s October 7 terrorist attack on its territory.

The PLO is a coalition of parties that signed a peace treaty with Israel in 1993, and formed a new government in the Palestinian Authority (PA).

Fatah dominates both the PLO and the PA, the interim Palestinian government that was established in the Israeli-occupied West Bank after the 1993 agreement known as the Oslo Accords was signed. Hamas was not party to the accords and does not recognize Israel.

Mustafa Barghouti, president of the Palestinian National Initiative, who was at the Beijing talks, said “all the parties” have agreed that they should join the PLO, and that the organization is the only legitimate representative of the Palestinians.

You see: the Chinese are the good guys.

Mahmoud al-Aloul, Vice Chairman of the Central Committee of Fatah, China’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi, and Mussa Abu Marzuk, a senior member of Hamas, in Beijing on July 23, 2024.

While the Chinese are unifying the Palestinians around the common purpose of forming a coherent state, the Americans are paying the blood-sucking Jews to mass-murder children. The rumor is, Donald Trump has made a deal to end the goal of a two-state solution and give Israel permission to ethnically cleanse not only Gaza, but the West Bank as well.

One thing is for sure: the Adelson woman didn’t give Trump $100 million because she likes his charming smile and dashing ear bandage.

Why are the Chinese the Good Guy?

Dishonest critics of my positions will claim I am promoting subservience to the Chinese, or that I am claiming we should “adopt the Chinese system,” or that I am claiming the Chinese are saviors. I’m not saying any of those things, but it seems none of the critics want to look at what I am actually saying, and instead prefer to distort my positions and then attack the distortions. (It is also possible that many of my critics are simply stupid, and are legitimately incapable of grasping what I am saying.)

The Chinese are the good guys, but it’s important to note that they are not the good guys because they want to do charity for the world out of some spirit of niceness. It is a uniquely Western idea that a government would go around the world trying to help people out of the kindness of their hearts.

And we can all see that while the people in the US and EU are constantly talking about how good and moral they are and how they are on a mission to bring “democracy” and “human rights” to everyone on earth, the actual results are endless war and ridiculous poverty. They also bully people, because they claim they have established a universal moral order (based on nothing, by the way).

We can see, pretty clearly, that while some people might be stupid enough to believe that the Western governments are on a mission of love, this stance of “we are the most moral people in the world” is just a cover for corruption and violence.

Personal charity is a good thing and it’s actually a Christian moral directive. It’s good to help people when you can. It’s good to give a bit of money to someone who is struggling, if they’re not just going to buy drugs with it.

Organized charity, however, is virtually alway a gigantic scam. I’ve written in some detail about the foreign adoption scam, where these groups (usually branded as evangelical Christians) go around the Third World buying babies from their mothers to sell for a profit in the US. There are a few good books on this (I recommend “The Child Catchers: Rescue, Trafficking, and the New Gospel of Adoption” by Kathryn Joyce, if anyone is interested in the topic – it’s sort of fascinating). Christian “adoption” agencies being literal human trafficking rackets is one of the more extreme examples of charity organizations being a scam, but they’re all basically like this, including the environmentalist groups.

When you have national governments claiming that their purpose is organized international charity, that is really obviously a scam. We know it’s a scam because we can see all these people do is start wars and sanction countries into oblivion. “Foreign aid” is a bribery scheme to pay off a group of criminals in a foreign government so they serve the interests of the US Empire. These interests include both military interests as well as agreements to sell off a nation’s natural resources to Western companies. No country’s economy has ever gotten better because they received foreign aid any more than a junkie has ever gotten clean because the government gave him clean needles.

China does not claim to be doing any of this for charity purposes. They don’t make claims to be ultra moral people going around saving the world from itself. The basic Chinese premise is that both war and interfering in another country’s domestic affairs through other means are both bad for business.

The Chinese vision of the future is one where peace is based on trade rather than enforced through violence. It’s also a future where a nation-state can make its own decisions about its internal affairs, because meddling in other people’s affairs is destabilizing and ultimately a form of warfare that often or even usually leads to violent warfare. The Ukraine is the perfect example: the US/Europe went in and did a revolution to overthrow the elected government in 2014, and this eventually led to a war. The Chinese policy is “everyone just relax, we’re going to sell you high-quality products at reasonable prices.”

