‘Storm Clouds Gathering’ Launches Nonsensical War on Andrew Anglin of Total Fascism

Andrew Anglin
Total Fascism
October 19, 2013

Yesterday, a YouTube channel called “Storm Clouds Gathering” posted an attack video on me and my website entitled Economic Collapse & The Rise of Fascist & Racist Elements. The highly produced video mimics the methods of the mainstream Jewish media as it goes through parts of my manifesto, and, without citing any form of data, or even formulating an argument of any type to counter my positions and analysis regarding how to establish a new society, attempts to claim that everything I am saying is wrong, and that I and those that think like me should be shunned.

A quick perusal of the other videos on this YouTube channel will show that this person is a libertarian conspiracy-mongering truther, in the vein of Alex Jones. The video view counts indicate he is quite popular

Popular Uploads - StormCloudsGathering YouTube
The typical distractions and distortions.

Immediately after posting the video, the comments section exploded, and the uploader was forced to engage in heavy censorship – which is funny, considering one of his main points of attack was that in my manifesto, I expressly state that I do not believe in total free speech.

Eventually, he became tired of censoring, and closed the comments.

First this message was posted...
First this message was posted…
...then this one...
…then this one…
...and finally, this one, which appears on the video at time of writing.
…and finally, this one, which appears on the video at time of writing.

Note that this backlash was not from ‘my people,’ but from his own fan base, who viewed his attack on me as more of the typical Marxist garbage we are constantly fed by the mainstream media. This confirms what I have said before: most average White people (Americans particularly), when directly confronted with claims, such as those made in the video, that we do not have a right to live peacefully among our own kind, will respond negatively, regardless if they have anything to do with White Nationalism or ‘fascism.’

These are presently the top two comments on the video.
These are presently the top two comments on the video.

The video maker censored my name and the name of this website in the video, claiming that he did not want to send me traffic (though one is left to wonder, if my ideas are so obviously wrong that one does not even need an argument to dismiss them, why should my site be hidden from the people?); however, many of his fans are finding me, and some are sending me emails and posting comments. I imagine more will be swinging through, to see exactly what it is I am saying. Because of this, I will go through and respond, on a very basic level, to all of the attacks in the video, so as my position is clear to those who may be new-comers to this type of information.

Throwing Down the Gauntlet

I want to state clearly, right now, that I wish to debate the maker of this video at the soonest possible opportunity. He had the time to sit and make a highly-produced video attacking me, surely he has the time to do a 90 minute Skype chat, moderated by a neutral party, where we can both state our ideas and let the people decide.

If the man has any trace of honor, surely he cannot refuse to debate me after launching a propaganda offensive against me.
If the man has any trace of honor, surely he cannot refuse to debate me after launching a propaganda offensive against me.

I have absolutely nothing to hide – when I disagree with the ideas of an individual on this site, I state the individual’s name, and invite people to go read their material and draw their own conclusions about it.

Surely, as the libertarian video producer is advocating ‘total freedom’ – including the freedom to produce and distribute drugs, and to push homosexuality on children, to openly lie and deceive for the purpose of drawing profit from gullible and confused people – he should be able to respect my right to respond to these attacks. If he has confidence in his own ideas, I am quite certain he should have nothing to fear from open debate – though both the refusal to name me in the first place, as well as the intense censorship of comments, seems to indicate he does not have much faith in his own ideas.

I do not honestly believe that there will be a debate. On the Jewish issue alone, there is simply no possible response in a debate – everything in our society is controlled by Jews, and yet he would have you believe that this is some sort of delusion. It would be very simple for me to name these people off, in a debate setting, as this is not part of any theory, it is actual fact.

Jewish control is simply not something that is open for debate or speculation. These are people with names. The only possible response is “oh my god, antisemite, he wants to gas six million!” – and that is a response he could never get away with in a moderated debate.

As I believe he is also a confirmer of the Holocaust, he would have difficulty on that point as well. I would simply ask him is aware of any physical evidence that a single Jew was ever gassed in a chamber in Hitler’s Reich, and after forcing him to admit no such evidence exists, he would then state that it didn’t matter, because of eye-witness testimony. I would then ask if any other Western court in modern history has ever convicted anyone of a crime based solely on eyewitness testimony, and he would be forced to admit that no, the modern system of justice, developed out of ancient Greece and one of the basic foundations of our society, does not convict a person, let alone an entire nation, solely on eyewitness testimony. His followers would then watch some YouTube documentaries about the truth of this alleged Holocaust, and see him for the fraud he is.

