Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
May 5, 2019
UPDATE/CORRECTION:
PJW actually did tweet in support of me.
Daily Stormer hates me & attacks me, but banning websites for opinions (no matter how vile) is a slippery slope to total censorship.
— Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) August 14, 2017
I didn’t ever see that.
But the point still stands, whether he made no tweets or a single mention: me being literally banned from the entire internet should have been recognized for what it was: a crucial point in history, a foreshadowing of what we are seeing now. Watson in this tweet even says “slippery slope.” But none of them wanted to make a deal of it. Because of the Jew thing.
Though I don’t see why the Jews are such a big deal to these people, since there is no evidence they have any power.
Original article follows.
Donald Trump is whining about censorship again.
So surprised to see Conservative thinkers like James Woods banned from Twitter, and Paul Watson banned from Facebook! https://t.co/eHX3Z5CMXb
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 3, 2019
Funny he called Paul Joseph Watson “Paul Watson.”
Watson is such a faggot for using his middle name like that. Who does that? It’s almost gayer than the cocks he sucks.
I can’t stand this faggot. When I was banned from everything, he refused to tweet in support of me. Or even mention me, ever. In fact, almost all of these people who claim to support free speech refused to support me. I told them all “you dumb motherfuckers have to know that you’re next.” If they had drawn a line at me getting kicked off the entire internet – ostensibly for a fat joke – we wouldn’t be in this situation now of just everyone getting banned from everything.
The only people who supported me (who are outside of our immediate thing) were:
- Tucker Carlson
- Sargon of Akkad
- Tim Pool
Trump also retweeted Watson and Lauren Southern, who are the only two people I know of who have been banned from Facebook and not Twitter (typically, Twitter is much more aggressive than Facebook).
Here are the tweets he retweeted:
The support for me has been incredible. This could actually lead to some genuine change. Keep up the pressure. Don't let it rest.
— Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) May 4, 2019
When did we quit teaching/understanding that free speech means protecting the distasteful, lest we open the door for govt/3d parties to decide that whatever they oppose is "distasteful" and therefore to be banned? #SlipperySlope
— Sharyl Attkisson?️♂️ (@SharylAttkisson) May 4, 2019
When did we decide, as Americans, that it's ok fo govt & 3d parties to censor/ curate our info? That we cannot be trusted with unfiltered info? That we shd only be able to find info that *they* tell us is true on matters that are opinion or in legitimate dispute? #SlipperySlope
— Sharyl Attkisson?️♂️ (@SharylAttkisson) May 4, 2019
Those suggesting Facebook can ban anyone for any reason because they are a private company do not understand the platform/publisher distinction or the special legal protections afforded the former.
— Jeremy Boreing (@JeremyDBoreing) May 3, 2019
Lmao at establishment conservatives who think they won’t be labeled the new “dangerous” / “extremist” voices when those to the right of them are all banned. Good luck with that one guys ??
— Lauren Southern (@Lauren_Southern) May 3, 2019
So James Woods was kicked off Twitter for quoting Ralph Waldo Emerson…but @TalbertSwan the racist fake man of God, that’s SUPPOSED to be permanently banned for hate speech is back on? What have you to say @jack @Twitter ?https://t.co/SqXu8xWhQV
— Mindy Robinson ?? (@iheartmindy) April 30, 2019
“Dangerous”.
My opinions?
Or giving a handful of giant partisan corporations the power to decide who has free speech?
You decide.https://t.co/cTCoLs0Op2
— Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) May 2, 2019
Trump brought up the issue again on Saturday.
How can it be possible that James Woods (and many others), a strong but responsible Conservative Voice, is banned from Twitter? Social Media & Fake News Media, together with their partner, the Democrat Party, have no idea the problems they are causing for themselves. VERY UNFAIR!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 4, 2019
I seriously doubt anything is going to happen.
If he tweeted about something and then something was actually done about it, that would be a first.
He is not so much a doer as he is a tweeter.
And the most fucked up part is that the only reason we are all getting banned is because of him. Basically, the media credited us with winning Trump the 2016 election. That is why they cracked down. It was the first time they realized the ability of independent voices to affect national politics.
They also created the entire “rising Alt-Right threat” phenomenon. Basically, Hillary and the media planned to use it as a way to attack Trump during the election. Then the media decided to make Richard Spencer this evil villain figure after the election as a way to attack Trump. They eventually realized they were just promoting us, and just started shutting everything down because too many goyim were knowing.
But if Trump had not run for president, we would still just be a steadily growing internet subculture, ignored by the media instead of censored.
So he has a responsibility here more than anywhere else. We sacrificed our internet freedom to support him. And many people sacrificed their physical freedom to support him and are now in jail.
And all he’s done is tweet.
The only upshot of him tweeting about this is that it makes it difficult for the cuckservative movement and their spokesthots to try to astroturf conservative support for destroying free speech in America.
They are going to try their best, but their best really isn’t very good at all, and “here’s why you should support yourself being censored: values and principles” is a very hard sell.
Because it isn’t just e-celebs being censored. They are just censoring everyone now. They have a plan to censor 100 million people.