Putin to Stone: Snowden Not a Traitor, But What He did was Wrong

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
June 4, 2017

“He’s not a traitor, but it was wrong” is a frighteningly nuanced take on the Edward Snowden leaks.

It’s almost as if we’re dealing with a global leader who thinks in more colors than “black” and “white” (note that neither black or white are true colors).

As I explained yesterday, I am very much looking forward to this Oliver Stone documentary on Putin, to be shown in four parts on Showtime.

The first part airs June 12th at 9 PM EST.

For those of you without TV, I’m sure it will be available online. For those of you who live in countries who have not signed international copyright treaties, such as Switzerland, I’m sure you’ll be able to find it on a certain Pirate Ship.

Interesting Note

Yesterday, I noted that Oliver Stone is an interesting person, who is half-Jewish on his father’s side but was raised Christian. I pointed out that by Jewish law, he would not be considered a Jew, as Jewish lineage is determined through the maternal lineage.

Someone noted that they don’t care what Jewish law is, that they care what NSDAP law is, and the NSDAP would have considered him a Jew.

I replied:

This is not exactly true.

I’m not exactly sure why it isn’t widely known that modern internet Nazi blood laws are much, much more extreme than the Nuremberg laws.

A half Jew was allowed to gain citizenship in the Reich under certain circumstances.

Nuremberg Laws – Reich Citizenship Laws – Wikipedia

Stone also would have been eligible to apply for a German blood certificate, which would have given him full rights, effectively being considered a pure German.

Mischling – Wikipedia

The fact that he was raised Christian would have been a big benefit to him in the application process. The fact that he has openly stated opposition to the Jewish agenda and publicly named Jews as offenders contributing to the decline of Western civilization and the world as a whole would also have played greatly in his favor.

#To be clear

I’m not even saying that this is right or wrong, but to say that the National Socialist Germans were somehow as strict about this stuff as modern internet comments section people is just wrong information or a lie.

To be clear: if you want to take this position, that is certainly fine and I might even agree with it, but do not cite the Nazis as a reason for taking this position, as then you are just – purposefully or non-purposefully – spreading false information.

The fact that modern internet comments section people are so much more extreme when it comes to race than the Nazis themselves is an interesting issue.

As I said in my reply, I am not going to say that I disagree with it. Obviously, at some point it does become ridiculous and goofy. My DNA test, which I posted here, came back with 99.3% European, .7% “unassigned.” This means that I could potentially be 1/128th non-White (that’s 2-4-8-16-31-64-128 – seven generations back). This certainly does not bother me personally, I I am quite certain I do not think we should be saying “100% PURE OR YOU’RE OUT” as a policy.

At the same time, I have seen people (cough, some guy on TRS, cough) say that the measure should be 75%, which to me is insane.

That would include this guy (the Black Lives Matter speech guy from that doctor show):

In all honesty, the entire “WHO IS REALLY WHITE THOUGH??????” question seems to be a result of autism in the movement, as well as shills, who use questioning people’s Whiteness as a way to cause division. Before I posted my DNA, there were feminists claiming that I was secretly a gook-nigger mix, because they had allegedly done some analysis on the shape of my nose.

So the whole issue, in my opinion, should mostly be avoided. We should draw the lines of “who is White” at “who was included in historical Christendom,” and be done with it. We shouldn’t question the whiteness of Southern Europeans, nor should we start talking about how some Turks or Iranians or Mestizos can be White.

When it comes to Jews, it’s more complicated, because Jews have been with us so long, mixing blood with us, that the overwhelming majority of them only have a relatively small trace of Semitic blood, and the Semites were already a Caucasoid race. The problem with the Jews is that they are not even a race, they are, as Rosenberg said, an “anti-race” – they have mixed blood with different races to create an entirely new race, and then they have obsessively interbred with themselves to ensure certain psychological and behavioral traits. Ashkenazi Jews have a majority European DNA – for German Jews, it is 70% or more. But even if they bred themselves to 99% European, they would still be Jews, as their Jewish nature is based on the way in which they bred themselves – they selectively choose partners from the host race for certain traits, and it was the Jewish religion that allowed them to choose these traits efficiently.

My analysis yesterday was on how Oliver Stone has demonstrated both Jewish and White characteristics throughout his artistic and political life.

To me, this is fascinating.

But I do think the “WHO IS REALLY WHITE THOUGH????” conversation on the internet has gotten completely out of control.

If someone emails me and tells me they have one Asian or Arab grandparent, I will say “no, you’re not White.”

Conversely, if someone emails me and says they took a DNA test and found they are 1/32nd or 1/64th Indian or Asian, I tell them not to worry about it.

Maybe we do need some math equation here, I don’t know. But I do know that obsessing over it is unhelpful, and I do think that pointing out that the NSDAP themselves, in their own legal doctrine, did not go as far as a lot of internet people, is a helpful fact to point out when people start to get all autistic about it.

ALSO

I hope they’re not driving in Moscow.

Putin really shouldn’t be allowed to drive in Moscow.

Honestly, no one should be allowed to drive in Moscow.