The Chinese Have Literally No Reason to Do War

It’s important, as I said above, to remove morality from this whole analysis. So then, someone will ask: if the Chinese are going to be the dominant world power, why wouldn’t they use violence against other nations?

The answer is because they would have no reason to. If global markets are open and they are making money, what purpose would they have in doing violence? The only theoretical reason I could think of is that if someone tried to close their market to the Chinese, they would want the market open, and therefore could use violence to do that. However, work that through: the model is based on openness and trust between nations, so if other nations saw the Chinese invading another nation, it would reduce trust, which could cause other nations to close up.

There is currently no country that has a good reason to completely close their market to the Chinese, but if a few nations decided to do that, it would not mean much, as all other nations would still be open, and reintroducing war could not possibly be worth the cost.

The Chinese are not a martial people, they are a mercantile people, and their entire view of international relations is based around trade. This is an ancient historical matter. But it is also relevant today, because in the current world, there is not a need for expanded living space. The Chinese and a lot of other people like living in super-densely populated urban areas, and modern shipping technology allows for food to move all around the world. China buys a lot of pork from the US. They are not going to invade the US to take over the pork farms given that they can just buy the pork, while selling the US electric cars and cellphones.

I like a lot of what John Mearsheimer says, but his narrative about China having some secret plan to transit into a global military power is completely baseless. He’s been making this claim for years, and China has not done this. I’ve been promoting this idea of Pax Sino for probably 6-7 years, and during that period, Mearsheimer has been claiming they were going to militarize. My theory has been predictive, while his has not been. They have not militarized significantly; instead they’ve used resources to strengthen trade and now they are involved in global peace projects.

The last time China was involved in a war was in 1979 when they sent troops to Cambodia to protect the Cambodians from a Vietnamese invasion. Think about that. How many wars and interventions has the US done since 1979?

I’ve actually argued that the Chinese should send troops to Burma (Myanmar), because by all accounts that would make good sense, given that Burma is a strong Chinese ally being bullied by US-backed terrorists. But the Chinese just don’t do this sort of thing, and they don’t want to start doing it.

Sino-Futurism (AKA Pax Sino) Isn’t Perfect

I’m not going to claim that the Chinese model is a perfect future for the world, but it’s just an obvious fact that it is six million times better than what we have now.

The Chinese idea is very much based on consumerism, which I’m not sure is the best thing for mankind. I’m actually sure it isn’t the best thing for mankind. Some of these technological products have made our lives better, but a lot of them have made our lives worse, and “just buy infinity stuff” is not a path to human happiness.

However, given that avoiding war and allowing for national independence is a key part of the Chinese plan, no one is going to be forced to base their society around consumerism. China is doing deals with the Taliban, who obviously have an alternative model of living that is not based on consumerism, but rather on faith and family. But they still need money, and there are still products they can use, even if they choose to continue living in caves. (They probably will stay in the caves, because a big part of their understanding of Islam is based on rejection of luxury. They’re a bit similar to the Amish in this way. But the Amish do business. The Chinese would do business with the Amish. They don’t care.)

There are other problems that I’m willing to discuss. Obviously, I am a shill for the Chinese, but I’m not paid and I don’t need to claim that this is going to be a perfect future. But it is the inevitable future, and it is much better than what we have now. All of these weird social issues in the West are going to evaporate, because it is all unnatural and forced on us by this corrupt globalist system. The problems that will come up are problems that we can deal with.

It’s in a way sad that white people won’t rule the world anymore. But we haven’t been ruling the world in a long time anyway. We surrendered that power to the Jews, and it’s been a complete disaster, and now it’s collapsing and the Chinese are taking over. It’s not going to be a perfect world, but it’s going to be a much better world, where we can determine our own futures in our own nations instead of having something forced on us by an elitist global criminal cartel.

To be Perfectly Clear

I want what’s best for white people, for Christendom. If I didn’t believe that Pax Sino was the best thing for my people, I would not be promoting it.

I am completely open to debate and discussion on this topic, which is not the case for people promoting Pax Americana. Those people are obsessed with censorship and forcing their agenda on others.

In the short term, things are not looking good for white people. But in the long term and even really the medium term, things are looking up. If I didn’t believe that, I would not say it.