Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
March 10, 2018
In a very real sense, the Jew is the greatest ally of the NEO-NAZI WHITE SUPREMACIST.
Going all the way back to yonder times of our great Uncle Adolf, it was only the acts of the Jew which made the Third Reich possible.
The Jews continue on their path of shoving stale gobbledygook down the throats of innocent goyim, and the goyim continue to be agitated.
The Jews have really dug themselves a rat pit in the Democratic Party. Looking at 2020 it is like, “wow – you people have no options whatsoever, you really should have tried to manage this better!”
This hillkike, Brent Budowsky, is pushing a Bernie Sanders/Elizabeth Warren ticket for 2020 – and he even has arguments for why he thinks it’s a good idea!
Because of COMMUNISM!
On March 19, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) will host a town meeting about income inequality that will feature Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), film producer and director Michael Moore and the New School economics professor Derrick Hamilton.
This subject is one of the most important issues facing all Americans in their daily lives. It strikes at the heart of the matter of jobs, wages, economic opportunity and the core fairness of the American economy.
…
Let’s consider the Democratic options for the presidential ticket in the 2020 elections, with emphasis on the possibility of a Democratic ticket in 2020 of Sanders for president and Warren for vice president.
Let’s consider three hypothetical Democratic tickets in 2020, which provide alternate models for how Democrats could regain the presidency and govern alongside a Democratic House and Senate after the presidential election.
…
The first model for a Democratic ticket in 2020 would be led by Sanders and Warren. This would be the progressive populist ticket offering the most bold and sweeping agenda.
The second model for a Democratic ticket would be led by former Vice President Joe Biden, running with a vice-presidential nominee such as Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) on a ticket that combines vast presidential calibre experience and a widely respected younger generation progressive leader.
The third model for a Democratic ticket would be led by Rep. Joe KennedyIII (D-Mass.), a rising star of House Democrats, running with a vice presidential nominee such as California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, who formerly served as chairman of the House Democratic Caucus in Congress, or Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.).
This ticket would offer a bold and daring move for dramatic political and generational change.
Behind the scenes of the national Democratic Party, it is commonly accepted wisdom, though not proven by facts, that the most progressive candidates are not the most electable candidates. In some states and districts this might be true.
Imagine if behind the scenes of the national Republican Party, it was commonly accepted wisdom that that the most RACIST candidates are the most electable. That is actually true, but it isn’t believed.
The Democrat belief in progressive candidates is dumb. It is just an analysis of the 2016 election from a superficial non-self-reflection perspective. They think Bernie could have won, and that Hillary lost because she wasn’t enough of a far-left communist. In fact, Hillary lost both because Trump was such a good candidate and because she was so corrupt. But if Bernie had won the nomination, he would have lost because he’s an unhinged communist.
But the Dems are going full-commie purity spiral – just kicking everything into hyperdrive.
But, in terms of winning the national popular vote and an electoral vote majority, there is a credible case that the most clearly progressive and politically aggressive Democrats can indeed win, and potentially win big.
The most important and powerfully persuasive data in modern American politics is that virtually every poll in 2016 showed Sanders defeating Donald Trump by 10 percent or more. In the Real Clear Politics summary of 2016 polling, Sanders ran ahead of Trump by an average margin of more than 10 percent and often by much larger margins.
Whether one supports Sanders or any other potential candidate in 2020, the case is clear that a strong progressive program and message would give Democrats a decided advantage in any campaign against the scandal-ridden and crony-capitalist-dominated presidency of Trump and his GOP allies in Congress.
…
While I could support Sanders, Warren or any of the progressive Democratic change candidates who could run on the ticket in 2020, it is important to disabuse the false notion, which is contrary to the facts demonstrated by national polling throughout 2016 and beyond, that progressive candidates are less electable.
Americans want a clear message of progressive change and would enthusiastically support a Sanders-Warren ticket, or any other ticket running on a similar program in 2020.
Whoever the Democratic nominee in 2020 is, he or she should, and almost certainly will, run a visionary and aggressive campaign that promises to bring the next great era of progressive leadership to America and could well realign American politics for a generation after the post-Trump era.
So.
I am going to predict right now that this line of thinking is going to win out in the DNC.
I don’t think they are going to nominate Sanders, because he’s so old, and he could well run into serious health problems over the next couple of years. I assume he did a lot of drugs in the 60s (though it may have just been LSD – I think he might still be regularly dropping acid before television appearances in fact).
But they are going to insist on some super leftist communist type agenda. Which will of course do better than Hillary’s neocon agenda with their remaining huwhite base, but which the colored folk who make up the majority of the party don’t care about and which middle-ground voters will never support.
This is how a presidential election works: you have 40% that is going to support one side no matter what on either side, then you have 20% that can be swayed. So your goal is both to get your own 40% to take the time to vote, and take as much of the middle 20% as you can. Going full “progressive” will not accomplish either of these goals. But it will get a whole lot of energy going, and make the Democrats think they’re doing well.