The issues he brings up from my manifesto, and the idealized social order I envision, are, of course, much more subject to interpretation, and thus open to discussion and debate (which, unlike the video maker, I welcome). However, the actual facts upon which my worldview is based exist, and if he were to agree to a debate, right off the bat he would be shown to be a liar, purposefully covering up facts to the ends of pushing a Jewish, multiculturalist, anti-White agenda.

This having been stated, we may now move on to the refutation of the content of the video itself.

Point-by-Point Refutation

The introduction of the video repeats the same nonsense we were taught in elementary school about the reasoning behind the alleged Holocaust.

During periods of severe economic hardship, war, and social instability people have the tendency to look for someone to blame. Historically, the groups that are singled out as scapegoats are not chosen based on facts and evidence, they are chosen according to the prejudices and hatreds of that era. Race, religion, ethnic background and immigrant status are obvious and convenient starting points, but as these sentiments gather political power the list of enemies expands to include anyone and everyone who disagrees on any topic of significance, and the punishment for being different rapidly moves from insults to violence. Genocides and ethnic cleansings are expressions of this dark current.

This is merely convenient gibberish. The idea that people hate other people for no reason is idiotic and baseless, with no historical precedent to back it up. The truth, which happens to make much more sense, and is indeed confirmed by history, is that variant racial groups tend to have varying interests, which often conflict with one another, and this causes struggle – in times of crisis or upheaval, this struggle can become open conflict.

In Germany before the rise of Hitler, for example, the Jews controlled the vast majority of the economy, nearly the entire media, the rampant prostitution and pornography, the theater and emerging film industry, and were in the process of turning Germany into a communist nation. The “prejudices and hatreds” of the era were based on the objective fact that Jews were running the nation into the ground for the benefit of their racial group.

Never did the list of enemies expand beyond those who were denounced as enemies before the party ever took power – that is simply another lie.

The homosexual Jew Magnus Hirschfeld was at the forefront of the systemic promotion of sexual deviancy in Germany in the 1920s.  With the stated mission of abolishing Christian morality, he is often cited as the first advocate of homosexual and transgender rights.
The homosexual Jew Magnus Hirschfeld was at the forefront of the systemic promotion of sexual deviancy in Germany in the 1920s. With the stated mission of abolishing Christian morality, he is often cited as the world’s first advocate of homosexual and transgender rights.

In the post-war West, we see basically the exact same scenario, only slightly more extreme.

The immigrants and blacks in America also have their own racial interests, and these involve feeding off of what the Whites of this country have produced. This is not a theory, it is an objective, observable reality. We ‘racists’ can list off the crimes that these people commit against us every day, but for some reason the maker of the video and liberals like him are incapable of naming a single benefit that our society receives from the nonwhite populations living among us; instead of presenting a positive argument for why they should be here, they rely purely on White Guilt, telling us that if we don’t want them here, we are evil racists.

The video goes on to warn that due to the present state of economic collapse in America, people will once again start blaming groups who, for no reason, they do not like, and that we all need to be on guard for such people, as they are attempting to infiltrate “libertarian, conservative, and conspiracy oriented circles.” He laments the fact that YouTube comments sections about the banking system and government corruption point out the fact that the overwhelming majority of the people running these scams are Jews.

He then tells us about the vague dangers of ‘racism,’ before beginning to address my site directly.

I use the term ‘address’ very loosely. What he does is go through and list off points from my manifesto which he finds shocking and horrible, and apparently expects that his viewers will find equally shocking and horrible, without explaining why they are shocking or horrible. All of the points are things I have gone into my own reasoning for in detail on this site, but I will give some brief explanation of the quoted passages from my site here, for the record.

Ejection of Nonwhites from White Nations

Are we really so evil for believing that we have a right to not be conquered and dominated by foreign peoples?
Are we really so evil for believing that we have a right to not be conquered and dominated by invading foreign peoples?

