Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
April 14, 2016
The imperial terrorist ZOG army of the Jewnited Snakes of Jewmerica cowered in fear earlier this week when they got straight bitched by Russian fighter jets after invading Russian territory in an aggressive, queer manner.
RT:
The aerobatics skills of Russian pilots over the US destroyer Donald Cook in the Baltic Sea left the Pentagon and other US official running for cover in Washington over “aggressive close interactions” with Russian fighter jets.
Releasing the footage of Russian jet flybys in the vicinity of the destroyer, the US Navy said that its vessel has encountered multiple “aggressive flight maneuvers …within close proximity of the ship,” some as close as 30 feet (10 meters) on Monday and Tuesday.
The set of incidents took place as the US ship, which had sailed from the Polish port of Gdynia, was conducting exercises with its NATO ally Poland in the Baltic Sea. The Navy announced that the SU-24 first flew over Donald Cook on Monday as US sailors were rehearsing “deck landing drills with an allied [Polish] military helicopter”. The numerous close-range, low altitude encounters were witnessed at 3:00pm local time, forcing the commander of the ship to suspend helicopter refueling on the deck until the Russian jets departed the area.
The Donald Cook happened to be around 70km away from a Russian naval base when the Su-24 planes passed by, according to the Russian Defense Ministry spokesman Major General Igor Konashenkov.
“On April 13, the pilots of the Russian Air Force Su-24 planes took part in a training exercise over international waters in the Baltic Sea. Their route took them to an area where the USS Donald Cook was present, around 70km from a Russian naval base,” he said, as cited by TASS.
Konashenkov added that all flights undertaken by the Russian Air Force strictly follow all international rules when traveling over neutral waters.
“Having located the ship in a zone of visual sight, the Russian pilots undertook a maneuver that was in accordance with all the necessary safety rules,” he said, while they Russian Defense Ministry questioned why the Americans were making such a big deal about the incident.
The next day, the Navy said, Russia caused concern among US sailors when a Russian KA-27 Helix helicopter flew seven times over the ship at low altitude in international waters at around 5:00pm. Some 40 minutes later, two Russian SU-24 jets allegedly made a further 11 “close-range and low altitude passes”.
“The Russian aircraft flew in a simulated attack profile and failed to respond to repeated safety advisories in both English and Russian. USS Donald Cook’s commanding officer deemed several of these maneuvers as unsafe and unprofessional,” the Navy said.
Judging by the videos released by the US Navy, the sailors were nonplussed by the Russian aerobatic skills. They gathered on the top deck of the destroyer to watch the Russian pilots.
Gloating aside, this is a very serious situation. A massive escalation of tensions. The media isn’t really even addressing it as such.
We are literally inches away from a direct military confrontation with Russia. If these Navy men weren’t all a bunch of tranny faggots, presumably they would have fired on the Russian jets, thus starting WWIII.
I mean, if you’re going to invade Russian territory knowingly, why are you going to bitch-out when they respond?
Russia is saying “make a move” and these people are like “well, uh, er…”
Something like this:
The media keeps saying “highest tensions since the end of the cold war,” but it could certainly be argued that these tensions are as high or higher than any period during the cold war.
The good news is, the West is run by cowards.
But stupid cowards.
Russia has made it clear that they are not going to be pushed around. They’ve refused to step back even an inch on anything. And yet here is the US, just poking and poking and poking.
All things being equal, the West has the military power to beat Russia in a one-to-one match-up. But things are a lot more complicated than that, given that Russia is run by much more intelligent people who have plans beyond simple military confrontation.
The situation in Europe simply could not be any more volatile than it is right now, due to the massive influx of all these Moslems along with the authoritarian measures being employed to silence all criticism. If the West started a war with Russia, openly for the purpose of protecting terrorists in Syria and the Ukraine, you would have massive revolts across Europe. These revolts would also activate Islamic Jihadism, and you’d have bombs going off nonstop. The impression on the European people would be that we are fighting a White nation to protect multiculturalism, and this idea is already very unpopular.
There is no will left in the West.
This is the face of a dying nation.
