Though Western Europe’s leaders continue to maintain that nothing can be done about the millions of African invaders looting and plundering the continent, one country in the Middle East doesn’t seem to have much trouble deporting their own nogs when desired.
Do you know which country I’m talking about?
I’ll give you six million guesses.
A senior Ugandan minister acknowledged for the first time on Friday that his country was “positively considering” a request by Israel to accept African asylum seekers.
In a statement released ahead of a press conference in Kampala, State Minister for Relief, Disaster Preparedness and Refugees Musa Ecweru confirmed his country was in talks with Jerusalem to accept several hundred refugees deported from Israel.
“The State of Israel working with other refugees’ managing organizations has requested Uganda to allow about 500 Eritreans and Sudanese to relocate to Uganda. The government and ministry are positively considering the request,” he said.
Ecweru denied that Israel was paying Uganda to take the asylum seekers, saying that the only motivation was humanitarian.
“The people saying on social media that countries give us money whenever we accept refugees to come in is false,” he said. “In fact, we are the ones who spend on these refugees.”
You hear that, folks?
Israel isn’t handing a single shekel to Uganda to take these blacks off of their hands. Rather, Uganda is the one footing the bill!
This can only mean one thing: Uganda wants more black refugees. I mean, a poor African nation isn’t going to spend time and resources on something it doesn’t desire, right?
So why can’t Britain or Sweden deport their blacks to refugee-friendly countries like Uganda, too?
What’s holding them back?
About 1,700 asylum seekers were “willingly deported” to Uganda in the past three years, but the [Israeli] government wants future deportations to take place much faster, at the rate of around 600 per month, rather than 600 per year. For this to happen, it needs a country that will accept asylum seekers who were forcibly deported, a stance that is unpopular in the international community.
Despite claiming that blacks are vibrant pension-payers in Europe, these Jews don’t seem too keen on having blacks in their own nation.
In fact, they don’t seem to have much love for them at all.
Jews often whine that white Americans were still lynching blacks as late as 1981. But did you know that Jews were still lynching blacks as late as 2015?
This all seems a little hypocritical to me.
It’s almost like the Jews are trying to hoodwink white people into accepting their own demographic displacement while retaining racial homogeneity for themselves.
Though Adolf Hitler did Holocaust them back in the 1940s…
… so I guess the double standards can be overlooked.