First he mentions my desire to peacefully remove all nonwhites from White homelands. The most obvious reasons for removing nonwhites from White society are that they commit so many crimes and are a massive drain on the economy. In the larger scheme of things, the importation of such high numbers of nonwhites into America and Europe amounts to an end to our ancient traditions, and ultimately the genocide of our race, as we are out-bred by the massive invading populations, our women encouraged to mingle with them sexually. It is a very simple math equation – it doesn’t take a genius to see where this is going to lead. I personally believe that the White race is something worth preserving; I believe we are special, and I believe there is purpose in making sure that my race continues on after my death.

We have a natural right to exist, and the flood of immigrants into our country is a violation of this basic right. In supporting the flood of immigration, the maker of the video is showing that he is not ‘anti-racist,’ but anti-White.

The video does not explain why we would want to have all of these people in our country, or why the White race should be destroyed.

Taking Guns Away from Blacks

He then notes that I have called for firearms to be removed from the black community.

Do I need to explain why I have called for that? Is the amount of violence committed by blacks not public knowledge?

Please, raise your hand if you have a question.
Please, raise your hand if you have a question.

The video does not explain why it is a good idea to allow blacks to own guns.

Shipping Jews to an Internationally Regulated Colony

Next, he points out my position that all the Jews need to shipped out of the United States and put into an isolated area that they will not be allowed to leave, once again implying that I am a hateful bigot, who simply wants to blame someone for my problems – even while he is also blaming people, just people without any names or faces, who live in the shadows plotting a secret plan.

But there are real people, with real names, who are actually responsible for all of the problems we are experiencing in the western world, and they tend to be Jewish.

Real people, with real names, created both communism and libertarian capitalism, created feminism and black liberation, pushed gun control, immigration and homosexuality – they are Jews. Real people with real names presently control the news and entertainment media, the banking system, the war industry, the insurance industry, the diamond industry, pornography, psychiatry, the global sex slave industry, and so on. They are also Jews. One only has to glace over the Jew lists provided by Wikipedia to see that the entire core of modern society is fundamentally Jewish in nature; as I am against modern society, I am also against the Jews.

Claiming that Jewish control of the media is a 'theory' is like claiming that the sky being blue is a theory.  Jewish media control is an objective fact.
Claiming that Jewish control of the media is a ‘theory’ is like claiming that the sky being blue is a ‘theory.’ Jewish media control is an objective fact.

If you think the Jews have done the Western world a service by replacing Mozart with Miley Cyrus, traditional gender roles with feminism, marriage with promiscuity and homosexuality, White racial homogeneity with an invasion of third world immigrants, spirituality with materialism, and abundance with poverty, that is your choice. If you do not like these changes, then you too are against the Jews, whether you know it or not.

Because Jews have repeatedly been kicked out of our White nations, and repeatedly found their way back in, I believe it is necessary to make certain they are not able to do this again by creating a homeland for them, where they can live together and not run their tricks on the rest of the world, while under guard of a military force; this could be located in Israel, or somewhere else, but the important thing is that they remain there, and that a system is in place to make sure they cannot escape.

The video does not explain why you would want to have Jews in your society, destroying its very fabric while forcing you into poverty, nor does it explain why we should blame a secret group of shadow people, while we can see with our own eyes that virtually everyone controlling anything is Jewish, and that those who are not are following an agenda laid out by Jews.

State Control of Media

He then points out my goal of regulating the media.

Right now, we have a situation where “free press” means that individuals, corporations, political bodies and special interest groups can use scientific methods of marketing to psychologically manipulate people into buying what they want them to buy, thinking the way they want them to think, behaving how they want them to behave. They can literally reprogram a person’s soul using this now perfected technique.

Is this freedom? Do people not have a right to be free of oppressive manipulation of their subconscious minds for the selfish ends of those with the money to employ these technique? I believe that people have such a right, and believe that the only way that this right can be defended is through regulation of the media.

The entertainment media is responsible for promoting violence, drug abuse and sexual degeneracy to the youth of this country for a profit. How can anyone imagine that this is something which should be allowed in any society? It is not obviously wrong? Would any just man not want this to end? How can we seriously continue to defend this situation with empty rhetoric about ‘free speech,’ while our children are being systematically victimized?

How can anyone imagine that marketing this to children is okay?
How can anyone imagine that marketing this to children is okay?

The electronic media and the development of subconscious marketing techniques, along with the end of religion and the embrace of material decadence, have created a situation that the founders of this country could not possibly have foreseen when they created provisions for free speech in the Bill of Rights. The corrosive media we are absorbed in is not “free,” it is in fact the greatest form of oppression human beings have ever encountered.

