Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
November 6, 2016
At Obama’s request, New Era has begun manufacturing tinfoil fitted hats; the President said that he “wans to be rollin lyk da fer rill nigga whys ah bee perteks muh blackass frum dey Rassen space beams, muffuggun shieeett bitch.”
Yes, it does just keep getting dumber.
Without any evidence for the first Russian conspiracy claims, they are now building on those claims with other baseless claims.
Wall Street Journal:
A Russian-backed hacking effort that has rocked the presidential campaign may peak on Election Day, but is likely to continue next year and into 2018 as Moscow seeks to influence U.S. politics and key elections in Europe, Obama administration officials warn.
Notice that WSJ does not say “alleged” – they just state it as a fact that Russians are hacking elections, even while the evidence for this claim remains at exactly zero.
Literally zero. They have not even presented circumstantial evidence to support the theory. It’s just “well, we think they are doing this…”
But they don’t need evidence, because the Jew media doesn’t ask for it.
Russian meddling, in fact, may become more potent in Europe than in the U.S., White House officials and other experts say, because Moscow has long courted political figures there, and has forged ties with euroskeptic political parties strengthened by the recent influx of migrants and refugees.
Yes. It may.
And a gigantic spaceship filled with intelligent dinosaurs may crash land in Idaho tomorrow.
Your digital freezer may become sentient and try to trap you inside of it.
All sorts of things may happen. But this is not how governments are supposed to make policy or plan world wars.
Upcoming contests in Europe include Dutch elections in March, French presidential elections in April and May, and German elections in the fall. Moscow is hoping that gains by Kremlin-friendly parties like France’s National Front could help Russia break free of some of the diplomatic isolation and sanctions imposed on Moscow after its seizure of the Ukrainian peninsula of Crimea in 2014, Kremlin watchers say.
“The German elections, the French elections and other elections in the coming year all have big geopolitical implications for Russia,” said Pasi Eronen, Russia project researcher at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, a Washington-based think tank.
If I didn’t know better, I would think governments are planning to use their stated belief in a huge Russian conspiracy to promote far-right and nationalist parties in order to stage their own conspiracy to discredit election victories by far-right and nationalist parties.
If we are to use Occam’s Razor, it is a whole lot more likely that they are planning their own conspiracy than that they actually believe in this insane conspiracy they are promoting.
Although large-scale interference from the Kremlin is relatively new to the U.S., Mr. Eronen said Russia has been active in Europe for the past two years with hacking and disinformation campaigns designed to weaken those the Kremlin considers to be political rivals.
Evidence?
Why is WSJ not asking for evidence?
The Daily Stormer is asking for evidence.
Officials say that even if Russia fails to elect its own allies in European elections next year, the sustained meddling in the U.S. and Europe will serve a long-term Kremlin goal—namely, to put Russian President Vladimir Putin’s perceived foes in the West in disarray, making it easier for him to safely reseat himself as Russian president when his country holds elections in 2018.
U.S. and European observers have criticized previous elections under Mr. Putin as rigged and marred by obvious fraud—criticism that Mr. Putin has described as a veiled attempt to overthrow him.
Mr. Putin hopes to inoculate himself against such criticism by sowing so much chaos in U.S. and European elections before then that Western leaders will be too preoccupied with domestic problems to spend much effort criticizing the Russian poll, one senior White House official said.
So he’s involved in rigging global elections because… so he can rig his own nation’s elections?
Am I missing something here?
By hacking and dumping emails, Russia is trying “to denigrate the American electoral system, to make it look chaotic, make it look manipulable, make it look subject to intrusion, cheating and vulnerable so you can’t trust it…to make us look no better than the Russian electoral system,” the official said.
Why doesn’t Putin sue these people for libel?
They would have to prove this stuff in court.
If the West criticizes Putin’s re-election in 2018, Russia’s response will be, “‘Yeah, you’re not so good either,’” the White House official said, calling the Russian strategy “a long-term challenge that the United States is going to have to deal with and probably other countries, including those in Europe, [will have] to take seriously.”
Russia has dismissed allegations that it has tried to influence elections outside its borders or that it has anything to do with the hacking of Democratic Party emails this year. But senior U.S. intelligence officials have said repeatedly they are convinced the Russian government stole and then leaked emails in an effort to interfere with the U.S. elections.
It was a phishing email.
A phishing email.
Anyone could have done it. It only takes one guy.
They say that conclusion is based on digital evidence left behind in the hacks and the way the information was leaked, which closely mirrors how Russia has tried to interfere in previous elections in Europe. Although the hacks into Democratic Party computer systems were performed months ago, the data was parceled out in the past few weeks on the eve of voting, apparently when it would have maximum impact.
By Julian Assange.
Because Moscow is more likely trying to disrupt U.S. politics than to elect any specific candidate, more emails may be dumped after the elections, said Tom Graham, managing director of Kissinger Associates in New York and former White House adviser on Russia to President George W. Bush.
“The national nightmare might only be beginning,” he said.
Yeah.
If Hillary Clinton prevails in the vote, the Russians may choose to dump more information about her afterward to raise a clamor for impeachment proceedings, Mr. Graham said. Or the Kremlin may hang on to some particularly damaging information and privately show it to the White House in a blackmail attempt, he said.
LOL
Admission that there is information that could get the bitch impeached or blackmailed.
Shouldn’t the people know about this?
I mean, seriously: even if Russia was responsible for these “hacks” (no evidence of actual hacking so far), wouldn’t they be heroes of democracy by exposing all of this corruption in the system?
The Clinton argument is literally: “yes, we are criminals, but you shouldn’t know that, and it is wrong for anyone to show you this fact.”
It’s not a great argument.