You also have the ballessness of the West, which would make it extremely hard to effectively fight a war. Ground troops sent to attack Russia would defect in large numbers.
Beyond this, the military capabilities of Russia are not really known. What we do know is that they are now far beyond what they were assumed to have been a year ago.
You also have the issue that China probably would not get involved, and may in fact support Russia.
Still Unlikely
It is still unlikely that we are actually going to have a World War any time soon. It is simply that it is becoming progressively more likely with each one of these moves by the West to trigger Russia. In this situation over the flyovers, it was very possible that the US could have shot down one of the jets without orders from the top of the command chain. This whole military is totally diversified and accidents can easily happen.
That alone wouldn’t have necessarily led to a direct conflict, but it would have risen the stakes drastically.
Presently, both sides are preparing for the potential of nuclear war.
RT:
The Pentagon is mulling a new strategy to protect the US from what it obsessively calls Russian military aggression. Citing Moscow’s alleged violations of a nuclear treaty, the DoD’s seeking to upgrade its air and cruise missile defense capabilities.
“Russia is making significant investments in cruise missiles, including a cruise missile that violates the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, which eliminated an entire class of US and Russian missiles nearly three decades ago,” Principal Deputy under Secretary of Defense for Policy Brian P. McKeon told the Senate Armed Services Subcommittee as he defended the Missile Defense Agency’s budget request for the coming fiscal year.
On the list of America’s “evolving challenges,” McKeon put Russia together with China and terrorism, adding that actions by Moscow and Beijing signal “a return to great power competition.”
The US is also seeking to “modernize” defense capability in order to remain ahead of a growing ballistic missile threat, which according to McKeon primarily consists of North Korea, Iran and Syria.
All of these perceived threats are shaping the Pentagon’s agenda, which largely depends on the requested $7.5 billion budget.
Trying to win the Committee’s approval of the 2017 funding request, McKeon said that the Department of Defense (DoD) plans to focus on “developing and implementing a strategy to address Russian military actions.”
The blueprint would include “modifying and expanding air defense systems to deny Russia offensive capabilities” as well as “investing in the technologies that are most relevant to Russia’s provocation.”
Washington would also partner with those of its allies that are “most concerned with Russian behavior” to put “increased emphasis” on improving “collective capability” in order to counter complex cruise missile threats.
“We are also encouraging our allies and partners to acquire missile defense capabilities, and to strengthen operational missile defense cooperation,” McKeon said.
“The United States will continue to encourage its NATO Allies to do more to cooperate and invest in missile defenses that will contribute to Alliance security,” he later added.
Washington and Moscow have been trading accusations of violations from the 1987 INF Treaty, which McKeon accused Russia of violating for years. In June 2015, Deputy Defense Minister Anatoly Antonov suggested that the US was “ramping up the issue of ‘Russian violations’ to justify” its own plans to deploy missiles in Europe.
Earlier, for example, the US claimed that Russia had secretly developed a nuclear-capable cruise missile for the Iskander launcher with a range of over 500 km.
Moscow, for its part, accused the US of deploying intermediate-range missiles in the form of target missiles for testing of its anti-ballistic missile systems. Russia also complained that the US is deploying missile launchers in Romania as part of its controversial ABM shield in Europe.
In his March 30 op-ed in Washington Post, President Barack Obama casually accused Russia of violating the treaty, at the same time calling on Moscow to comply with the obligations as well as engage in nuclear stockpiles reduction negotiations with Washington.
Responding to Obama, Dmitry Peskov, press secretary for the Russian president, dismissed the accusations as “unfounded.”
It’s posturing, but it’s serious posturing.
I mean, when you start openly preparing for the possibility of a nuclear war, you have entered into a very serious zone.
Make No Mistake
This is a confrontation between two conflicting value systems: that of traditional European and national sovereignty and that of Jewish globalism.
The West
Russia
The West
Russia
The West
Russia
By any objective analysis, Russia is the good guy.
Whether today, tomorrow or five years from now, a confrontation is coming.
And the future of the White race rides on the outcome of this last and final war.
There’s a war coming, White Man.
You’d better know what pack you hail.