The video does not explain why marketers should be able to subconsciously manipulate the subconscious minds of the people, nor does it explain why it is a good thing to allow Jewish media figures to control the thoughts of the masses and destroy basic morality, and thus the foundations of our society, with depraved entertainment.

Reestablishing Religion

Next, issue is apparently taken with my desire to use the state to empower religion, to the end of reestablishing traditional religious values.

The state should not regulate religion, it should merely make certain that religious figures do not take advantage of good-meaning people for personal gain or political ends. Clearly, this is what is happening now. In order to protect the people, there must be community organizations designed to make certain this stops happening. “Freedom” does not mean being psychologically or spiritually manipulated into giving people money or accepting a value system you would otherwise reject – that is the opposite of freedom.

The video does not explain why fake religious leaders should be allowed to abuse the people.

Seriously Dealing with Drug Use

He then claims that I want to execute people for selling pot, which I have never said, but which I perhaps should have been more clear about and will be the next time I edit the manifesto. I generally feel marijuana can be used responsibly, in various situations, though I of course believe it should be regulated by the state.

When I refer to executing drug dealers, I am speaking of those who are dealing in hard, addictive drugs such as heroin, crack and crystal meth. These drugs are causing massive suffering in our country, and yet nothing is done. A clear plan of action would be needed to deal with the problem swiftly, if our nation was to be put on the road to recovery, and this would most certainly involve the round-up and execution of dealers.

Drug Abuse rates continue to skyrocket, destroying millions of lives, while libertarians claim the best solution is to do nothing to deal with the problem.
Drug Abuse rates continue to skyrocket, destroying millions of lives, while libertarians claim the best solution is to do nothing to deal with the problem.

I am against the concept of prison, as I view work camps to be much more moral, and also a true form of rehabilitation. The modern prison system is not even intended to provide rehabilitation, and people come out to become worse criminals than they were before. Work camps provide individuals with purpose, and teach them the meaning of being a contributing member of society. Most drug addicts are victims, rather than genuine criminals, but must be dealt with with ‘tough love.’ As such, I will send users to camps, after they finish a medical treatment program, rather than to prison. In order to provide maximum assurance that the individual does not slip back into addiction, a minimum of one year should be spent in a camp.

The video does not explain why would should not deal with the drug problem.

Outlawing Homosexuality

The video also draws attention to my plan to criminalize homosexuality.

I do not accept the Libertarian doctrine which claims that as long as you are not physically harming another person, you should be able to do what you want. Individual behaviors can directly harm the larger whole of society, and homosexuality is one of these behaviors. It drives down the character of the nation, and its public display violates the innocence of children. I see no logical reason why society should tolerate this, and thus I take the traditional view – which only went out of vogue with the relatively recent Jewish-driven homosexual liberation movement – that it should be looked at as either a criminal matter, or a psychotic disorder, and dealt with on these terms.

In Jewish-controlled America, scence such as this take place in front of children on a nigh-daily basis.  Libertarians feel there is nothing wrong with this, as they are not actually commiting physical violence against an individual person.
In Jewish-controlled America, scenes such as this take place in front of children on a nigh-daily basis. Libertarians feel there is nothing wrong with this, as they are not actually committing physical violence against an individual person.

And, for the record, homosexuals do harm people physically – an incredibly high number of them are pedophiles, engaged in systematic victimization of children. Allowing them to run free in society and behave as they wish vastly increases their numbers, as they are very active in recruitment, and as such vastly increases the amount of physical abuse they inflict on children.

The video does not explain how homosexuality is beneficial to society, or why the video-maker believes we should neglect our sacred duty to protect the innocence of children.

Video’s Conclusion

The video concludes with the narrator falsely claiming to understand group psychology, using this misconception as a basis for how he believes I, and those who share my worldview, should be silenced.

[Silencing these ideas is] going to require an understanding of group psychology. A common mistake that many people make when facing destructive social trends like racism is to use a gentle approach, attempting to reason with them and win them over. This doesn’t work when dealing with crowds. Crowd psychology is fundamentally different than individual psychology. The only way to stop this kind of ignorance from spreading within a group is to aggressively call these types out, to shame them publicly and to exclude them from your circle. Give them no quarter, make no compromises, show no tolerance, and be absolute and ruthless in your condemnation of them. Sound extreme? Yes it’s extreme, but that’s what works.

