Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
June 26, 2017
Well, it turns out people who enjoy watching gigantic robots fight each other are not the same sort of people who like being lectured by uppity little spic skanks.
Transformers 5 released a first trailer which mainly featured a greasy and empowered jailbait wetback lecturing males.
Bulletpoint summary:
- Beta nice guy is trying to get up on that, wetbackess humilities him in front of his friends (man-shaming, he was just being nice, she could have politely lied about having a boyfriend)
- Wetbackess gives lecture about how people oppressed her because she’s a girl
- Wetbackess is stronk
- Mark Wahlberg calls her “little J-Lo” (racism?)
- “Yeah, I fight like a girl – don’t you?” (this means girls fight gigantic robots better than men… I think)
- Final 25% is robot stuff
Pictorial summary of the trailer:
Presumably, people reacted to this first trailer like, “what in the fuck is this shit? I am trying to watch gigantic robots fight one another, not get lectured by some uppity jailbait spic.”
From the skank’s Wikipedia page:
Isabela Moner was born in Cleveland, Ohio. She is the daughter of Katherine, who was born in Lima, Peru, and Patrick Moner, who was born in Louisiana. Moner has stated that she considers herself more Peruvian than American.
wew.
No doubt due to overwhelming negative feedback, they released a second trailer that doesn’t hardly feature the skank at all – certainly no “empowered” bits – and instead has Anthony Hopkins somehow relating the gigantic robots to Camelot and King Arthur. Also, Optimus Prime has a moral dilemma regarding whether to save Earth or Cybertron. It’s non-stop robots, explosions AND medieval battles.
Bulletpoint summary:
- FUCK YEAH ROBOTS, EXPLOSIONS, GIRLS AND MEDIEVAL SWORDs SHIT YEAH!
Pictorial summary:
Instead of getting a feminist lecture from the skank, we get jiggling titties.
[Editor’s Note: this happens at 00:50 in the above clip – put it on slow-mo, this is some serious bouncing – like, they look like implants. Wikipedia says she’s 15 now, so she probably would have been 14 when it was filmed and she would have had to have had the surgery at least a couple months before – would that be a scandal? A 14-year-old getting breast implants for a Transformers film? (Probably not, it wasn’t a scandal 20 years ago when Brittany Spears’ mom made her get implants at 16.) Also, could be CGI. I don’t know. What I do know is that the focus of this two seconds of footage is on bouncing breasts in a low cut shirt which seem oversized for a 14-year-old and bounce in an exaggerated fashion. nb4 moralfag says “oh Anglin you perv talking about 14-year-old wetbackess’ titties” – I didn’t make this film. You’re going to have to take that argument up with Michael Bay (yes, he is Jewish).]
Also, an attractive white female is introduced, who doesn’t give a lecture.
Also, a lot more Mark Wahlberg – who everybody likes – than the first trailer (in the first trailer, he was just getting bullied by the empowered wetbackess).
Also, our male hero gets the girl.
This is to say, the second trailer showed what people want to see in a transformers film – a bunch of robots fighting, stuff blowing up, outer space shit, an attractive female lead – PLUS the added bonus new element of some Camelot swords vs. robots stuff AND Anthony Hopkins.
Transformers movies are not meant to be good, they are meant to be mindless and absurd. They are the type of thing that a lot of people want/need as a coping mechanism in the modern world – a break. The exact opposite of what people want in these films is a feminist lecture.
They are sold to two groups:
- Boys, aged 7-13
- Men, who want to be able to feel like a boy aged 7-13 for two hours in order to get the stress of modern reality lifted off of their shoulders for two hours
And so, troubles.
How the mighty bots have fallen.
Paramount and Michael Bay’s Transformers: The Last Knight grossed $69.1 million from 4,069 theaters in its five-day debut at the North American box office, a franchise low and casting doubt on the future of the series. That figure includes a Friday-Sunday take of $45.3 million.
The Last Knight, which Paramount says cost $217 million to make before a major marketing spend, is the latest summer sequel to spring an oil leak, at least in the U.S., coming in 31 percent behind Transformers: Age of Extinction (2014). And it is the first Transformers movie not to open to $100 million or more.
The only explanation for such a massive drop for the fifth installment of such a popular series is the moralizing feminist message in the original trailer, which was distributed much, much wider than the second “OOPS SORRY THIS IS ACTUALLY WHAT WE MEANT” trailer.
Everyone knows what these movies are, and there is a group of people – myself included, I ain’t even gonna lie – who enjoy watching these movies for the very simple reason that they are fun for the sake of being fun, and do not have any type of heavy-handed moral message.
But, apparently, we’ve just gone too far into the bottomless pit that everything is being choked out by the smoke.
You can’t have a fun movie with explosions and robots and pre-surgery Megan Fox and instead you have to be socially indoctrinated with Jewish gobbledygook by some nagging jailbait spic.
Addendum
I just want to say here that Megan Fox’ “transformation” (PUN NOT INTENDED) is one of the most horrible things I am aware of a woman ever having done to herself. Seriously, she should have just committed suicide.
Do you guys remember how hot she was in the first one?
I remember thinking “wow, that is one of the best looking women I have ever seen in my life.”
Why did she try to make herself into an IRL plastic version of Betty Boop?
Sick new monster face:
Disgusting cantaloupe tits:
PLUS she covered herself in tattoos that were so awful magazines were literally photoshopping them out!
They’re all like – quotes.
I am 100% against breast implants for the reason that they make it so the woman can’t breastfeed. Women exist to produce babies and nurture. Besides looking nice and cooking food, that is literally the only reason women exist. So effectively, breast implants destroy a woman’s ability to fulfill her primary function. (Interesting Note: If this wetbackess above got them at 14, that would also have been before her breasts were fully grown, which could cause tissue deformity.)
HOWEVER WITH THAT SAID – I can understand why large women with totally flat chests do get implants. I am able to sympathize with such bitches. Although I think actually they can just wear padded bras, as it is effectively the same thing these days. The men who see you naked would probably universally prefer a flat chest to fake breasts, because fake breasts are disgusting outside of clothing. So the only real excuse for fake breasts is low-cut shirts, as far as I can tell.
THAT HAVING BEEN SAID – Megan Fox is 5’4″ and was not totally flat chested. She had breasts that fit her body size. Obviously, no one was bothered by her breast size, because she was starring in multi-million dollar films.
The facial transformation is even more inexplicable.
This is like vandalizing a great work of classic art. She didn’t create her own body, the genes of her ancestors did. Modern women have this whole “MY BODY, MY CHOICE” ideology, but in reality, an individual does not have any innate right to destroy their own body. People, in a society, are the collective property of one another. That’s why suicide is illegal.
They had to cut her out of the Transformer series after her surgery extravaganza because she couldn’t play the same character anymore, and she looked like such a mutant no one would want to see her in a movie anyway.
You don’t even see her anymore, do you?
She went from being the hottest new actress that everyone wanted to see to being nowhere AFTER doing surgery on herself that she thought would make her look BETTER!
The point I am trying to make here is: women are both terminally insecure and terminally stupid.
Which is probably why no one wants to be lectured by them in movies.