Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
December 23, 2013
Following the release of the Jew criminal Mikhail Khodorkovsky, who should have been executed, Putin has released two of the three Pussy Riot sluts who should have been executed.
The women not only brutally violated the sanctity of a church, but engaged in public sex acts in front of children. What sort of a statement is Putin making by forgiving such unforgivable criminality?
From Time:
Feminist punk rockers Maria Alyokhina and Nadezhda Tolokonnikova walked free from prison on Monday, months ahead of their scheduled release in March.
[…]Tolokonnikova left a prison colony in the city of Krasnoyarsk, eastern Siberia, on Monday, just hours after Alekhina was freed in another part of the country.
“There is no new Putin,” Tolokonnikova told BuzzFeed, shortly after her release, pushing back against the notion that recent prisoner releases signal a softening tack by the Russian leader. “This is a small step back, but a small one. There are still plenty of people in the jails.”
I understand the idea that Putin wishes to soften his image internationally, but is it fair to the Russian people to allow these terrorists back out on the streets to continue to work toward the destruction of the Russian nation?
The first thing that the sluts did upon release was resume their attacks on the society, calling for a boycott of the Olympics due to Putin’s zero tolerance for homos policy.
From the BBC:
A member of Russian punk band Pussy Riot has called for foreign countries to boycott February’s Winter Olympics, hours after she was freed from jail.
Nadezhda Tolokonnikova dismissed the amnesty law that set her free, saying it was a “cosmetic measure”.
She and band-mate Maria Alyokhina, who was also freed, said the prison system needed wider reform and promised to continue anti-government action.
“Anti-Government action” – what sort of government gives approval of anti-government action?
Did Putin expect that they would do something different than this?