Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
May 24, 2015
Jack Sen, a former candidate for UKIP who was suspended after attacking the filthy Jew bitch Luciana Berger on Twitter over her Jew plan to loot the UK and send the shekels to Jew Base One, has defected to the BNP.
Sen recently gave a speech at the London Forum wherein he stated that he is a National Socialist.
This is the BNP press release on Sen’s defection:
The British National Party has welcomed the defection of former Ukip candidate Jack Sen. Jack Sen stood as the Ukip candidate for West Lancashire at the General Election. He won over six thousand votes (representing around 12.5%) beating the Lib Dems by a large margin. This was despite being publicly suspended one week before the General Election and having his campaign effectively sabotaged by the Ukip leadership. Ironically Jack Sen still polled more votes than the Deputy Leader of Ukip, Paul Nuttall, MEP, who stood in a neighbouring constituency.
Adam Walker, Chairman of the BNP, commented:
“A number of Ukip members have contacted us with a view to joining. Many now realise that Ukip is not the party for ordinary men and women who are concerned about the way their neighbourhoods and country are going. Increasingly they see that Ukip is the mouthpiece of a section of big business which is becoming more and more difficult to distinguish from the establishment parties. They are looking to the BNP because we are funded by and represent only the British people. Unlike the Ukip leadership we will never sell-out our core values to court the establishment media. Ukip have barred former BNP members from membership but in contrast we will welcome former Ukip members who have seen the light with open arms. We urge Ukip members to join us and help us in providing a real alternative for the British people.”
The resignation letter sent by Mr Sen to Mr Farage is reproduced below.
Dear Mr Farage
I would like to inform you that I am resigning my Ukip membership with immediate effect.
Recent events have opened my eyes to the fact that Ukip is not what its leadership is desperate to have us all believe.
The long-running series of expulsions and suspensions – of which mine is the latest – is further proof that Ukip are willing to sacrifice its principles in its desperate attempt to meet the criteria and become accepted as an Establishment fixture.
At the expense of members, donors, supporters alike, Ukip has been reduced to a nothing more than a Politically Correct pressure group tethered and muzzled by big business. Regrettably, the party now embodies everything that a great many us joined up to fight.
While every ex-Ukip member suspended or expelled by the party has their own story to tell, mine is certainly worth a mention. The fact that a single phone call from a scurrilous Labour MP can have a popular parliamentary candidate and ’rising star’ in Ukip suspended and removed from the electoral list a week before the elections, on the basis of unfounded ‘crimes against political correctness’ should set alarm bells ringing for every Ukip member and supporter.
Furthermore, the extent to which Ukip is prepared to sell out on principle and policy to the highest bidder was laid bare when I was ordered not to speak out against Fracking or GM produce because Ukip had done a U-turn on their policy and it is widely rumoured within UKIP that this was due to receiving large donations from companies involved with Fracking and GM crops. There are an increasing number of Ukip members that think that on its present course Ukip will end up as political whore which would sell out any principle and policy alike in the search for money.
Ukip’s recent disastrous elections strategy, squandering millions, and losing one of its two Parliamentary seats highlights the extent to which the Ukip leadership is not only self-delusional but electorally immature.
I remain resolute in my determination to provide the British people with a real, honest and genuine nationalist alternative to the rotten old Establishment political parties.
Having taken it upon myself to research the alternatives and held meetings with senior officials, I have accepted the office of North West Press Officer and become a fully paid up and proud member of the British National Party.
Sen contacted me to elaborate on his decision.
“Although I am still in good standing with the party, after weeks of contemplation, I have resigned from UKIP. UKIP threw me under the bus without so much as a hearing,” he said. “Party brass blocked me on Twitter, never responded to my emails and ruined my campaign without so much as a second thought.”
