UK: Indian Man Convicted of Distributing (Real, Non-AI) Child Porn Can’t be Deported Because of His Family

Didn’t we have a story yesterday about a white guy who got sent to prison for 18 years for AI cartoon child porn?

This Indian was sentenced to 14 months for real CP images.

Do you see? People acted like I was defending child porn yesterday when I said it was bullshit to send a guy to prison for 18 years for cartoons, but it’s just so obvious that that was an attack on AI, not on child porn.

So many people are emotional faggots.

Why would cartoons be 10 times worse than the real thing? There’s no outrageous emotional explanation for that difference, so I guess these fags will just block it out of their mind and continue calling for decades-long prison sentences for obscene cartoons.

European Conservative:

An Indian man facing deportation from the UK after being jailed for distributing child sex abuse images delayed his removal by arguing it would infringe on his right to “private and family life” under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

The Daily Mail reports that the man, referred to as “HS” due to a lifetime anonymity order, was sentenced to 14 months in prison in 2021 for distributing child sex abuse images. Additionally, he is under a sexual harm prevention order and is required to register as a sex offender for ten years.

Following his release, the Home Office attempted to deport him in 2022, citing his criminal record. However, HS challenged the deportation on human rights grounds, arguing it would harm his children.

An immigration tribunal initially ruled in HS’s favour, with Judge Jetsun Lebasci deciding that deportation would be “unduly harsh” for his children. This decision was based heavily on an independent social worker’s report, which stated that separation would negatively impact HS’s children. However, the Home Office contested the ruling, leading to an appeal in the upper immigration and asylum tribunal.

Upper tribunal judges Melissa Canavan and Matthew Hoffman expressed significant concerns about the original decision, criticising the social worker’s report for failing to thoroughly consider HS’s offences.

The judges noted that HS had been restricted to only supervised contact with his children due to his criminal background. They highlighted “startling omissions” in the report, including inadequate consideration of the safeguarding risks posed by HS’s convictions.

Comparing this to yesterday’s story of 18 years for cartoons, there are two issues: cartoons are 10 times worse than the real thing and also Indians get light sentences because of their dark skin.

Further, brown people have an eternal right to remain in white countries, regardless of what their behavior is. This fact proves that the goal of brown immigration is not actually to “enrich” white countries, but rather to destroy them. If you were actually attempting to do “enrichment,” you wouldn’t let child porn dealers from India remain on the loose.

The obvious goal of this immigration agenda is to completely destroy the white race and abolish traditional Western Christian culture, once and for all. They already turned people into atheists, turned people against their own ancestors, then they opened up the floodgates.

We could have come back from atheism. That is just a goofy meme belief system which could not be sustained longterm. Anyone can see that the promoters of atheism are mentally ill.

There is no coming back from mass immigration, however. These people have to be removed and they have to be removed quickly, or the white race will cease to exist.

But the masses of whites are neutered poodles. Child pornographers from India are raising their families on welfare while young white men can’t buy homes, and British people will say “well, that seems fair – because of colonialism.”