Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
March 30, 2014
The last few days have been a bit off, you may have noticed. This is because I was moving back to Greece for a bit. I have arrived now.
It is much warmer than Ohio. And I am happy to see that the street where I live, probably one of the worst areas in the center of the city, has a lot more police than it used to, dealing with the Muslim filth on the streets.
Things should be basically back to normal. I seem to have stable internet here, and shouldn’t be short of time.
Well, what else happened this week?
Ukraine has been largely quiet. They keep saying that there are Russian troops on the border preparing to invade, but that doesn’t actually seem to be happening. I thought Pravy Sektor was going to storm the parliament and start executing the Jews they fought to put in power after one of their leaders was murdered, but that doesn’t seem to be happening. In fact, they won’t even make a public statement against the Jews in power, which is regrettable.
What is very strange is that Muzychko, when he posted his video online that the Maidan was planning to murder him ten days before he was murdered, did not even mention the fact that all of these people are Jews. Surely, as he knew he was going to die, it didn’t matter to come out and attack the Jews. Why didn’t he? The only thing I can figure is that he didn’t know. Apparently, he didn’t read the Daily Stormer.
It’s a shame.
Traditionalism vs. Racialism
A question has come up regarding the differences between, and the relationship of, traditionalism and racialism.
The regular commenter Orion has asked me to state my position on these issues.
Here is his comment, in full.
@Andrew Anglin
I don’t like confusion.
That’s why my political world-view can be summarized in one sentence:
Any other consideration, besides the survival, expansion and improvement of the White Aryan race, must be subordinated to that basic imperative.
On religion: I find inspiration in the teachings of David Eden Lane and Varg Vikernes, both of whom base their writings on the traditional world-view of our proud Germanic ancestors of the North; both of whom were (and are, in the case of Mr. Vikernes) persecuted heavily by ZOG for their beliefs; and both of whom have sacrificed many years of their life to the struggle for White Aryan liberation.
–I am thus a Natural Law Wotanist.I am sympathetic towards Tom Metzger’s Lone Wolfism and Bernhardt Klassen’s Creativity.
I am sceptical towards christianity and any other fatalistic forms of religion involving savior-myths.
I am especially sceptical about those parts of christianity which are shared with judaism and islam, i.e. the old testament in particular.On ideology, I prefer National Socialism.
I consider eugenics, as practiced by our proud Hellenic ancestors of Sparta, for instance, to be both indispensable and self-evident as a societal measure to be emulated today, both in its negative and positive variations.On philosophy, I find Aristotelian logics sobering and useful. The works of Friedrich Nietzsche are intellectually liberating and artistically inspiring.
My favorite historians are Revilo P. Oliver and Oswald Spengler.
Now, obviously, I am not entitled to demand anything of you, Mr. Anglin.
But if you can spare the time and would not find the request too intrusive, it would perhaps be clarifying if you would, respectfully, summarize your position.My interest is genuinely one of good faith and sympathy, but I understand if you would prefer to pass on my enquiry.
1428!
The short answer here is that I am a Traditionalist before I am a racialist. Allow me to explain this with a long answer.
I would agree with your one-line synopsis, of course. But survival cannot be achieved without following certain principles, and if we simply talk about survival of the race without including how that is going to happen, we are not getting anywhere.
Traditionalism is much older than racialism. Racialism, or “scientific racism,” as it has often been called, is a product of the scientific era, having proceeded from Darwin. Traditionalism, on the other hand, goes back into prehistory.
Something like the concept of racialism existed before the scientific era, but it was framed mainly in terms of religion and language, and, obviously, physical appearance. The Muslims were considered barbarian hordes not because of an understanding of genetics, but because of their behavior, which was typically linked to their religion. There was sometimes an idea that their behavior was hereditary, but this was not formalized, because genetic science did not exist.
In the modern scientific era, where we are able to look at these things from a much higher vantage point, we can see that the Muslims adopted their religion because of their race. When we look across the globe, we see that but for a very few exceptions, Islam thrives among non-White peoples while Whites abhor it. This is due to the fact that they are drawn, by their barbarous biological nature, to a barbarous worldview.
We have also come to understand the Jew as a biological phenomenon. Before, the fact that he looked basically like us, and knew how to speak our language, caused us to view his behavior as a product of his religion. Thus rather than separation, the solution was to be conversion. And this never worked. Now we see why. Even if he does not follow his religion, he remains a Jew, and we can explain this through modern science: he has been bred to be a Jew.
Given all of this, I am most certainly a racialist, but in the context of Traditionalism. Racialism is an obvious and direct extension of what came before it, in the traditions of our people.
The fact of the matter is that race alone does not mean anything. I grew up surrounded by White people. I rarely, if ever, saw a black person. And yet, my youth was extremely unpleasant. This can of course be blamed on the culture, which can in turn be blamed on the Jews, but I never saw a Jew. My people had adopted a Jewish mode of thinking willingly. There was no force involved. Thus, this was an ideological problem, the solution to which cannot be purely racial.
