Oz: Racial Discrimination Act Changes Would Allow Holocaust Denial – It’s About Time!

Brett Light
Daily Stormer
May 7, 2014

Gaylord nancy-boy Shane Rattenbury thinks “free-speech” with certain limitations is still “free speech”….. What? And I’m a vegetarian who eats meat!
Gaylord nancy-boy Shane Rattenbury thinks “free speech” with certain limitations is still “free speech” What? And I’m a vegetarian who eats meat!

This is interesting. From The Age:

Holocaust denial and racial abuse on public transport could be allowed in Australia under proposed changes to the Racial Discrimination Act, Greens MLA Shane Rattenbury has warned.

Removing section 18c of the act could also cause the country’s repution abroad to suffer, akin to the fallout from the 2005 riots at Cronulla, violence against Indian students in Melbourne and the nation’s treatment of asylum seekers.

In a submission responding to an exposure draft released by Attorney-General George Brandis, Mr Rattenbury argues repealing clauses that make it illegal to “offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate” on the grounds of race would set back Australia’s multicultural progress.

The changes have received wide-ranging and sustained criticism, including from some government MPs and cultural and religious groups around Australia.

Mr Rattenbury plans to seek amendments to the ACT’s own Discrimination Act to outlaw the behaviour if the Commonwealth changes go ahead.

He said the current laws placed only a minor and justifiable limitation on free speech and concerns were “hyperbolic and unwarranted”. 

“My view is that if the changes are introduced and passed, they will not result in any increase in genuine and constructive free speech in Australia,” Mr Rattenbury said in the four-page submission.

“However, they will ‘dog-whistle’ to an unattractive underbelly of racism, promoting behaviour that will erode tolerance and harmony in Australia and cause significant mental, psychological and possible physical suffering to ethnic and religious minorities.”

A proposal measuring the effect of the act to be determined by the standards of a reasonable member of the community defeats the purpose of discrimination provisions, he argued.

Holocaust denial?

Yep, I deny it because it’s a load of crap.

Mr Rattenbury argues repealing clauses that make it illegal to “offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate” on the grounds of race would set back Australia’s multicultural progress.

Did anyone ever ask us (white Australians) if we wanted “multicultural progress”? Of course not. That’s because Democracy is full of crap. It is really just a system of Jewish dictatorship disguised as a system which gives everyone a “fair go”.

He said the current laws placed only a minor and justifiable limitation on free speech and concerns were “hyperbolic and unwarranted”. 

Don’t try deceive me Mr. Rattenbury. It’s either “free speech” or it isn’t. There is no middle ground. Which is it?

“genuine and constructive free speech”

This is code for politically correct speech. As long as the Jews, minorities, and white liberals agree with it, you can say it. If not, they want you to shut up. What a joke.

“However, they will ‘dog-whistle’ to an unattractive underbelly of racism, promoting behaviour that will erode tolerance and harmony in Australia and cause significant mental, psychological and possible physical suffering to ethnic and religious minorities.”

What about the unavoidable psychological and physical suffering (I.e. rape/violent crime) the White MAJORITY will have to tolerate in order to embrace this wonderful multicultural society? Once again, no consideration for Whites. Although, this really comes as no surprise from the Jewish system’s news rags.

I don’t know how much more obvious all this stuff has to be before Whites wake up to it.