Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
August 22, 2016
Peter Sutherland, who it was recently revealed – to absolutely no one’s surprise – is a tool of George Soros, is one of the nuttiest chaps on the ethnic cleansing scene.
I guess it’s because he’s goofy and old, he can just get away with saying insane things and people just think he must have said it by accident.
His official title is “UN Special Representative on Migration,” and his stated goal is to flood Europe with as many “migrants” as he can. Even while admitting they are a “burden,” and that no one really wants them, he says they must be taken because of the UN charter and because of some vague moral obligation.
As I often point out, none of these people will ever explain the moral system they are basing their moral declarations on. Morality is an aspect of philosophy (where it is more commonly called “ethics”). Philosophy is not a science, which creates problems with using it to drastically alter society, but there are systems within philosophy which can at least serve as a framework for discussion and debate.
But they won’t even give us that. They just talk about “obligations” without explaining where these obligations came from, and certainly never defining any limits on them.
Peter Sutherland pushes all of this beyond the limits of common decency.
Whereas most within the media and political spheres are arguing for “refugees” – those who are escaping war – to flood Europe and America, he is arguing for “economic migrants” to be allowed to flood our nations.
He gave an interview last week on Morning Ireland, RTÉ Radio 1 where he again stated the position that basically everyone should be allowed in.
There is to be a UN conference on 19 September to promote sharing of refugees.
An Irish-led draft UN declaration on the refugee and migrant crisis will be discussed when world leaders meet at the UN next month.
The long document is “impossible to summarise” but contains phrases such as:
“we acknowledge a shared responsibility to manage large movements of refugees and migrants in a sensitive, humane, compassionate and people-centred manner”
That’s typical Open Society Foundation speak and they are trying shoehorn in stuff about economic migrants in with the refugee issue.
About half way through interviewer Cathal Mac Coille asks Peter Sutherland:
“This draft agreement covers both migrants and refugees. What do you say to people who say “refugees is one thing, although even then there is a limit to how much any one country can take but secondly with economic migrants, there has to be a limit”
Peter Sutherland responds:
“I think it’s fair to say there has to be a limit on economic migrants.
The last couple of months I’ve spent time both in Italy and Greece and particularly in Sicily and I’ve seen that many of those that are in the camps are clearly not persecuted persons who are refugees.
They are economic migrants
The responsibility to take refugees is clear.
Economic migrants do not have an automatic right to move from one country to another and if they were to have open borders, it would be politically unacceptable.
Now I accept that.
The only point I would make about it is that to deal with economic migrants (and they will be coming in huge numbers for decades) we have to have a real system which comprises a couple of points:
1. we have to be prepared to allow more legal migrants as part of an agreement to stop illegal migrants.
2. We have to realise that there are some economic migrants who deserve particular attention and care for example those who are escaping a natural disaster, those who are escaping famine.They have to be given rights comparable but not the same as those who are escaping persecution. Their lives can be a threat.
So we have to work out a new system which actually works and that requires more than simply erecting borders.
We’ve spent a billion euro over the last couple of years erecting borders in Europe, borders which were meant to be demolished.
Thanks to orlared for writing up that description and partial transcript. He’s a great YouTuber.