You can have a pure race and still have homosexuality, divorce, abortion, materialism, atheism, drug abuse and so on. But you cannot, in the modern era, have a Traditionalist society that does not acknowledge race as a determining factor of social development, just as you did not have a traditional European society in history which accepted Muslim hordes as compatible with Christian civilization.
We not only need to cleanse our societies of the subhuman filth which occupies us, but also to cleanse our own souls of the ideological and spiritual filth which has infested us. If we were to cast out every Jew and every other non-White tomorrow, homosexuality and materialism would not simply disappear. We have accepted these things among us. The invasion was simply the next step on this bullet-train to hell we have voluntarily boarded.
I have no desire to live in an all White society which exists on the same low spiritual level as modern society. This is not a valid goal.
It is thus that while race is as important to me as other aspects of tradition, I put Traditionalism before racialism.
I am sure that my words here will be twisted by those who come against me, but I can only say what I believe to be true and hope that those with eyes to see can follow my logic.
I think that basically any traditionalist that does not care about race specifically – if such a person even exists – would recognize the obvious necessity of preserving the race for the maintenance of traditional values which are not shared by the subhumans. And conversely, any true racialist should recognize the necessity of preserving traditional values and identity in order to preserve the race.
Trying to separate our traditions, which have been carried by our blood, from the blood itself, strikes me as impossible.
Regarding Christianity
I will here explain my position on Christianity, in brief, in response to Orion and others who have questioned this.
I am a traditional Christian because all of the values of my ancestors are tied to this faith. I could list them off, but there really is no need. We all know what the values of traditional Christianity are.
Those in the White movement who attack Christianity do so on a level other than that of the physical morality, and will tend to muddy things by suggesting that modern Western Christianity has some relationship to traditional Christianity, when in fact no such connection exists. Saying that Christianity is bad because John Hagee or George Bush identifies as Christian is like saying neopaganism is bad because of these people:
Every form of neopaganism I have ever personally been exposed to has been pro-homosexual, pro-race-mixing, pro-drug use and generally pro-degeneracy. However, I would never use these people as an example of why I oppose pro-White neopagan cults. Because that would be a complete farce, and everyone would see it for just that. Yet, those who attack traditional Christianity do this exact thing, comparing us to modern Christians, which have no relationship to us at all beyond the name and symbols they use.
I am not sure how much of this is due to malice and a desire to twist reality, and how much of it is due to a genuine lack of understanding of what historical, traditional Christianity is.
It is clearly highly disrespectful to our ancestors, who fought and died under the Cross, to disrespect Christianity.
At the same time, I would never disrespect my pre-Christian ancestors, and I am thankful and proud that so much of that heritage was incorporated into Christianity.
I must admit that the idea of trying to start some new religion is one I find bizarre. The drive for that seems only a reaction to the spiritual deprivation of the modern era, and the wrong association of this depravity with the Christian faith. So I cannot really comment any further on the pagan concept, and why it is that people are drawn to it. If I had to guess, I would say that for most people it has to do with bad experiences with modern Christianity as a child, along with the Jewish programming against Christianity.
For me, the fact that my ancestors for the last 1500 or so years have believed in this religion was more than enough to get me to respect it, the fact that all of my personal values was enough to get me to embrace it culturally, and when I looked into it deeper, I found what I was looking for on a personal spiritual level.
I do not have a desire to argue about religion, nor do I have a desire to insult non-Christians. Religion is clearly a personal matter, which is left to each individual. If one wishes to be a pagan, or a Creativity believer, or whatever other thing, this is none of my concern, and on the political level, it is not for me to judge.
Hopefully that clears things up.
Donations
Donations have been slightly slow. Don’t want to pressure anyone, but I suppose sometimes people just don’t think of it when I don’t mention it. And generally, I don’t like mentioning it unless it is tucked in something else, like this is. I won’t ever crowd the place up as some folks seem to do with requests for funding.
There was an issue with the monthly donation option, which required me to change it a bit. Now you can just type in a monthly number, and push the “subscribe” button up there at the top right of the page. Any amount is good. Whatever you think the site is worth, I suppose. One time donations are also much appreciated.
And if you don’t have any money, don’t worry about it. I won’t restrict content, nor will I judge the tens thousand or so people who read the site every day and don’t donate.
If you would like to donate, you can push this PayPal button:
Or if you don’t like PayPal, you can send cash or checks here:
Andrew Anglin
6827 N. High Street, Suite 121
Worthington, Ohio
43085
I have a trusted representative depositing mailed donations in my account while I am away.
Infinite thanks to all who have donated in the past and continue to do so.
Without you, none of this would be possible.
Some Songs
Regarding Red Hair
That is all.
Hail Victory.
Andrew Anglin