Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
March 20, 2016
Rabid nation-wrecker William Kristol.
The entire purpose of Jewish Neo-Conservatism was to use the right-wing movement to push endless wars for Israel. They had no other goal, and they’ve said as much. As such, the existence of Hillary Clinton makes the Neo-Conservatism movement redundant, since the Jews would be hard-pressed to find a more militantly pro-Israel and pro-war candidate.
So it is no huge surprise that they are now ready to crash the GOP with no survivors.
In Saturday’s New York Times, there was a piece about how the Jew William Kristol – a leading figure in the neo-con movement and one of the main planners of the Iraq war – is plotting to run a third party candidate to ensure a Hillary win:
There is no longer room for error or delay, the anti-Trump forces say, and without a flawlessly executed plan of attack, he could well become unstoppable.
But should that effort falter, leading conservatives are prepared to field an independent candidate in the general election, to defend Republican principles and offer traditional conservatives an alternative to Mr. Trump’s hard-edged populism. They described their plans in interviews after Mr. Trump’s victories last Tuesday in Florida and three other states.
The names of a few well-known conservatives have been offered up in recent days as potential third-party standard-bearers, and William Kristol, editor of The Weekly Standard, has circulated a memo to a small number of conservative allies detailing the process by which an independent candidate could get on general-election ballots across the country.
Among the recruits under discussion are Tom Coburn, a former Oklahoma senator who has told associates that he would be open to running, and Rick Perry, the former Texas governor who was suggested as a possible third-party candidate at a meeting of conservative activists on Thursday in Washington.
roflmao.
Rick Perry.
They’d be better off to put his glasses on his dog and run the dog.
But oh, right – the purpose is to lose.
Mr. Coburn, who left the Senate early last year to receive treatment for cancer, said in an interview that Mr. Trump “needs to be stopped” and that he expected to back an independent candidate against him. He said he had little appetite for a campaign of his own, but did not flatly rule one out.
“I’m going to support that person,” Mr. Coburn said, “and I don’t expect that person to be me.”
Trump opponents convened a series of war councils last week to pinpoint his biggest vulnerabilities and consider whether to endorse one of his two remaining opponents, Senator Ted Cruz of Texas and Gov. John Kasich of Ohio.
…
David McIntosh, president of the conservative Club for Growth, which has spent millions on ads attacking Mr. Trump, said his group met on Wednesday and concluded it was still possible to avert Mr. Trump’s nomination. The group plans a comprehensive study of Trump supporters to sharpen a message aimed at driving them away from him.
“This is still a winnable race for a free-market conservative that’s not Donald Trump,” Mr. McIntosh said, adding, “It’s not a layup, but there’s a clear path to victory.”
Free market!
We must continue to lose half a trillion dollars to China every year!
Not doing that would be against principles!
For Republicans opposed to Mr. Trump under any circumstances, a third-party campaign offers a last refuge. Such a candidacy might gain support from high levels of the party: Mr. Romney has said he would be inclined to vote for a third candidate over Mr. Trump and Hillary Clinton.
Advisers to Michael R. Bloomberg, the former New York City mayor who considered an independent run, concluded that petition gathering would have to begin by early March for a candidate to appear on November ballots in all 50 states.
But an independent could still get on ballots in dozens of states — or perhaps seek the nomination of the Libertarian Party, which is already on the ballot in most states and does not pick a candidate until late May.
Mr. Kristol, a leading critic of Mr. Trump, said in an interview that he believed it was not too late to put forward a viable independent candidacy. “I think the ballot access question is manageable,” he said. “The big question is, who’s the candidate?”
At the meeting in Washington Thursday, Mr. Perry’s name was raised among several options, but his associates said that while he has fielded inquiries, he remains committed to backing Mr. Cruz.
Mr. Erickson described Mr. Perry as a “consensus choice” for an independent campaign: “He would win Texas and at least obstruct Trump.”
Well, there you have it.
Erick Erickson: The True Conservative.
They aren’t even pushing the idea that they are going to win with this third party. They are saying that the purpose of it is to “obstruct Trump” – meaning force a Hillary win.
I wonder how Erick Erickson’s readers over at Red State feel about him openly saying he wants Hillary to win over Trump?
This is where we’re at.
Whatever happens with this election, the GOP is finished.
And that’s something worth celebrating.
We know who Donald Trump is.