Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Benjamin Garland
Daily Stormer
June 22, 2015
This is an outrage.
I have never been so offended in my life.
I just had the displeasure of watching the movie Jurassic World, and am thoroughly convinced that it has single-handedly set female empowerment back to the Stone Age.
We are basically probably going to have to start over from scratch now.
As Jada Yuan wrote:
So much for the advent of the post-Furiosa action-heroine era. That was a great three weeks while it lasted.
With this trashy film, the patriarchal propagandists who run Hollywood skillfully distract the viewer with a terrible plot, cheesy dialogue and awesome dinosaurs that eat people, in order to subtly slip in their subversive anti-humanity agenda.
Here’s the whole plot of this racist, sexist movie:
“White” man knows that it is stupid to allow a dinosaur to roam around eating people.
Stereotypical Indian man and empowered woman who run the park are too greedy to consider taking drastic measures to stop said dinosaur in order to save a bunch of innocent lives, because it might hurt profits, so they tell the “white” man to bugger off.
Then ‘shtf’ and the “white” man promptly puts feminist woman in her place in typical caveman, patriarchal fashion, and she then wets her panties and swoons all over him.
Vox has just about everything you need to know with its Guide to Jurassic World’s Sexism Controversy:
Jurassic World is now one of the most successful movies ever made. It’s also one of the most successful movies ever made that’s been branded as sexist.
Yes, this silly summer flick about a group of fantastic idiots who invent a killer dinosaur, a dopey hero who can talk to Velociraptors, and the worst security detail ever assembled is also, to some people, a misogynistic fable. Indeed, the film has spawned reviews from outlets as varied the New York Times, New York magazine, and Slate that read like a disclaimer you might find at the actual Jurassic World theme park: prepare to be entertained, but also to be offended.
The outcry is rooted in the film’s treatment of its female, non-dinosaur protagonist, the rigid operations manager Claire Dearing (Bryce Dallas Howard). But the debate goes beyond what Dearing (and Howard) leave on screen and delves into questions about art, about criticism, and inevitably about politics.
Here’s a brief guide.
Ironically, the conversation about Jurassic World‘s sexism began with Age of Ultron director Joss Whedon
The controversy over whether Jurassic World is sexist started in April — approximately two months before the film’s June 12 release — when Joss Whedon tweeted a response to one of its teasers.
“I’m too busy wishing this clip wasn’t 70’s era sexist. She’s a stiff, he’s a life-force – really? Still?” he wrote. (Whedon has since deleted his Twitter account, but not because of his Jurassic World tweet.)
Because Whedon is a famous director and TV creator, and a well-respected voice when it comes to issues of gender and feminism, his comments became a news story of their own.
When Whedon made his quip, only the people involved in making the film had a real grasp on its plot and characters. Back then, the trailers made it seem like there’d been a conscious marketing decision to portray Chris Pratt’s Owen Grady as a hero with a sense of humor (thanks to his jokes about dinosaurs having sex), while Dearing (Howard) was presented as cold and unfeeling:
And get this:
“Apparently, the abbreviation for one of the dinosaur species sounds like a British racial slur,” so says National Review:
As if all of its sexism wasn’t bad enough, it appears that Jurassic World may have a racism problem, too.
The controversy: The film features a dinosaur species called Pachycephalosaurus, which at times characters call “pachys,” which sounds too much like “paki,” which is a slur for South Asian people that’s used in Britain.
Many on social media expressed shock at hearing the word — and particularly with hearing the line “The Pachis are out of containment!” once the dinos had escaped.
the whole paki thing in jurassic park isn’t exactly as innocent as it seems idc
— 5’2 butmythroat 7’4 (@sylhetishawty) June 18, 2015
I am reeling this week. First it was Rachel acting Black. Now Dinosaurs running around calling themselves Paki in Jurassic Park. End Days. — Raf (@1Rafz) June 16, 2015
omg in jurassic world they actually said ‘another paki roaming outside his zone’ THAT’S TEN TIMES WORSE
— minal (@hajmolas) June 19, 2015
This is completely unacceptable. Can you believe this? In 2015?
…
Ok, with all kidding aside now, in fact, this is obviously actually just a clever piece of pro-feminist propaganda produced by the Arab women who run Hollywood. A kind of controlled opposition. Women were running out of things to bitch and whine about due to everything in society already being so incredibly feminized, so they made this movie to fill the void.
Ok, actually, (for real this time), I could care less about any of this. I just found the accidental anti-feminist parts of this godawful movie (the movie is overall very feminist, of course) slightly amusing as I impatiently waited for a T. rex to show up.
SPOILER ALERT:
A T. rex does show up. And it kills the genetically modified mutant monster that is chimping out all over the island eating and killing everything in its path. Fast forward to the last 5 minutes of the movie if you want to just see that.
I can’t otherwise in good conscience recommend that anybody watch this movie – the only caveat being that it is generally at least slightly entertaining to watch dinosaurs eat people.
