This Killer Should Not be Free to Stay in the UK

Daily Stormer
April 25, 2014

Ann Widdecombe has inadvertently pointed out that the very premise for having a government in the first place seems to have been forgotten, as we deliberately put our people in harm’s way by accepting murderous asylum seekers to stay in our countries.

From the Express:

A man who cannot be named for legal reasons but referred to as JR arrived in this country at 15 on a temporary visa to visit his mother. Refused permission to stay, he did anyway and a few months later stabbed a schoolboy of 15 to death over a drug debt.

He was jailed and, upon release, appealed against deportation. That appeal was rightly rejected so he appealed again, stating for the first time in this long saga that it would be dangerous for him to return to Jamaica because he is gay.

Astoundingly this appeal has been upheld so this nasty murderer is free to stay in Britain, despite the best efforts of Theresa May to get rid of him.

There is now so much anxiety about large numbers of lawful migrants from eastern Europe that we have begun to forget just how badly abused our asylum laws are and this case should act as a sharp reminder.

Any illegal immigrant has only to utter three words: I claim asylum. Then he or she will stay in the country while the claim is assessed and as we have no identity cards, a flourishing black economy and make limited use of detention it is a very easy country in which to disappear.

Now they are more likely to just say that they are gay. There have even been instances of immigrants showing border Police mobile phone videos of themselves engaging in sodomy, to prove they have ‘a right to stay in Britain’.

The international convention governing asylum was enacted to prevent any repetition of the appalling events of the 1930s when boatloads of Jews had been turned away at port after port, with the result that many perished in horrendous circumstances under the Nazi regime.

Actually the boat loads of Jews were escorted by the Nazis to Palestine in safety and according to their own population figures, they did not ‘perish’ but actually increased in number during the war.

International law now says that anybody fleeing persecution must be given a safe haven and nobody must be sent back to his country of origin if it would put him in danger. That was just, but the world has moved on since 1951 when that decree came into being.

Then there was very little civilian air travel but now people can cross the globe in 24 hours. Then there was only limited television but now anyone in the Third World eking out an existence in a makeshift hut, with tarpaulin for a roof if lucky, can see daily images of the West, where even the poorest are housed and adequately fed, where the shops are piled high with goods and the schools have roofs on.

That understandably is what they want for their own families.

In 1951 large tracts of the Third World were still colonised and run peaceably. The withdrawal of the West over succeeding years gave rise to wars, genocide and persecution and, more frequently, the collapse of economies under incompetent and corrupt regimes.

The impetus to escape was huge and Britain is seen as a soft touch, which is why the people at Sangatte do not apply to stay in France but spend their days trying to get unlawfully into Britain.

We will not stop the abuse of our asylum system until we automatically detain all new applicants so that we know where they are, until immigration officers routinely meet planes so that they know exactly which country asylum seekers have come from and until we deport those who commit serious crimes.

After all, if they need safety it should not be granted at the expense of the safety of our own nationals. I am sorry if JR would suffer in Jamaica for being gay but I am vastly more sorry for the teenage victim who died at his hands.

This should be the case with all immigration, none of it is justifiable as it puts the safety of our own nationals at risk, whether from asylum seekers or economic migrants. They are our biological competitors and every breath they take on our land puts us at risk, as the recent quarantining of a coloniser’s hospital in Italy proves.

The first duty of government is to keep its citizens from harm.

If the government stops doing that, then it is no longer fit for purpose.