Steve Bannon Can Go Fuck Himself, I Don’t Give a Shit – He’s Irrelevant

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
November 14, 2018

Steve Bannon has said that Ethno-Nationalists can “can go fuck themselves” because we are “irrelevant.”

Being called irrelevant by Steve Bannon is like being called a liar by CNN.

Or being called ugly by Sandra Bernhard.

Or being called a whiny little faggot by David Hogg.

Boomer Bannon is the absolute epitome of irrelevance.

And his irrelevance is amplified by just how far he’s fallen, and how hard he has tried to cling to some form of relevance as he collapsed in confusion into a shallow sea of Irish whisky.

This is a man who was a senior advisor to the President. He was fired, and returned to a senior position at the world’s most powerful alternative media outlet.

After leaving the White House, he masterminded the Roy Moore fiasco, somehow managing to lose a Senate seat to a Democrat in fucking Alabama.

Then it was revealed that he brought a Jew journalist into the White House and told the Jew that the President’s family were treasonous collaborators working in a Russian conspiracy, and was promptly fired from Breitbart.

He then scuttled off to Europe to try to become an advisor to Marine Le Pen and various other right-wing politicians in the area, and was promptly asked to leave.

Before the midterms, he held a rally in Kansas that was attended by 17 people.

How many people do you think I could get at a rally in Kansas?

I guarantee it would be more than 17.

I also guarantee I wouldn’t show up wearing anti-American Collin Kaepernick nigger shoes or fucking cargo pants.

In his last dirty-fingernailed clawing grasp to attempt to maintain any form of relevance whatsoever, Bannon has taken to appearing on the talk shows of second-rate YouTubers.

A month ago, he did an interview with Sargon of Akkad – which only got less than 20% of the views my botched debate with Sargon of Akkad got in the time it was up (the debate was deleted, so the numbers can’t be directly compared presently, but in the less than 24 hours before the debate was deleted, it got more hits than Bannon’s interview currently has – because I am more relevant than you, Steve).

The clip at the top of the page, where he made this statement against ethno-nationalists, is from an interview with Mike Cernovich, who is the absolute bottom of the barrel of failed internet celebrities. This is a guy who had a popular Twitter account during the 2016 election, then after the election, had absolutely nothing to say.

I’m just hearing about this right now – that is how irrelevant it is – but the interview was done on November 4th, and at time of writing has fewer than 17,000 views.

I won’t waste an hour of my time doing an interview that is going to get fewer than 50,000 clicks, unless I’m doing it as a favor to a close friend (Beardson).

Of course, he would probably be allowed on Ralph Retort, but he wouldn’t go on there because he’d get blown the fuck out by Mister Metokur’s bantz and Ralph would invite me on to confront him.

The fall of Steve Bannon reminds me of a really sad documentary I watched about Adam West’s life after he died.

This guy went from being on the number one TV show to being a wife-beating drunk performing at monster truck rallies, and his great comeback redemption arc was embracing his role as a human punchline about kitchy nostalgia and playing a voice on the third-rate cartoon sitcom (third after Simpsons and South Park) Family Guy.

Maybe you can get a job as a voice-actor on a cartoon show, Steve, and spend the last years of your life charging people $20 for an autograph at comic book shows before you die of liver failure.

Maybe call-up Netflix and see if they’ll let you play a drunken old pig on Bojack Horseman.

I guarantee you, Steve: you’re not going to do any better than that.

Why Ethno-Nationalism is Relevant and Steve Bannon Is Not

The type of nationalism that Steve Bannon is promoting – which can be summed up (I guess) as “workers of the world unite,” is not actually nationalism.

Because the word “nation” means “race.”

The only way to have a form of “nationalism” that includes people of a different race is to have “civic nationalism,” which means that every citizen is obligated to conform to the norms of the primary race.

This concept was invented by a loony Frenchman who was a racist and hated Jews, but believed that it was possible for a minority of members of a different race to live amongst one another as long as the minority strictly conformed to all of the cultural standards of the native people.

I am not a civic nationalist and do not think it can actually work – at least not if the minority race is bigger than 3-4% of the population (at which point it is basically normal ethnic nationalism anyway) – but it is a theory of nationalism that is technically actually nationalism, as the focus remains on the nation – that is to say, the race.

Bannon’s “economic nationalism” removes race from the question completely and simply claims that all working people of the world have a common interest they can unite around – which, incidentally, is the primary argument of Marxism.

Obviously, Steve Bannon is not promoting Marxism, because Marxism is internationalism. He is also clearly not promoting any of the specific economic doctrines of Marxism. But he is starting from the same point: that economics form the core of human existence, and that decisions should be made from that starting point.

This reduces the nation – and thereby human existence itself – to an empty, soulless, identity-free series of monetary transactions.

Donald Trump, on the other hand, is a nationalist.

I don’t know what kind of nationalist he is, and I don’t think he has a precise understanding of that himself, but I believe he is a nationalist.

The fact that he doesn’t have a clearly stated ideology, or a clear personal ideological vision, makes him that much better than Steve Bannon. What Trump has done from the beginning is promote what the people themselves want, without really injecting any type of ideology into that.

Everything that he does is about protecting the interests of white people, because white people are his base, they are projecting their interests onto him, and he is doing his best to get the stuff done.

This is what we would call “populism” and it is actually the perfect situation right now.

I love that Trump is just a man who loves America and acts on instinct. If Steve Bannon was President, attempting to force this specific ideology he has, we would be a lot worse off.

As it stands right now, America is slouching toward White Nationalism to be born again.

There is no other potential outcome than White Nationalism.

So we who are pushing it are the most relevant people in the entire political landscape, save Trump himself.

We are preparing a generation of young white men to fight for a specific ideology which will work, which has always worked, when the time comes that this ideology can be openly fought for.

And we are encouraging young men to keep quiet about their long-term goals and enter politics under the MAGA banner, and be ready to support White Nationalism when this time comes – and the time will come.

We have a clear path to implement a system. We have a plan that is going to play out over the course of decades. We are establishing the framework for global white revolution, which will end in the reclaiming of white homelands for white men.

What is Steve Bannon doing?

It seems to me that all he is doing is trying to get people to care about him.

Call Netflix, Steve.

Leave the future of America to us.