Spartacus
Daily Stormer
January 14, 2018
“… his dick started squirting blood everywhere…”
This has been floating around for a while, and it didn’t seem very important to me – just some more goofiness from the Isle of Rapestan.
But then I started thinking about it, and this smells fishy… Or should I say fischy ?
Come April, all websites containing pornographic material must verify the age of every UK visitor before they’re granted access, news that surely will come as a blow to teenagers, and many adults.
The new law is the first of its kind and is meant to protect minors from being exposed to porn that can damage their development, but it has long been argued that the law has ominous portents with regards to privacy and surveillance.
It’s for the kiddies, you stupid goyim.
It’s always for the kiddies.
The porn law will apply to websites containing at least one third pornographic material. The method of verification has not yet been confirmed but porn users may have to submit their bank details in order to prove their age or it could even see them installing software on their devices or presenting in person somewhere to verify their identity.
They’re not even sure how they’re gonna do it, but they’re gonna do it, huh?
That sounds like efficient governing to me.
Privacy advocates worry that porn sites will be able to log and track users’ porn preferences, placing them at risk of exposure –or even blackmail– should those databases be penetrated by hackers.
That sounds like a good way for these almost entirely Jew-owned sites to get info on some nazis, but I don’t really think that’s the main goal here.
The law has also been criticized because many people think it won’t work, as there are so many websites in the world and not all will take part in the verification process.
Detractors say that under-18s could easily flout the law using VPN’s (Virtual Private Networks) to pretend they aren’t in the UK and there are also fears that the law will drive young people to find other, less reputable sites that could expose them to more damaging extreme pornographic material, or malware.
So this will not only not actually work, but will cause more problems…
And I think THAT is the goal.
Think about it!
We know kikes support sexual depravity of every kind, and we know that they specifically target children with it.
I really don’t think I’d be off the mark by much if I say that over 90% of all Jews would engage in or approve of any sexual act with (goyim) children.
I mean, these people have been sucking blood out of their own babies’ dicks for thousands of years, and there’s no evidence that any of them ever said “Oy vey, this is a little creepy fellas. Can’t we just eat a cracker or something?”
On the other hand, we know that Britain is the most Kiked country in the world, by a very wide margin, and that virtually 100% of all state institutions are Jew-controlled one way or another.
So why would Jews order their meat puppets in the British government/parliament to attack something that they’ve otherwise supported unconditionally everywhere?
I remember listening to one of William Luther Pierce’s broadcasts where he was talking about Canada burning “nazi” books, and that that was initially sold to the cuckservatives there as a way to “protect children from porn,” but that they put “extremist material” in the fine print of the book burning law, and then focused almost exclusively on it after the law passed.
I think this supposedly anti-porn measure in Britain is just the first step in doing away with internet anonymity completely, which is already being promoted by officials in multiple countries (like Sweden) and, of course, spearheaded by the Jew vermin themselves.
If I were a betting man, I’d bet that it will happen in Britain within the next 5-10 years, unless the Britcucks do something about it.
And when was the last time they did anything about anything?