Pomidor Quixote
Daily Stormer
June 26, 2019
Take a look at the mind of the modern Western woman.
Kelly Tyler wrote on Medium:
What is your number?
It’s a question that comes up sooner or later. But if you have been sexually active fot 10 plus years, it is surprisingly easy to rack up a number so big you can’t even precisely recall.
Of course if I were a man I would be celebrated for this. But I’m a woman so many men simply call me a slut and refuse to date me (but still offer me the privilege of having sex with them).
Having an active sex life is important to me. Sex is one of the most basic human functions. And 8 partners per year on average actually doesn’t sound like that much to me at all.
Anyone who has been single in a major city know that you can line up a weeks worth on tinder dates in a matter of hours. Sometimes multiple meet ups in the same night.
I regularly get tested, I don’t have daddy issues, and I was not abused as a child (as one guy wondered aloud as we lay in bed after fucking).
But it does seem to be a sticking point with guys when it comes to relationships. Maybe I should just lie? But honestly, it’s not something I’m that embarrassed about. My collection of cats, crushing student loans, and pitiful excuse for a car are things that embarrass me. Not my number.
She doesn’t realize that her number is directly related to the things that embarrass her.
Check out some of the replies below.
There’s a reason double-standards exist between sexes when it comes to number of partners. If you’re a reasonably-attractive woman, you can find someone to have sex with you in under an hour. Doesn’t matter if you can barely form a coherent sentence, you could go on Tinder, swipe right a few times, and be on your back in no time. Your number being over 100 tells your partners that you’re not discerning — all you did was say “yeah, sure” 100 times. To many men, that indicates that you’re not worth taking seriously, that you have bad judgment, that you have low self-confidence, that you’re validation-seeking, that you crave instant gratification.
Whereas in order for a man to have had sex with that many women, he generally has to be exceptionally attractive, charming, smooth, interesting, successful, etc. Attractive women don’t have to be any of these — men will fuck you no matter what. So while this seems like a misogynistic double-standard at first blush, it makes perfect sense given the different circumstances men and women face.
…
You wrote in your article that you had 8 partners on average per year. In your quora account, however, you wrote this:
“I stopped counting in college but I can easily get 1–2 guys per week. Sometimes it just a bj or me eating their ass. Then again I’ve been to a few orgies where I would have added 10+ partners per event. Well over 100.”
and this
“I lost track but could Be as high as 500, personally. And I’m not even the “sluttiest” friend lol”
You have yourself mentioned that you are a slut in quora. Your article contradicts your own words! If a woman that slept with 500+ men in 10 years (1 per week for 10 years continuously) isn’t called slut, then who is?
The best comment, however, is a succinct:
lmao slut
Also…
This is not an extreme slut. This is just a regular single woman.
See, women are going to have sex no matter what. They’re either going to have boyfriends and husbands or they’re going to have hundreds of strangers echoing in their woman caves.
If you want an estimate on how much of a slut some woman is, you could get a pretty good one by just looking at the time she’s spent single.
The more time they’ve been out of real relationships, the easier it is for you to have sex with them.
That said, this is what happens when you let women make decisions. With all of this #MeToo explicit consent insanity going on, if they ever implement some sexual consent contract form thing, we should push hard for those contracts to be added up to a publicly available file on each woman so interested partners know what’s visited her womanly roads.
Also, cages could have prevented this.