Adrian Sol
Daily Stormer
September 7, 2017
You don’t let Moslems off on anything. Being a Moslem IS the crime.
Is anyone surprised or outraged by this? I certainly am not, I can tell you that.
Oh, women are getting raped in the streets by brown Jihadists and the police are letting them go with no punishment? Well, duh, of course. Arresting them would be racist, after all.
The Rotherham case showed that even when little girls are getting kidnapped and raped by the thousands by these filthy Paki invaders, the authorities not only turn a blind eye to it, but actively assist them in their crimes (for example, by arresting fathers who try to rescue their girls).
And of course, this is in the same country that will put White guys in jail over nonsense “date rape” charges if they failed to have the girl sign a consent form in triplicate.
Campaigners and politicians have expressed concern over the revelation that Hampshire Police handed more than 100 cautions for rape and other serious sexual offences in the past five years.
Well, I’m sure it was justifiable sexual emergencies, so…
Crimes including sex with children under the age of 18 and incest were met by the force with police cautions — formal warnings that serve as an alternative to prosecution in minor cases — according to an investigation by the Hampshire Chronicle.
Oh, yeah, let’s not waste time and tax-payer money prosecuting silly things like minor cases of child-rape. Let’s be reasonable about this.
Since 2014, Hampshire constabulary have cautioned four people for rape, and another six for serious sexual assaults including five counts which were carried out on children under the age of 16.
Another disclosure from the data, which was obtained via Freedom of Information requests, included that between 2011 and 2012 the police force handed out 18 cautions for sexual assaults.
Tory MP Mims Davies, said she was “surprised and concerned” by the statistics, and pledged to raise the issue with Hampshire’s chief police constable.
The Eastleigh MP told the Hampshire Chronicle “it does not seem right” for police to issue cautions in response to “such concerning crimes, where these offences have such a long term impact on the victims”.
Davies’ reaction to the data echoed that of charity Rape Crisis England, whose spokesman reported: “The use of cautions for sexual offences has been a cause for concern for some time.
“In the vast majority of cases where the offender is an adult, they seem wholly inappropriate, largely because they don’t in any way reflect the seriousness of the crime or the long-lasting and often devastating impacts that sexual violence has on lives.”
“This is concerning.”
“This punishment seems inappropriate.”
Are these people completely incapable of outrage?
Yes, yes, most concerning. Let’s discuss this matter in more depth at the next meeting, dear.
Their daughters are getting raped in the streets and the most they can say is that it’s “concerning” that the police is letting off the Moslem criminals with warnings.
It’s not “concerning.”
It’s treason.
If your house is being ravaged by termites, and the exterminator you hired brought food and medicine for the insects instead of killing them, you wouldn’t be “concerned” that his methods seem “inappropriate.” You’d just fire him and get someone else.
It’s time we, in the West, collectively “fired” the people we’re paying to protect us, as these people are clearly on the enemy’s side.