Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
October 17, 2016
Like most everything these days, Sweden has become a parody of itself.
Moslems are gang-raping wheelchair women and the police are protecting them.
You can be locked-up for giving the Roman salute or criticizing mass-immigration on Facebook, but the ISIS flag is fine.
A Swedish prosecutor has ruled that the ISIS flag does not constitute hate speech and is therefore legal under Swedish law.
Prosecutor Gisela Sjövall announced last week that she would not prosecute a 23-year-old man who had posted the black ISIS flag on his Facebook page in June.
Police in Laholm, a town on Sweden’s west coast, had launched a criminal investigation into the man, who comes originally from Syria, on suspicion of committing “hate speech”.
“Put simply, one can say that he is expressing contempt for “all others”, and not against a specific ethnic group,” Sjövall told Sweden’s SVT broadcaster.
Wow.
That’s some serious Jew-legalism right there.
Firstly, I’m not sure why he would even be charged with “hate speech” instead of “supporting terrorism.” Secondly, it isn’t “contempt for all others,” because there is no contempt for ISIS members themselves, and presumably not for related terrorist groups and states which back terrorism.
Finally, the same argument could be made for Nazi symbols – that Nazis just hate everyone who isn’t a Nazi or somehow related-to or friendly-with Nazism.
So it’s nonsense. This is just a Swedish court openly supporting terrorist organizations operating within their own borders. And the only conceivable reason they would be doing that is that they are purposefully trying to destroy/Islamize Sweden.
And it was of course a female prosecutor.
The entire government of Sweden is run by women.
They don’t really even have very many Jews.
She said that while the swastika had now come to symbolise a hatred for Jews, the same could not yet be said of the IS flag.
“Up until now, we haven’t come to that point,” she told the local Hallandsposten newspaper. “That could change in ten years.”
According to Sweden’s hate speech laws, for an image or statement to represent “incitement to hatred”, it needs to threaten or disparage a group of persons in connection to race, colour, national or ethnic origin, religious belief or sexual orientation.
“If there had been anything in the text [posted alongside the flag] with more specific formulations about certain groups, for example homosexuals, the ruling could have been different,” Sjövall continued. “For me, there are no doubts about the decision not to prosecute.”
There you have it.
What can you even say?
All I can think to say is “feminism is cancer.”
If Swedish men had maintained dominance over their women, their women wouldn’t be pushing for a foreign race of men to come in and dominate them.
Show me a happy woman and I’ll show you a well-maintained kitchen.
Show me a female politician and I’ll show you a country dominated by Moslems.