TIME Magazine Elects Jamal Khashoggi as “Man of the Year”

Andrew Anglin December 11, 2018

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
December 11, 2018

They didn’t actually elect Jamal Khashoggi specifically as “man of the year.” He’s the one in the headlines, but they apparently elected “journalists, generally.”

They changed “man” to “person” a while ago, now it is always groups of people. Last year it was the metoo skanks.

TIME Magazine is such a piece of shit. No one reads it, like no one watches the Oscars, but the “man/person/group of the year” is still considered culturally relevant for historical reasons.

Washington Post:

Time magazine has announced its 2018 Person of the Year is “The Guardians,” four individuals and one group — all journalists — who this year helped expose “the manipulation and the abuse of truth” around the world.

They are the journalist Jamal Khashoggi, the Washington Post contributing columnist who was killed inside Saudi Arabia’s consulate in Istanbul in October; the staff of the Capital Gazette newspaper in Maryland; journalist Maria Ressa, the CEO of the Rappler news website, who has been made a legal target in the Philippines; and journalists Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe Oo, who have been jailed in Myanmar for nearly a year for their work exposing the mass killing of Rohingya Muslims.

“As we looked at the choices, it became clear that the manipulation and the abuse of truth is really the common thread in so many of this year’s major stories, from Russia to Riyadh to Silicon Valley,” Time magazine editor Edward Felsenthal said on the “Today” show Tuesday morning, where the announcement was made.

Special counsel Robert S. Mueller III, who is investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election, was third and President Trump was runner-up, Felsenthal said.

“There’s always a strong case for the president of the United States, particularly this president,” Felsenthal said.

Yeah, okay.

I sort of understand this, in light of last year’s “group” – all four of those journalists share the thing in common that they are oppressed/repressed. Although none of them was really a big deal other than Khashoggi. I honestly didn’t even remember the Filipino bitch, and no one cared about those Reuters Burmese.

It obviously should have been either Mueller or Trump, as those were clearly the two most influential individuals of current year (note that this is what it is supposed to be: the person who had the biggest effect on the year, not someone they like, necessarily).

But they chose to push something that matters to them as journalists.

This again shows that journalists are a priest class, that compulsively sticks together and defends one another. I wrote a thing about that a while ago, which I think was good and is relevant here.

They don’t actually care about the truth, obviously. Moreover, they don’t really care about anything specific. Khashoggi was an agent of the Moslem Brotherhood, which I doubt most Jews/journalists support, generally. His WaPo columns – and there were not very many of them – all argued that every Moslem country was naturally Islamic, so if you want to give them democracy, you have to accept that they will vote for Islamic politicians who will impose Sharia law. Most journalists, if asked, I would assume do not agree with this particular contention.

I don’t really even understand why he was writing for WaPo.

“I’ll raise your herp two derps.” -Jamal Khashoggi

But they will all defend each other, no matter what. They view themselves, creepily, as the deciders of reality. A special group that deserves special privileges. “A priest class” really is the best way to communicate the image they have of themselves, and as you can see with this TIME decision, they view themselves as a global phenomenon.

The Burmese and the Flip chick are fighting anti-Islamic Buddhists and Duterte, respectively. These are clear enemies of the Jews. But Khashoggi was fighting Saudi Arabia, a great ally of the Jews. Obviously, they were able to flip this and make it about Donald Trump, but now they’re trying to cut off money to Saudi – money that is effectively going to Israel.

Again, I want to say that President Trump should have and still should simply cut Saudi off. There is no reason for him to keep going to bat for Israel when it is 100% clear that this does not help him in anyway. In defending Saudi, he is literally defending the Jews against the Jews. It makes absolutely no sense.

In reporting this TIME cover, WaPo took the time to attack Trump, including this tweet in their piece:

That is a Jew from Vox.

Funnily enough, Jamal’s uncle, the infamous billionaire arms dealer Adnan Khashoggi, was once on the cover of TIME.

That was from January of 1987, back when they were still considered a respectable publication to flip through in the lobby of the dentist’s office.

Now, they’ve basically gone the same way as Newsweek – they’ve become a shitty clickbait website that attempts to compete with Buzzfeed. They fail, like Newsweek fails.

Look at how much their traffic has dropped in the last year:

For comparison, Newsweek:

Breitbart is burying both of them:

For further reference, here’s Infowars:

My broke ass would probably be ranking higher than Newsweek if they hadn’t stolen my domain. If I had payment processing and access to the rest of the mainstream services, we’d be in the top 500 (somewhere around Breitbart). No joke. Right-wing ideas are a lot more popular than left-wing ideas, especially among people who read the news.

The only legacy media that is really relevant is:

  1. New York Times
  2. CNN
  3. Washington Post
  4. The Guardian

In that order.

And those have only held on because they’ve had so much money poured into them.

© Copyright Daily Stormer 2023, All Rights Reserved -- Join the Daily Stormer site chat for future updates in case of further domain seizure.