Study Reveals What People Think of “Diversity”

Steve Goode
White Genocide Project
February 14, 2014

A study conducted throughout the United States and Canada, has found that people believe ‘diversity’ is a good thing, but hate it to live around it, and become more anti-social when they do.

Robert Putnam, a Harvard sociologist, who is also a Liberal, has just completed a study of over 30,000 North Americans and Canadians, asking people from various cities and towns in both countries what they think about ‘diversity’. In total, the survey of people’s attitudes was conducted in 41 American cities and towns.

According to Putnam, people who live in cities like Toronto, Vancouver, and Los Angeles where White people have become or are close to becoming a minority, are much less likely to associate with their neighbors.

Not only that, but the study found that people were considerably less likely to vote, pay taxes, donate to charities, volunteer, and trust people – even people of their own race.

In his report ‘E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the 21st century’, Putnam writes: “Inhabitants of diverse communities tend to withdraw from collective life, to distrust their neighbours, regardless of the colour of their skin, to withdraw even from close friends, to expect the worst from their community and its leaders, to volunteer less, give less to charity and work on community projects less often, vote less … have less faith that they can actually make a difference, and to huddle unhappily in front of the television.”

A similar study conducted on 3,800 people by the Vancouver Foundation, fell in line with Putnam’s study, finding that people felt unusually lonelier and had less friends if they lived in areas that had many races and ethnicities, and while they believed that ‘diversity’ is a good thing, they preferred to be with members of their own ethnic or racial group.

As a Liberal, Putnam was left severely unsatisfied by his study and has made several attempts to explain why people don’t like living as a minority, but he has failed to find any other explanations – in fact many other academics from over the world have confirmed his findings.

Putnam realizes that his research has proved many of his side’s beliefs about ‘diversity’ to be wrong, finding that there was no “harmony” or “fusion”, and in fact, finding that it was a severe drain on resources and public money.

However, he still insists that doing the same thing (making places minority White) over, and over again will all be worth it in the long run, as he believes it will create a more scientific and intellectual society – despite not even a suggestion of such a thing happening yet.

He insists that trying to make people assimilate will fix these problems, arguing that there should be “more opportunities for meaningful interaction across ethnic lines.”

Putnam summarizes his report, saying that higher ‘diversity’ leads to “lower confidence in local government, local leaders and the local news media … less expectation others will cooperate to solve dilemmas … less likelihood of working on a community project … lower likelihood of giving to charity … and less happiness and lower perceived quality of life.”

Anti-Whites love to talk about ‘diversity’, but none of them will actually live in what they have created. All this ‘diversity’ and ‘mixing the races’ is ONLY ever seriously discussed in White countries. If any non-White started screaming about the ‘lack of diversity’ in non-White countries, and how non-White countries ‘should be for everyone’ – they would be laughed at . . . but in White countries people screaming those statements are given respect and lots of public money to DO just that.

No Black, Brown, or Asian country gets called “racist” because it doesn’t want to become a ‘diverse’ country. This word is reserved ONLY for White people and White countries.

Thus, it is clear to say that ‘diversity’ simply means getting rid of White people – diversity is just a codeword for White genocide.