There is no citation given for what he is talking about, or how attacking people based on their individual belief system even relates to group psychology, but it is clear that his plan to silence us through ridicule and attacks is idiotic. In fact, history has shown that attempts to silence an idea by attacking the representatives of it only causes it to grow. The only way to actually destroy an idea is to engage it directly and demonstrate that it is false or harmful, which is what I do when I address libertarianism and the larger whole of liberalism.

Ideas cannot be silenced.
Ideas cannot be silenced forever. The time has come for the people to hear the truth, to know it as truth, and to be set free by it.

What the video is encouraging as a solution to rising “fascist and racist elements” is a sure path to failure, but failure is their only option, given that engaging the ideas I present is impossible for them, as they are purposefully hiding documented facts from their followers, leading them around in circles for monetary gain or political ends.

I am extremely happy that the video maker decided to attack me, as it shows the level of panic that the old “no solutions, but buy our products and support our advertisers” truther crowd is suffering from. They can see us rising, with our comprehensive plans to deal with real problems on real terms, and they have no idea how their lies and empty rhetoric are going to compete with our truth and decisive plan of action.

In closing, the video tells viewers that if those following the ideas presented on this website assume power, they will kill the viewers; these truthers cannot sell their nonsense without a heavy dose of shameless fear-mongering. To demonstrate how evil my plan is, the video points to my article calling out shills within the supposed truth movement, and calling for them to be tried and possibly executed.

The video again purposefully distorts my message by telling the viewers that “these people would literally kill you or throw you in a concentration camp for saying something they don’t like.” Never would I do such a thing. I believe wholly in the individual right to think and speak freely, based on one’s conscience. What I do not believe in is the right of scam-artists to lie and manipulate masses of people for personal or political gain.

I state that these ‘truth movement’ celebrities should be put on trial and judged by a fair and just court. If the court determines that they were themselves misled, and did not understand that they were providing the people will false, misleading and highly damaging perceptions, they should not be punished. However, if it is proven that they purposefully misled large numbers of people for diabolical or otherwise immoral reasons, surely they should be punished – why on earth would we accept that individuals have a right to manipulate the minds of others to deviant and selfish ends? The video does not explain how this behavior is justifiable.

An Admission of Failure

The video ends with the following words:

We don’t need to accommodate racists. We don’t need the ignorant fringe. We can afford to push them away and in fact we must, because if we don’t then we will be lumped together with them, and that is a recipe for disaster.

This is one place where we agree. I also have zero desire to be lumped together with anyone who shares the liberal, multicultural, Jewish ideology contained in this video. I view them as in fact greater enemies than the Jews, as they are presenting themselves as a resistance movement and thus drawing well-meaning people into a system of thought which refuses to address core problems and so offers zero solutions as to how to repair our broken society.

I also fully endorse the attempts by the mainstream of the lying truth movement engage in silly demonization campaigns against me and those who think like me, as it does nothing but push people towards us, as they instinctively see the fear of loss of control that these ‘truthers’ demonstrate when they attempt to silence their opposition by distorting their message and stifling open discussion.

The problem that the Alex Jones types have is that every day people wake up to the fact that their talk of a secret ‘Illuminati Globalist New World Order’ is really a means of covering for the Jews, no one goes from understanding the Jewish problem to chasing the ghosts of invisible satan-worshipers. After understanding the Jewish problem, the racial issues become obvious, and thus the Alex Jones crowd, with their multicultural liberalism, become utterly appalling.

This attack video amounts to an admission of failure. For a time, the truthers thought they could simply ignore the rising White racial consciousness, but as they see they are each day losing more ground to our type of truly objective analysis and solutions-based thinking, they are sloppily organizing a campaign of suppression.

We are seeing this everywhere now. It is difficult to find a truther site that is not talking about the threat of ‘Neo-Nazi White Supremacist Fascism.’ Alex Jones now cannot speak ten minutes without mentioning Hitler. David Icke has declared that he will stand forever against Nazism, regardless of the growing acceptance of historical revisionism within truther circles.

They have already lost. We are taking over the narrative.

Our radical traditionalist agenda is the future.

Only bullets can stop us, and we will rise from our graves.

Hail Victory.