Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
April 11, 2017
It was obviously a false flag.
You’re just not allowed to say that. Even if you’re a brown-skinned Democrat, they will crucify you.
Putin will say it though.
He dgaf.
RT:
Russia has information of a possible incident similar to the one in Idlib province, possibly targeting a Damascus suburb, President Vladimir Putin says. The US accused Damascus of using chemical weapons in Idlib province, which Syria denied.
“We have reports from multiple sources that false flags like this one – and I cannot call it otherwise – are being prepared in other parts of Syria, including the southern suburbs of Damascus. They plan to plant some chemical there and accuse the Syrian government of an attack,” he said at a joint press conference with Italian President Sergio Mattarella in Moscow.
The incident has not been properly investigated as yet, but the US fired dozens of cruise missiles at a Syrian airbase in a demonstration of force over what it labeled a chemical attack by Damascus.
“President Mattarella and I discussed it, and I told him that this reminds me strongly of the events in 2003, when the US representatives demonstrated at the UN Security Council session the presumed chemical weapons found in Iraq. The military campaign was subsequently launched in Iraq and it ended with the devastation of the country, the growth of the terrorist threat and the appearance of Islamic State [IS, formerly ISIS] on the world stage,” he added.
Yeah, you mean a brown-skinned Republican using an emotionally-charged prop to demand something insane based on obviously nonsensical claims.
Definitely similar.
A separate report of a potential false flag operation in Syria came from the Russian General Staff, which said militants were transporting toxic agents into several parts of Syria.
It was the first time the US had targeted Syrian troops deliberately. The White House says it will repeat military action in response to any possible new chemical weapon attacks.
“The sight of people being gassed and blown away by barrel bombs ensures that if we see this kind of action again, we hold open the possibility of future action,” spokesman Sean Spicer said Monday.
So, is the Trump administration going to respond to this?
This leader of a superpower asserting that this was a hoax designed to get the US involved in the war, and the US responded to it by getting involved in the war.
Surely, this at the very least needs to be addressed, no?
Especially given these factors:
- Putin says they are planning more gas false flags
- The US says they will attack if anyone is gassed
- Putin says he will respond if the US attacks again
It seems to me we all have a vested interest in having an open discussion about this.
I’m pretty sure that neither the people of Russia nor the people the US want to be annihilated in a nuclear war.
I don’t think anyone wants that.
Yeah, except that guy. And Jews.
The rest of the 7 billion people on the planet though would definitely prefer a discussion.
But of course, if an open discussion was on the table, missiles never would have been fired in the first place.