Pomidor Quixote
Daily Stormer
May 9, 2019
United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres
One funny thing about the global warming hoax is that even if it weren’t a hoax, the solutions proposed by the hoaxers are not really doable — not even close.
AP:
The United Nations secretary-general said the world must dramatically change the way it fuels factories, vehicles and homes to limit future warming to a level scientists call nearly impossible.
That’s because the alternative “would mean a catastrophic situation for the whole world,” António Guterres told The Associated Press in an exclusive interview.
Guterres said he’s about to tour Pacific islands to see how climate change is devastating them as part of his renewed push to fight it. He is summoning world leaders to the U.N. in September to tell them “they need to do much more in order for us to be able to reverse the present trends and to defeat the climate change.”
That means, he said, the world has to change, not in small incremental ways but in big “transformative” ways, into a green economy with electric vehicles and “clean cities.”
Guterres said he will ask leaders to stop subsidizing fossil fuels. Burning coal, oil and gas triggers warming by releasing heat-trapping gases.
He said he wants countries to build no new coal power plants after 2020. He wants them to put a price on the use of carbon. And ultimately he wants to make sure that by 2050 the world is no longer putting more greenhouse gases into the air than nature sucks out.
Scientists are calling it “nearly impossible,” but this Guterres reptile wants all of us to try anyways.
You, 12 years from now
The sensible thing to do would be to focus our efforts on dealing with this almost-inevitable change instead of wasting our time trying to stop it, but he’s not suggesting that because that would mean people and countries may take actions that don’t follow the Jewish agenda. They want total control over the “saving the planet” narrative and to have a monopoly of establishment-approved “solutions” to the “issue.”
Just so you get an idea about the insanity of even trying to stop “global warming” instead of focusing on developing ways to survive it, consider the following numbers:
Global temperatures have already risen about 1.8 degrees (1 degree Celsius) since the industrial age began. The issue is how much more the thermometers will rise.
In 2015, the world’s nations set a goal to limit global warming to no more than 0.9 degrees (0.5 degrees Celsius) from now. Most scientists say it is highly unlikely, if not outright undoable, to keep man-made climate change that low, especially since emissions of heat trapping gases are rising, renewable energy growth is plateauing, and some countries’ leaders and voters are balking. A panel of scientists the U.N. asked to look at the issue ran computer models for more than 500 future scenarios, and less than 2% achieved those warming limits.
Does that sound like something worth betting your life on?
You and your friend in 12 years: 98% chance
If the Climate Apocalypse were real, we’d all be better off using the time we have left working on ways to survive it instead of wasting our efforts trying to stop it with a 2% chance of succeeding.
If countries only do what they promised in the 2015 Paris climate agreement, it would be catastrophic because the world would warm by another 4.5 degrees (2.5 degrees Celsius), Guterres said, adding “that is why we need to dramatically accelerate… what everybody knows needs to be done.”
Yet, globally the trends are going the other way. University of Michigan environment dean Jonathan Overpeck said it looks unlikely that the world could prevent another 1.8 degrees (1 Celsius) of warming, let alone 0.9 degrees.
And in an odd way that gives the U.N. chief optimism.
Because as disasters mount and deaths increase, the public, especially youths, will realize that warming is “a dramatic threat to the whole of humankind,” Guterres said.
So the worse it gets, the more people will demand change, he said.
Guterres thinks it’s good that people will die because it will help climate priests rise to absolute power quicker.
If he were serious about saving Earth, he would be talking about white people taking over the world, as we’re the only ones that really care about all of this.
But what he’s doing is talking about how whites should stop using all the technology they have and throw money at developing new “greener” alternatives while literally just asking leaders worldwide to please go along with his plan and kill their economies.
This climate stuff has always been ridiculous and insane, and it only gets worse the more they try to push it.
You’re supposed to kill your economy for a 2% chance of saving the world while the United Nations asks the Chinese to please stop becoming so powerful and to throw away what they’ve achieved so far because it makes tropical browns and blacks die in floods or whatever.
It’s insulting.