UK: Father Banned from Seeing Children for 10 Years for Missing a Hearing He Wasn’t Told About

Sven Longshanks
Daily Stormer
December 19, 2014

kafka_crop
The Judge said Mr R, who cannot be identified, could have been forgiven for feeling like Josef K – the protagonist in Franz Kafka’s 1925 novel The Trial.

A father has been thrown out of his home with no warning and been banned from seeing his children for ten years, thanks to his easily-led wife and the twisted feminist legal system.

Mrs R took out a non-molestation order without his knowledge and he knew nothing about it until he came home from work one day and she told him he was banned from the street.

When he later called his scheming spouse to find out exactly what was going on, the police arrested him, threw him in the cells over night and convicted him of a crime for phoning her.

The whole sorry state of affairs was cooked up by Judaized lawyers behind his back, with the original hearing that stripped him of his home, family and rights, being held in secret and lasting less than five minutes.

Thankfully after five months of not being able to see his children he finally had his appeal heard and it was upheld.

24126A0000000578-2874882-Mr_Justice_Peter_Jackson_above_allowed_Mr_R_s_appeal_and_set_asi-m-13_1418665228500
The man, who can only be identified as Mr R, was handed an order preventing him from seeing his children or entering his street. Mr Justice Peter Jackson overturned the order at appeal.

Daily Mail:

Mr Justice Jackson said that following marriage problems, Mrs R had contacted solicitors in May, hoping to persuade Mr R to leave.

The lawyers applied for a court order, saying the wife was at risk of harm. They claimed Mr R had shoved her, thrown objects, and had pushed her to the floor 17 years ago.

The application added that the wife had previously been expected to ‘engage in distasteful sexual practices’ and that her husband had controlled the finances.

But Mr Justice Jackson said the only recent incident listed was a row over a credit card bill and that the order was ‘entirely unrealistic’.

It was five months before an appeal reached the High Court, which ruled the order should never have been made. It found 11 injustices by the courts that granted and maintained the order.

The father, who can now see his children, told the court in a letter he was ‘disillusioned with the justice system … which removes me from my home and family with a completely fabricated statement’.

A police report said Mrs R begged officers not to arrest Mr R over his phone call and that her solicitor had told her to contact them.

Once again, people: women should have rights, but they should not have rights to make decisions over men.  A society which allows that is one doomed to utter failure.