SPLC Hate Report Reads Like Bad Satire

CoCC
September 7, 2013

From CofCC.org Website Staff

With the SPLC’s massive $20 million dollar annual budget and and 70 member staff, they compiled 328 “hate incidents” for 2012.

Of these, 105 “hate incidents” where not actually “incidents.” They were legal developments related to incidents formerly covered. So that brings the list down to 223. Of that 19 incidents are things that are perfectly legal. So 8.5% of the “incidents” were not even crimes.

Another 99 were vandalism, so of them pretty minor acts of vandalism. That means 44.4% of the incidents they report are vandalism, but some of those acts of vandalism are hoaxes.

For example, the SPLC is reporting an act of vandalism for March 2013 that has been exposed as a hoax. Two radical left-wing activists, one a major campaigner for Barack Obama, were behind the “racist” vandalism. Yet, the SPLC still claims that it was a racially motivated “hate incident” as of September, 3rd, 2013. Many more of these vandalism “hate incidents” the SPLC reports are suspected hoaxes, but police never made a definitive ruling.

The SPLC only came up with three murders for the entire year of 2012. One is an unsolved doubled shooting of two young white females by a white male. One of the victims died. The perp is at large and the motive is still unknown. The SPLC calls it an anti-Lesbian crime. Police say they have no way of knowing if the perp even knew or suspected that his victims were lesbians.

Murder number two is a black transvestite who was shot and killed in a parking lot in Oakland. Police believe a black male started a conversation with the transvestite and became enraged when he discovered that the person was really a man.

Murder number three is a white Marine who was charged with 2nd degree murder for killing another white Marine during a fight. The man charged has rejected a plea deal and fighting the 2nd degree murder charge. He maintains that the deceased man attacked him and he was acting in self-defense. The SPLC falsely claims that the alleged perpetrator “yelled an anti-gay slur” during the attack. The SPLC appears to be painting it as an anti-homosexual murder. Except the alleged victim was not homosexual. The “mainstream” media has even denied that their was any kind of anti-homosexual motive and that the alleged victim is was not homosexual. Everyone knows that straight men routinely call each other anti-gay slurs when fighting.

So the SPLC claims there is an epidemic of white on black hate crimes, but could not find a single fatal white on black hate crime for the entire year of 2012. They listed an unsolved white on white murder, in which the motive is unknown. An unsolved black on black murder involving a transvestite, and an alleged white on white murder in which they purposely misconstrue as something it was not.

In 2012 52.9% of the incidents the SPLC tracked were either perfectly legal or vandalism. Much of the vandalism is petty, and some of the vandalism was perpetrated as hoaxes. Another 7% of the incidents reported were threats, and harassment. Some of the incidents listed are very minor, and some are probable hoaxes. Arson accounted 3.3% or eleven incidents. Several were arson of a car. Only two of the alleged attacks have black victims, and one of those cases their is no known suspect or motive. Only one appears to be an actual racially motivated arson attack by a white person against a black person.

Meanwhile racially motivated black on white fatal hate crime are occurring every single week in the United States.

Now that we know what the SPLC considers to be a “hate crime.” Let’s see what they do not consider to be a “hate crime.”

Mass black on white rapes are not “hate crimes” according to the SPLC.

According to the FBI, 62 white women were raped or sexually attacked by black men per day between 2003-2008. In each of these six years the FBI reports white on black rapes and sexual attacks as a statistical zero. It is so rare that not a single case appeared in the massive sample size six years in a row. When confronted with the FBI’s data on sexual attacks for the year 2005, the SPLC gave an extremely disturbing response.

“It’s unclear how many, if any, of the black-on-white rapes [occurring in 2005] were hate crimes.” – SPLC, October 8th, 2009.

Rampant black on white mob attacks are not “hate crimes” according to the SPLC.

When confronted with the string of racially motivated mob attacks against white people by black perpetrators all over America, the SPLC gave another very disturbing response. In August 12, 2011, the SPLC suggested that black mob were attacking white people because of “self-hatred,” not “racial hatred.” The SPLC neglects to mention that every sociology study for the past fifty years shows that young blacks, on average, have higher self-esteem than young whites.

The SPLC states that “race may only be a coincident factor in the disturbances.”

The SPLC also claims that brutal racially motivated torture murders of white in South Africa are not hate crimes. In February 29th, 2012 the SPLC wrote an article denying that the racially motivated tortured murders of white South Africans are hate crime. The SPLC quotes Economist magazine as giving a much lower death toll and saying only 2% of the murders are racially motivated. Except the super low ball death toll and comical 2% figure actually come from the ANC controlled South African government. The figures are from a government report published in 2003. Economist magazine reports on the figures given and then says they are disputed.

So the SPLC uses data from the ANC controlled South African government and falsely attributes it to Economist magazine to make it sound more credible. The SPLC links to a second “source” from 2001 that reports on murder sin South Africa, but doesn’t even talk about the motives.

So brutal torture murders in South Africa are robberies, not hate crimes. Rampant nationwide black on white mob attacks are coincidences. Black on white rapes are rarely, if ever, hate crimes!