He continued: “No party that betrays its candidates should be trusted to run a country. To think they’d allow a Labour MP that chaired the mighty Labour Friends of Israel the ability to sack a little UKIP ppc because he criticised her for lobbying to send money to Israel at the expense of people in the town my mum grew up in, who’d spent his last pennies on his campaign without as much as a phone call is shocking. The contempt UKIP have for regular people like myself is disgraceful, and not something I can easily overlook. Let’s just say this naive soul grew up watching how dirty UKIP play.”
He went on to explain the ideological differences he has with UKIP, saying: “I love my country, believe in a strong national identity, will fight to preserve our culture and want a strong society, safety net for the poor, national healthcare, etc. UKIP on the other hand use genuine nationalist and populist sentiment to sell their big business agenda – some of which I sadly bought when I joined the party.”
He also elaborated on the ideas he presented in his London Forum speech, wherein he suggested that UKIP may be a form of controlled opposition: “In my opinion UKIP is an establishment safety valve, controlled opposition – a mechanism designed to give people that genuinely care about this country, who want to see Britain return to the great country it was, who recognise banking fraud, corporatism, mass immigration and indigenous displacement as the major issues impacting the country, a party they can ‘believe ‘ in. It’s all smoke and mirrors.”
He mentioned that UKIP tends to be overly sympathetic to large corporate business interests, saying: “UKIP and I had a falling out when I wanted to put my objection to fracking on my leaflet. They were appalled that I’d put the interest of my West Lancashire constituents ahead of their cronies in big business. If UKIP come to power they will bring nationwide fracking, deregulation of the laws that protect us from criminal bankers, genetically modified food and crops.
He even questioned the party’s devotion to an anti-immigration agenda: “Based on the fact that they refuse to support the implementation of a quota system, UKIP aren’t even against mass immigration.”
Sen went on to suggest that UKIP struck a deal with the BBC to take support away from the BNP: “Farage made a deal with the BBC – he even suggested that the BBC start covering UKIP as the ‘right wing’ alternative, in order to kill the BNP in the polls.”
He also explained how he came to join the BNP: “Quite a few members of the British National Party (BNP) reached out to me since the suspension, commending me for my decision to speak out. One of them offered to put me in touch with BNP party Chairman Adam Walker, who’d heard about how I had been treated by UKIP. Adam and I have spoken quite a bit over the past week. I was impressed with the manner in which he wants to take the BNP forward and was pleased to see that our ideals and vision of a better Britain lined up. It was nice to know authentic nationalism is not dead.”
He said that much of his duties within the BNP with deal with addressing the national media, something that he has already proved himself very good at doing.
Good News
This is good news. It is definitely going to get media attention, and it may well be that with UKIP having failed to do what they were supposed to do, popular support will once again begin swinging toward the BNP.
My view of UKIP is probably not quite as negative as Sen’s, but it is enlightening to see his perspective on the issue after having been on the inside.
Some people have complained about the fact that Jack Sen has a percentage of East Indian blood, and this is definitely a valid concern. It is clear that what he is doing is good for our agenda, and it is clear that his own agenda is pro-British and anti-Jew/immigrant.
I would point out that he isn’t asking to marry anyone’s daughter.
So the question would be, what threat does Sen being involved in British nationalism pose, exactly? That is, what is the worst thing that could happen?
The threat I see is that allowing people who are not pure-blooded be involved in European nationalist politics could lead to a slippery slope, wherein we slide toward a concept of civic, rather than ethnic nationalism. This is a very valid concern.
The thing with Sen is that he recognizes nationalism as an ethnic concept, and is not pushing for changes in those values, he merely wants to help preserve the society he was born into, even while understanding that he is not a pure member of that society and being very upfront about it. As such, I personally view him as an asset much more than a threat, especially when we consider how bad things are and realize how devoted Sen is to the core principles of our movement.
So, I don’t know the answer. I do fully understand people’s concerns, and fully agree this is an area wherein we need to tread lightly.
What I do know is that the media spectacle surrounding this whole situation has been very beneficial to our cause, and that by creating this spectacle, Sen has already proven himself an asset. I mean, a mainstream figure coming out as a full-Nazi – this is a hard thing not to appreciate.
