Trump vs the CIA: Jew-Run Spy Agency Makes Hard Push with Russian Hacking Hoax Report!

Eric Striker
Daily Stormer
January 7, 2017

As predicted, the now declassified Russian hacking report is a pack of unsubstantiated and vague lies.

The 25-page DNI report was written using information collected under the auspices of the Jewish warmonger and CIA Deputy Director David S. Cohen. Little attention has been given to Cohen and his blatant conflict of interest in this concocted scandal. Cohen’s appointment to the agency by Obama in February 2015 is bizarre and obviously a case of pay-to-play, as he has no military experience, and his military intelligence work was second-rate at best prior to his placement.

Previously, this Jew worked at the Treasury Department a degree away from the (((money printers))), and used his position to make a name for himself from the shadows as the architect of numerous aggressive neo-con anti-Iran and anti-Russia policies in Washington, DC.

Cohen was also one of the advisors guiding George W. Bush in the writing of the Patriot Act, which shows how little he cares about the civil liberties of Gentile Americans. This dangerous individual was made one of the most important and powerful figures in the “intelligence community” overnight, and has engaged in a passive strategy of tension to undermine and de-legitimize the election of Donald Trump.

The New York Times has a friendly take on the CIA report, while admitting that it contradicts itself.

New York Times:

American intelligence officials have concluded that the president of Russia, Vladimir V. Putin, personally “ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the U.S. presidential election,” and turned from seeking to “denigrate” Hillary Clinton to developing “a clear preference for President-elect Trump.”

The conclusions were part of a declassified intelligence report, ordered by President Obama, that was released on Friday.

The report, a damning and surprisingly detailed account of Russia’s efforts to undermine the American electoral system and Mrs. Clinton in particular, went on to assess that Mr. Putin had “aspired to help President-elect Trump’s election chances when possible by discrediting Secretary Clinton and publicly contrasting her unfavorably to him.”

The report described a broad campaign that included covert operations, including cyberactivities and “trolling” on the internet of people who were viewed as opponents of Russia’s effort. While it accused Russian intelligence agencies of obtaining and maintaining “access to elements of multiple U.S. state or local electoral boards,” it concluded — as officials have publicly — that there was no evidence of tampering with the tallying of the vote on Nov. 8.

But the declassified report contained no information about how the agencies had collected their data or had come to their conclusions. So it is bound to be attacked by skeptics and by partisans of Mr. Trump, who see the review as a political effort to impugn the legitimacy of his election. Intelligence officials have rejected that view.

How can a report be a “damning and detailed account” of Russia stealing the election for Donald Trump while simultaneously having no evidence whatsoever behind such a conclusion?

Easy: (((they’re))) all lying. But these lies are insidious, as they seek to strike a nerve among the Tom Clancy reading patriotard segment of the American population they assume voted for Trump and would fight for him, though they may be speaking to ghosts, as it hasn’t succeeded so-far.

Assange’s claim that it does not come from a state source is at least as credible as the “intelligence report.”

The only truthful claim of the DNI report is that the Russian government funds RT. A large portion of the “intelligence report” in fact is spent ranting about them.

But even if Russia Today’s politically partisan information campaign throughout the election swayed opinions, this is not a crime under either domestic or international law. The United States itself has been using the tactic of spreading fake news since the Cold War, with the NATO equivalent of RT being “Radio Free Europe.” It’s not Vladimir Putin’s fault that the luster of blue jeans, rock n roll and Coca Cola in exchange for accepting globalization has lost favor in most of the world.

America is losing the information war world wide because its worldview – represented by Hillary Clinton – is weak and unappealing, hence losing the election. This sentiment has now reached the United States itself, with RT being seen as an island of truth by the masses only because the mainstream outlets (CNN, NYT, Washington Post) revealed themselves as brazen hacks serving the status quo.

The Washington Post itself has been in a frenzy of anti-Russian news, all of it green-lit or even ordered by (((Marty Baron))), including publishing fantastic works of fiction so embarrassing it has been forced to retract.

Trump knows what’s going on and trying to stave these jackals off. He remains defiant, much to the chagrin of the heavily discredited Jewish media; nobody expected him to take a stand like this.

New York Times:

While Mr. Trump’s statement on Friday that he had a constructive meeting with senior intelligence officials on the Russian hacking issue was a step in the right direction, his disparagement of American intelligence officers over the last few months is likely to cause significant damage to the C.I.A.

Mr. Trump has questioned the agency’s competence — repeatedly asking, often via Twitter, how we can trust the organization that incorrectly judged that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction (criticism that, in my mind, is unfair for an agency that has changed dramatically in the last 15 years). But he has also accused the agency of being biased and political, implying, in comments to The Times, that the C.I.A. manufactured its Russia analysis to undercut him. Mr. Trump, in essence, said that the agency’s officers were dishonorable. To the men and women of the C.I.A., sworn to protect the nation, this was a gut punch.

Nevertheless, the Jews and their minions are running with it. On the Democratic side, (((Congressman Adam Schiff))) has been the most belligerent entity on this front, even attacking Obama for being “too weak.” When actually challenged on his hacking claims (something the system-journalists haven’t done) on the Tucker Carlson show, Schiff melted like a vampire disinfected by sunlight.

On the GOP side, Butt-Goy extraordinaire Tom Cotton, and the cutest couple on capitol hill, McGraham , are heavily concern trolling Trump, while at the same time outright calling for a world war over the public getting to see John Podesta’s emails.

CNN:

Sen. John McCain said Friday that Russia’s alleged meddling in the 2016 presidential election amounted to an “act of war.”

The Arizona Republican, who is chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, also has scheduled a hearing for next week on foreign cyberthreats to the US, which will also focus on Russian cyberhacking, a committee aide told CNN earlier Friday.

McCain, who is one of Washington’s most prominent foreign policy hardliners, has criticized the recent sanctions and expulsions announced by the Obama administration this week as insufficient and belated. He made his latest comments in Ukraine, a nation threatened by a resurgent Russia, after meeting with Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko.

“When you attack a country, it’s an act of war,” McCain said of the recent hackings on Ukrainian TV, according to a transcript compiled by Reuters. “And so we have to make sure that there is a price to pay so that we can perhaps persuade Russians to stop this kind of attacks on our very fundamentals of democracy.”

The situation Trump is in is incredibly precarious. This may be the climax of the system’s attempt to block him from the presidency, by either impeaching him, assassinating him or even painting him into a corner through rogue CIA agents provoking a war with Russia.

CIA a Rogue Agency

There is a strong precedent for the CIA undermining the president.

Mark Gorton’s acclaimed and scholarly Fifty Years of the Deep State documents how the 1977 House of Representatives Select Committee on Assassinations ordered by Jimmy Carter to look into the CIA’s off-the-record operations led to the dismissal of a whole class of intelligence officials, including George H.W. Bush. Carter had them resign rather than thrown up against the wall and shot for treason, which led to Bush returning to Washington as Ronald Reagan’s vice President and defeating Carter in a landslide by putting into motion conditions leading to the Iran hostage crisis.

Trump must launch an investigation into the CIA or suffer what else it has in store for him if this Russian hacking hoax doesn’t stick (it won’t).

As for the story itself, aside from the fact that it’s a forgery with no clear methodology and obviously driven by an agenda (either antagonizing Russia or taking down Trump), in the end, the every day person’s response to this story is: “Who cares?”

Fight back Trump!

The people are with you!

The only solution to deeply compacted institutional Jewry threatening American national security is a political enema – drain the swamp!