Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
May 24, 2019
tfw it’s time to start cruising the middle school parking lot for ones that seem mature.
Just so everyone knows, although Britain and some other countries have already voted in the EU elections, the results are not going to be released until Sunday. Furthermore, there are no exit polls.
Apparently, they want all the results to be released at the same time, but all of the countries cannot vote at the same time for whatever reason.
I predict that Sargon of Akkad will be elected Prime Minister of Britain somehow in these elections.
They will say “we don’t know how, but somehow, Sargon of Akkad won… Prime Minister!”
And then the raping will really get going.
Oh yes.
On the other side of things, probably a lot of right-wingers are going to win really big.
You see, this is a pointless election. Despite the claims of the Jews, the EU parliament is literally not a government body. It is just a show. So people tend to vote for what they actually believe in in these elections. Whereas in other elections, they vote for who they think can beat the other guy.
However, if right-wingers win massively in this election, everyone is going to be looking around at each other and saying “hey wait a second – why can’t we just vote like this in the normal elections, if we all agree on this?”
That said, the Dutch apparently didn’t get the memo about how they’re not supposed to do exit polls, and did exit polls. And allegedly, the exit polls showed that pro-EU parties pulled off a surprise win. That could just be a hoax to fuck with the voters in other countries – “election meddling,” I guess you would call that. In fact, even if it were true it would be election meddling, because they’re not supposed to be doing exit polls.
Why did they not follow that rule? Did they not know about it? How fucking broken is the EU?
In other EU election news – check this shit out.
With all these Euroskeptic players involved, is there a threat of Russian interference in these elections?
It doesn’t seem likely. At least yet. Parliament, politicians, security services and social media companies that were bracing for an onslaught from Russia have been surprised that, so far, they seem to have avoided one.
Experts are cautious about saying Russian interference has been neutralized, but the anxiety has shifted somewhat inward, as many of the disinformation tactics pioneered by Russia have been domesticated and are being replicated on both extremes of the political debate in Europe.
That said, Russia is still working openly to promote political division in Europe. The Sputnik news agency has offered wall-to-wall coverage of the “yellow vest” protests that have shaken France. The German-language homepage of RT, formerly Russia Today, recently featured a banner debunking “myths” that the former West Germany was superior to communist East Germany. But the scale of what has been identified is nothing compared with the past — or with what the Europeans had anticipated.
In part, far-right parties in Europe have not needed Russia, because some of their domestic supporters have mimicked Russia’s strategy of promoting disinformation and amplifying it through the use of automated social media accounts.
So, okay.
Let me strap myself in here.
The right-wingers learned from the Russians how to do social media campaigns supporting their favored candidates. But it isn’t illegal for them to do it. But somehow it is illegal for Russians to do it, even though we are dealing with a system of universal suffrage democracy, where there is no law about foreigners working in media.
Okay.
Okay.
Hold on a second.
Hold up.
So no one ever thought of using social media to promote candidates until the Russians did it. This is a uniquely Russian idea. And now, only the right-wing candidates are using this technique acquired from the Russians.
Why are moderates and left-wingers not also using this deadly technique of election meddling? Are they too moral to use all possible legal means at their disposal to promote themselves? Or is it that it is impossible for them to gain any traction on social media? Perhaps the reality is that they don’t need to do anything on social media, because the entire establishment media supports them which means –
Wait, what does that mean?
How is the entire establishment media supporting candidates different than small right wing parties promoting themselves on social media? If promoting a political party is a dastardly and unconscionable act, then why is anyone allowed to promote any candidate?
I mean, this WaPo article mentions RT as if it is somehow illicit for them to use the internet to post any of their views. So we’re getting into the realm of “some political positions – outside of the already banned ‘hate speech’ positions – need to be banned, in order to protect democracy from ideas we don’t agree with.”
“Russian hacking” has become “Russians having opinions on the internet.”
Does this actually have anything to do with Russia?
Or do we simply need to make promotion of political candidates illegal across the board?
Even if that isn’t the goal, it seems to me that it is impossible to avoid the truth that the ultimate conclusion of the entire “Russians posting memes on social media” conspiracy is that no one at all should be able to promote any political candidate.
And maybe that would be best…?
Whatever the case, these establishment people seem to be catching on that the “Russian meme conspiracy” narrative can only go so far, which is why they’re backing off of it now. I don’t see why else they would back off of it. Because they don’t need any proof. We still have zero proof that Russia ever posted a single meme in support of Donald Trump. This is something that they can simply say, without needing evidence.
In fact, presenting evidence would serve no purpose, because unless you arrest someone and get a confession from them, you can’t ever prove that a post came from a specific person. There is such a thing as proxies. Some people even use 7 at once.
You run that risk double-time if you’re dealing with someone leet.
