Adrian Sol
Daily Stormer
October 20, 2017
While my own suggestion of creating a great minefield patrolled by killer chainsaw drones was rejected, I can admit that the Mexico border wall prototypes currently being looked at are pretty nice.
Maybe for the Canadian border? We need to keep out those polar bears, after all. Not to mention, Trudeau voters.
What are we going to use to keep out the beaner hordes, though?
As workers nearly complete the first prototypes of President Trump’s border wall, next week the Department of Homeland Security will begin testing which designs best deter and prevent illegal immigrants from entering the U.S.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection awarded eight contracts to six companies to build the prototypes. Four are made of reinforced concrete, the others involve alternate materials, mostly steel.
Each model is 18 to 30 feet high and 30 feet long. Contractors have until Oct. 26 to complete their design before testing begins. All of the construction is taking place a few miles east of San Diego.
Testing will include how long it takes to scale the barrier, or breach it using a concrete saw or jackhammer. Do the designs contain sensors? If so, can the prototype alert agents when someone is trying to breach, scale or dig beneath the wall?
Please set up cameras and livestream the invaders trying to climb these. The wall will fund itself that way.
Why is that important? Border patrol agents say a fence, wall or barrier – call it what you want – only buys time. Every wall can be breached. Agents need appropriate roads to reach any area along the border in a matter of minutes to interdict or apprehend an individual.
The question for evaluators will be: one, what design works best for the money and, secondly, where is it to be located? What works in the desert, say solid precast concrete, will not work in canyons where there is flash flooding. In that terrain, a design utilizing steel bollards may work best.
Compared to existing fencing along the border, which ranges from 10 feet tall steel mat installed in the 1990s, to 16-foot-tall steel mesh erected in 2006, the new designs at 30 feet tall are imposing.
To be honest, it’s not even clear why all this testing is even necessary. We already have a good model of a huge border wall that works well: Israel’s walls.
And you know it was built for cheap, too, considering how stingy the Jews are.
Plus, it would be really funny to have all these Jews complaining about Trump’s wall when it’s exactly the same model as their own. Just showing the two pictures side by side would be enough to troll them.
But in reality, the secret to the success of Israel’s wall isn’t its architecture. It’s the fact that people know how cruelly the Jews treat infiltrators, how they’re put in dirty concentration camps.
Far more important than any wall, which only really serves a symbolic value, is to send a clear message that these people are not welcome here, and their lives in America will be as fugitives and outlaws.
You’re not welcome here, Jose.
Once America stops being the “land of opportunities” for third-world mud people, they won’t have any incentive to cross the border – legally or otherwise.