Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
June 17, 2016
ISIS is a horrible terrorist organization trying to overthrow the regime of Bashir Assad.
The solution to this problem?
Bomb the Assad regime.
CNN:
More than 50 State Department officials signed an internal memo protesting U.S. policy in Syria, calling for targeted U.S. military strikes against the regime of Bashar al-Assad and urging regime change as the only way to defeat ISIS.
The cable says that U.S. policy in the Middle East has been “overwhelmed” by the continuing violence in Syria. It calls for a “judicious use of stand-off and air weapons, which would undergird and drive a more focused and hard-nosed U.S.-led diplomatic process.”
CNN reviewed a draft of the memo, which has since been classified. The Wall Street Journal first reported on the memo’s existence.
The internal memo was sent throughout the “dissent channel,” a mechanism for State Department officials to offer alternative views on foreign policy without freedom of retaliation or retaliation. It was established in the 1960s during the Vietnam War to ensure that senior leadership in the department would have access to alternative policy views on the war.
The 51 officials who signed the memo are mostly from the rank and file of the department, many of them career officers in the foreign service who have been involved in Syria policy over the past several years either in Washington or overseas.
There are no high-level names but they reflect a widespread view in the State Department that tougher military action in Syria is needed to force Assad to negotiate a diplomatic solution. Secretary of State John Kerry himself has advocated a more muscular U.S. military posture in Syria to force Assad to negotiate a political settlement.
John Kerry is an admitted crypto-Jew, for anyone keeping score.
He claims he didn’t know it until someone told him.
The memo calls on the U.S. to create a stronger partnership with moderate rebel forces to battle both Assad’s forces and ISIS, which would change the tide of the conflict against the regime and “increase the chances for peace by sending a clear signal to the regime and its backers that there will be no military solution to the conflict.”
A third military force fighting both sides of a war will prove to one side that there is no military solution.
What does that even mean?
It also warns that as the regime “continues to bomb and starve” Syria’s Sunni population, the U.S. will lose potential allies among Syria’s Sunni population to fight ISIS. Moreover, it says, U.S. failure to stop the regime’s abuses “undermines both morally and materially the unity of the anti-Daesh coalition” and “will only bolster the ideological appeal of groups such as Daesh, even as they endure tactical setbacks on the battlefield.” Daesh is an Arabic acronym for ISIS.
Yes.
Another war for human rights.
Sigh.
This is about Israel. It has always been about Israel. It is Israel that wants Assad gone, just as it was Israel that wanted Saddam and Gaddaffi gone. The US State Department is crawling with Jews. The entire foreign policy of our country is written by Jews. Jews send us to die in their wars, excusing it with some incomprehensible claptrap about spreading democracy.
But a War with Russia Though?
The stakes in Syria are much higher now, as sending troops into Syria to fight Assad would amount to full-on war with Russia, who is supporting Assad. And that could spill over anywhere.
I have no idea what these people are planning, but I’m certain they’re planning something.
At the same time as they are calling for an invasion of Syria, they’re amassing troops on the border of Russia.
It would be rather difficult to set-off a World War in the Baltics. However, if the US/NATO went into Syria and began having direct conflicts with Russian troops, it would be easy to stage a border incident with Estonia or Latvia.
The biggest problem for the Jews trying to get all of this started is that there is no will among Western populations to fight another war in the Middle East, let alone a World War with Russia.
But it all really comes down to the Presidential election. If Hillary wins, she will force through all of it.
Trump will do the opposite.
It’s up to the people to decide.
