Trump Finally Calling Out Kike Rosenstein for Telling Him to Fire Someone and Then Investigating Him for It

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
June 17, 2017

Trump finally made some good tweets.

Yeah, I wonder what’s going on with that Rod Rosenberg guy, huh?

Why would he recommend you fire someone and then investigate you for doing it – what a strange, puzzling maneuver.

Why would he purposefully try to kike you like this?

What is his deal?

Here’s the thing.

This is the order of screw-up – both chronological and of magnitude:

  1. “Admitting” that maybe/probably Russia did Wikileaks
  2. Firing Flynn because the Jew media said to
  3. Sessions recusing

One thing led to the next led to the next led to Syria strike, led to all policies being reversed, led to five weeks of quiet of the Jewish front.

Then the Comey firing and the Lavrov meeting, and trying to repair the damage.

Well, Trump SHOULD go back and attack the original claim that Russia did Wikileaks.

They say 17 intelligence agencies.

Well, the only piece of evidence they claim to have is that CrowdStrike – a private company hired by the DNC – said it was so.

And CrowdStrike has now recounted that, which Comey didn’t acknowledge in his testimony. Rubio or Cotton or some other GOP person could have pressed him, but they all want the same Russia narrative, and at best don’t care how it effects Trump, at worst want Trump impeached and replaced with Pence (which is definitely the better part of the GOP).

Sessions also could have made a bigger point of the fact he’s seen no evidence to support the theory.

“Well, 17 intelligence agencies wouldn’t just lie, goyim,” is not a good argument. I don’t think it is an argument that would sway the 50% of the people who now view Trump favorably, especially as the economy continues to get better. Trump has already openly said Comey lied under oath – why not accuse all of the rest of these people?

I don’t know why this is complicated. Trump’s approval rating is good now, because people hate the media. So demand the intelligence agencies present not the evidence for collusion, but the evidence for Wikileaks itself.

Assange would probably agree to more interviews on the topic. He can’t give his source but he said it wasn’t Russia.

It was probably Seth Rich, the dead DNC staffer.

And where is this server? Was it destroyed? I don’t even know.