Syria Demands the US Pay Them for Having Destroyed Their Infrastructure

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
July 23, 2017

The US has long claimed that their bombings in Syria were to target ISIS, when in reality they were just randomly bombing Syrian civilians and destroying the infrastructure of the country. The reason they were doing this is because of the Jews.

The Jews want Syria to be a destroyed nation.

From the time the US entered the “war,” Syrian officials made it clear that they did not want them there and that they did not view their bombing campaigns as helpful.

Now, because of Russia’s intervention, the country is stabilizing. While the US keeps on bombing, it is getting harder and harder for them to justify it, given that there is no more excuse.

Damascus now wants money to pay for all of the destruction.

RT:

Syria wants the US and its allies to pay for the destruction of Syrian infrastructure and to bear legal responsibility for “illegitimately” bombing civilian targets, Damascus has told the UN, demanding that the American-led coalition strikes stop.

The Syrian “Government insists that these attacks must come to an end, and that the members of this illegitimate coalition must bear the political and legal responsibility for the destruction of infrastructure in the Syrian Arab Republic, including responsibility for compensation,” the Permanent Mission of the Syrian Arab Republic to the United Nations said in letters addressed to the UN Secretary-General and the President of the Security Council.

Stating that the ongoing US-led anti-terrorist airstrikes “continue to claim the lives of hundreds of innocent Syrian civilians,” Damascus claimed that the bombings had led to a “near-total destruction” of homes and vital infrastructure, including the “utter destruction” of oil and gas facilities.

The US was purposefully targeting infrastructure.

Everyone knows this. Except people who only rely on the fake news media. They think they were “fighting terrorism.”

The attacks, along with US and EU-imposed economic restrictions on Syria “are impeding the maintenance of those economic facilities and jeopardizing the prospects for development and reconstruction” in the country, the letters, written last week, said.

To support their claims, Syria’correspondence referred to two recent cases where the coalition’s jets destroyed oil and gas facilities. Damascus also said the May 27 bombardment of Hasu Albu Awf village in the Hasakah governorate, “completely” destroyed many homes and killed at least eight civilians, “most of them children.”

On Friday, the US-led coalition announced the demolition of a number of oil and gas facilities in various parts of Syria which allegedly belonged to the Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL) terrorist group.

Targeting the terrorists’ illegal oil trade and jihadist infrastructure has been a cornerstone of both American and Russian strategies in Syria. But while Moscow coordinates its strikes with the Syrian government, the Washington-led operation has been harshly criticized for its indiscriminate bombing practices and doing so without communicating with Syrian government forces.

…

However, there is little chance that the document would lead to any repercussions for Washington, international relations professor Jamal Wakeem told RT.

“I don’t believe that the United Nations will take any action against the United States, because we know it has been the tradition of the UN not to act against any aggression done by the US against any country,” Wakeem said.

Even if the UN moves forward with Syria’s claims, “the US, as a permanent member of the UN [Security] Council, would veto any resolution that could be proposed against it,” Wakeem added.

Nevertheless, Syria’s move “could affect the US, not on a political, but on a moral level,” the professor said.

Yeah, if it gets reported.

I suppose it might get reported in Europe. I don’t know.

But the good news is that the US presence in Syria is now becoming nonviable, due to the successful Russian campaign to destroy ISIS and other terrorist groups operating in the country.

The Kurd Card

The nutjob Jews are telling the US to stay and keep bombing on behalf of Kurdish communist groups, who are fighting for the establishment of a Kurdish state in parts of Iraq, Syria and Turkey, but even a top US general – when pressed by a Jew WaPo journalist on the issue last week – said that would be nuts.

RT:

A US special operations commander has admitted that an extended US stay in Syria runs contrary to international law and that Russia would be entirely justified in questioning its presence there.

At the Aspen Security Forum on Friday, Special Operations Command chief Army General, Raymond Thomas was asked whether American forces will remain in Syria, after Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL) is defeated, possibly, to support the Kurdish forces in the north of the country.

Thomas acknowledged that American forces are fighting in a sovereign Syria, where they will likely “have no ability to stay” if that presence is questioned “in terms of international law,” Thomas said, replying to the Washington Post journalist’s question.

“Here’s the conundrum,” Thomas continued. “We are operating in the sovereign country of Syria. The Russians, their stalwarts, their back-stoppers, have already uninvited the Turks from Syria. We’re a bad day away from the Russians saying, ‘Why are you still in Syria, US?’

“It has come up in the form of some close calls there, but it will be hard – I defer to the lawyers in the crowd and others in terms of international law on the basis for us staying there other than our CT [counterterrorism] writ. We went there for all the righteous reasons, but if the Russians play that card, we may want to stay and have no ability to do it.”

Syrian President Bashar Assad has said that any uninvited foreign troops, including those from the US, are “invaders” who only prolonged the conflict.

Why would you want to stay in Syria after the defeat of ISIS, when the entire stated purpose of the mission was to fight ISIS?

Unless that is just a clear admission that fighting ISIS was never actually the point of the mission. Which is what it appears to be.

Here’s that question, timestamped.

Note that the general also admits that the Kurdish terrorist group actually is the communist PKK (or YPG), saying they’re “a little bit socialist” but then noting that they have women’s rights (which is apparently now an important US military concern), and that they are trying to “rebrand” as not the PKK.

“Communist terrorists do have women’s rights tho. Gotta give them that.” -US SOCOM

Here’s a cropped clip of him talking about the rebranding.

The Kurds were fighting both ISIS and Assad, so they were the perfect ally for the US during this attempt to destroy Assad, but that just can’t work without ISIS. That creates a situation where the US would have to just openly tell the world “we support any terrorist group anywhere, just as long as they’re causing global instability.”

I don’t know what is going on with these Kurds that their entire military is women. It’s weird.

I have seen people flipping out about this idea that the US could remain in Syria after ISIS is defeated in order to help Kurdish terrorists, but there is absolutely zero chance that this could happen in real life. It is a fantasy of Jewish think tanks and WaPo writers.

Trump has already pulled the funding from ISIS which was being funneled to them through “moderate terrorist” proxies, and he has the mandate to simply get all US forces out of that country, forever.

I think it is going to work out.