Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Sven Longshanks
Daily Stormer
October 3, 2014
The Cameron regime’s Home Secretary Theresa May has capitalized on the fears of home-grown Muslim terrorism to change existing laws to silence groups that are critical of our fake democracy.
She has defined ‘extremist activities’ as anything that is aimed at ‘overthrowing democracy,’ which includes just about every group that is critical of the current status quo.
She also came up with a new nonsensical phrase to describe these groups – ‘non-violent extremists’ – whatever that means.
Surely, if a group is non-violent, then they cannot be classed as extremist?
She has also made a point of linking Neo-Nazis with Muslim terrorists, whereas the only thing in common between the two groups is that they are both critical of Jews.
If people had any sense, they would realize that by doing this she is confirming that these new laws are for the benefit of the Jews, no one else.
She is basically saying that anyone who disagrees with our new Jewish definition of democracy is an extremist and needs to be silenced.
Radical Islamist extremists and neo-Nazis could be banned from making public appearances including on television under a gagging order proposed by the Conservatives with echoes of the broadcast ban that once applied to the voice of Gerry Adams.
Theresa May will announce the measure as part of a widely drawn counter-extremism strategy that is intended to catch so-called hate preachers such as Anjem Choudary, who was released on bail last week after being arrested on suspicion of encouraging terrorism.
The home secretary’s new orders would be aimed at those who undertake activities “for the purpose of overthrowing democracy”, a wide-ranging definition that could also catch a far wider range of political activists.
The “extremist asbos” are reminiscent of the 1980s broadcasting ban under which Sinn Féin spokesmen such as Adams were banned from the airwaves. Actors were used to voice the words of republicans and others with links to paramilitary groups in news reports.
May will also set out proposals to ban non-violent extremist groups that fall short of the current threshold for being banned as terrorist-related organisations.
The strategy is based on proposals that came out of David Cameron’s extremism working party set up following the murder of Lee Rigby in May last year.
The moves to ban extremist but non-violent groups and to introduce extremist asbos were blocked by the Liberal Democrats on freedom of speech grounds and so were not announced when Cameron proposed measures to tackle British jihadists travelling to Syria.
May will announce during the home affairs debate at the Tory conference that the new powers will be included in the party’s manifesto for next year’s election.
In the debate, May and Chris Grayling, the justice secretary, will reaffirm their hostility to the European court of human rights and the Human Rights Act. Grayling will renew his pledge that Britain’s supreme court will no longer be overruled by Strasbourg.
He will also highlight his recent next-term commitment to set up a network of specialist mental health centres in prisons across England and Wales.
May’s extremist disruption civil orders would contain wide-ranging restrictions on individuals who “undertake harmful activities” to spread, incite or justify hatred against people on grounds of race, religion, sexual orientation or disability.
The orders would be issued by a high court judge on an application from the police on the lower legal test of “balance of probabilities” rather than the stronger test of “beyond reasonable doubt”.
The restrictions are expected to include banning individuals from speaking at public events, protests and meetings, having to inform the police in advance of any public event, protest or meeting that they plan to attend, and banning individuals from particular public locations.
So if they think there is a possibility that you might say something they don’t like, they can silence you before you even say it.
Even more alarming is the way a sentence about putting ‘specialist mental health centres in prisons’ has been stuck in there amongst the new speech restrictions.
It looks like they may be intending to give that specialist mental health treatment to all those who disagree with their genocidal agenda.
A Clockwork Orange, anyone?
