Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
July 27, 2015
Even while the filthy Jewish liars continue to claim that the slippery slope is a fallacy of logic, the slippery slope keeps on sliding.
Did anyone really expect that gay marriage – and then boys cutting off their own penises – would be the end of the line? I doubt anyone really thought that.
Recently, the Jews have been calling for the normanlization of polygamy. Now, we see they are also well at work on normalizing incest.
A recent piece by Tauriq Moosa on Big Think gives us an insight into the “logic” they’re going to be using.
In Britain recently, a young lady was ‘caught’ having sex with her brother. Both siblings have blamed the other, citing alcohol, desperation and so, on as motivations. This is not of concern. What is of concern is that “the pair were convicted of committing incest under section 1(1) of the Criminal Law (Consolidation) (Scotland) Act 1995”. The brother is 21, while his sister is 18. Now, according to the law, they should be convicted.
However, laws are not perfect. What should matter to us, firstly, is whether they’ve done something wrong.
Often when people hear incest, they assume rape or paedophilia, too. But here it’s clear that neither rape nor paedophilia are the problem in the recent case, since both siblings are adults and both consented – in the same way any other drunken couple implicitly consent, since neither partner was forced into it.
Assume they were not brother and sister; is the sex act wrong? Given the implicit consent and their ages, it’s not clear that this would be any different than other sexual engagements where, after the fact, one or both (or all three) regret the act. However, neither one feels the other was violated in the sense of calling it rape. So that’s not the issue.
Notice, though, that even if one of these two was violated – whether because s/he was too young or raped – then it would be the violation through rape or paedophilia that made it wrong, not the fact that they’re brother and sister.
So, we’re clear that what makes this wrong is solely the fact that it’s incest – that is, the fact that they’re brother and sister. But why does this make it wrong?
You see that they are building off of previous social victories. The question is framed within the new morality, and of course, within this new morality, there is no reason to believe incest is “wrong.”
By the way, Germany has already legalized incest.
Enjoy the ride, goyim. This slope is as slippery as a wet otter.