Unisex Clothes for a Brave New World

Adrian Sol
Daily Stormer
September 4, 2017

Progressives are now embracing the 1984 aesthetic.

One thing that struck me when reading 1984 was the mention that everyone was wearing unisex, drab jumpsuits, and that all gender roles were abolished. The point, of course, was to destroy all basic human bonds, to be replaced with an artificial loyalty to an abstract “party.”

While adherents to the modern Jew-liberal system like to present themselves as colorful eccentrics who value “humanity” over drab, boring traditions, in reality they are the very embodiment of that totalitarian drive to abolish nature. They claim that their “omnisexual” perversions are all about “love,” but in fact they’re responsible for destroying all love from society.

We’re in a completely materialistic, completely individualistic world, where natural relationships between men and women are quickly being pathologized into nonexistence, replaced by hordes of joyless, sexless hedonists.

From a physical prison, to a spiritual one.

Get ready for your blue jumpsuits, boys and girls.

They’re right around the corner.

The Guardian:

Is John Lewis at the frontline of modern gender politics? It has never seemed so before, but judging by the reaction to the department store’s announcement last week that its own-brand children’s clothes will no longer be divided by gender, some people clearly see the retailer as radical. There will now be no separate sections in the stores, nor such binary labels on the clothes themselves; instead, the labels will read “girls and boys” or “boys and girls”.

The conversation over whether clothing should be more gender-neutral does not just apply to childrenswear – over the past decade there has also been a marked rise in gender-neutral clothing for adults. Some high-end designers such as JW Anderson, Rick Owens and Rad Hourani have championed gender-neutral clothing, while a raft of smaller companies run by young designers, such as Rich Mnisi, are pushing the idea that men’s and women’s clothes should be obsolete categories. This approach has also filtered down to the high street – H&M and Zara have both created non-gendered ranges.

Actually, it seems we’re already halfway there to the blue jumpsuits.

The British designer Katharine Hamnett has a long history of exploring non-gender-specific clothing, and her newly reissued collection features unisex shirts, sweatshirts and silk all-in-one suits. She says that, in the past, when women stepped on to more traditionally male sartorial territory – wearing military-inspired clothing, for instance – this “was about appropriating male power”. Now, she says, a move towards equality means women “may be feeling more comfortable with themselves”; in other words, they may have the freedom to wear what they like. (It is still far less common for men to seek out traditionally female clothing.)

You think women have been wearing dresses for thousands of years because they were oppressed? Women wear distinctive clothing, hairstyles and accessories in order to attract men. The point of this “unisex” nonsense is to put an end to that, in order to reduce man-woman relationships to tedious, business-like drivel. The point is to wipe us out.

The Jews have engineered the perfect mix of 1984 and Brave New World in order to engineer the destruction of the White race and the enslavement of humanity. A sexless, childless totalitarian society drenched in pleasure and perversion, with everyone too doped up on mind-numbing drugs to realize what’s going on or do something about it.

We’re the only force which represents the natural order, including the fact that men and women are different and that sexual reproduction is actually an important part of civilization and racial survival.

That’s why we’re enemy number one of the Jews and their evil servants.