Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
January 18, 2019
With Paul Ryan out, Kevin McCarthy is now the top Republican in the House.
His first action in that role has been to create a public spectacle at the behest of the Jews by attacking a popular Congressman for ostensibly defending “white supremacy.”
What is even more concerning than this dastardly act itself is the Jewish response, which has been one of aggressive praise.
When Rep. Steve King was ushered into House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy’s office Monday night, after sparking outrage for questioning whether the term “white supremacist” is offensive, he expected to be scolded. He did not expect his career in congressional politics to effectively end.
But as the Iowa Republican sat on a couch beneath an eight-foot-tall portrait of Abraham Lincoln, it quickly became clear that McCarthy — whom King has long privately knocked as soft — was taking a hard line.
King, an ally of President Trump’s and a regular guest on conservative media programs, offered to “go quiet,” according to three people familiar with the exchange who were not authorized to speak publicly.
McCarthy dismissed the suggestion — and the nine-term Republican was soon stripped of all his committee assignments.
Just so you understand, King’s position is that he said “white nationalism, white supremacy, Western civilization” and then asked why the latter was considered offensive, not the other two.
There is no video of the recording, so it is King’s word against the New York Times’ as to what sort of intonation he punctuated this one sentence with in order to indicate his meaning.
One has to wonder what this meeting looked like, with Steve King saying “that’s not what I meant, they’re misrepresenting me” and McCarthy replying “it doesn’t matter.”
For McCarthy, 53, the hour-long confrontation with King was a critical moment early in his tenure as the new leader of Republicans in the House, testing whether the easygoing Californian was willing to take on a popular conservative and assert himself in the wake of sweeping GOP defeats in the 2018 elections and the high-profile speakership of Rep. Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.).
It was also a reminder of how Republican leaders have done little to police their ranks on the charged issue of race in recent years, from their embrace of Trump despite him casting doubt on President Barack Obama’s U.S. citizenship to their support of the divisive King — making his punishment an outlier rather than the standard.
McCarthy’s diminishment of King came after years of inaction by House Republican leaders, including McCarthy, who served as majority leader from 2014 until earlier this year and was majority whip for more than three years before that. During that time King made repeated statements disparaging immigrants and minorities, as did other members, but leaders chose not to move against them — fearful that taking harsh action would antagonize the party’s conservative base.
McCarthy referenced that history in an interview with a local radio station this week. “Past leaders did not act,” he said. “I just felt, I don’t care if it hurts me or not — I’ve got to just do the right thing.”
As a member of the party’s “conservative base,” I can tell you without question that this is antagonizing us.
This moral judgement that it is “the right thing” is antagonizing me the most. If McCarthy came out and said “we have to appease the media,” I would feel much less antagonized.
The reality is that King is wildly popular.
We are supposed to have a “democracy,” which means – or used to mean – that the will of the people is represented in the government. If this were actually how the system worked, then it wouldn’t be the job of the GOP to go around trying to be the schoolmaster of elected officials.
This demand that Republicans bow before the throne of the Jews and take a stand against the white race is coming exclusively from the media.
It could also be coming from Jewish donors, but we don’t have any record of that. All we can see is the Jewish media declaring this new moral paradigm to be unquestionable, and Republicans like McCarthy rushing eagerly to conform.
Many Democrats inside and outside the Capitol expressed skepticism about McCarthy’s change of heart and argued that his effort to now distance the GOP from King did little to erase its past support for him.
Former Obama White House adviser Dan Pfeiffer mocked McCarthy on Twitter for “wrestling so deeply with Steve King’s long record of racism” yet still giving thousands to his reelection campaign.
According to the Center for Responsive Politics, King received more than $27,000 last year from political committees affiliated with GOP leaders, including $5,000 from McCarthy’s group.
Yes, this is obviously absurd.
Even if King did ask how “white supremacy” became an offensive term, that would be a lesser offensive to Jewish post-morality than statements he made in 2015 about how minorities never invented anything.
When King was younger, “white supremacy” was not an offensive term.
Just as an example, in 1971, when King was 22 years old, the famous movie star John Wayne endorsed white supremacy in an interview with Playboy.
No one freaked out about it at that time. I haven’t even found any record that it was even remotely controversial.
So the question “when did ‘white supremacy’ become an offensive term?” is an interesting historical question in its own right.
Is there a specific date? Did someone make an announcement? How did this happen?
House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md.) was more measured when asked about McCarthy, saying, “It’s never too late to do the right thing.”
…
McCarthy’s relationship with Trump hovers as another variable. While he has drawn attention for carefully cultivating his presidential bond, to the point of bringing the president a jar of his favorite Starburst candy, the deluge of investigations Trump faces could cause unease among members of his caucus and force McCarthy to choose between protecting the president or them.
…
Republicans lost 40 seats last year, their worst showing in the House since 1974, and McCarthy’s own California delegation was roughly halved by Democratic gains as suburban voters fled from the party. Not acting against King, to some members, would have been political malpractice.
Yes.
Apparently, the belief is that the Republicans lost the House in November because they don’t crack down hard enough on racism.
That is the worst conceivable view that they could take on what is going on right now. Just horrible.
In actual reality, Trump is the popular figure in the party, probably the only truly popular figure on the national stage, and he is a boomer-type “racist” who has said a lot worse things than Steve King.
Just the other day, he made a joke about an Indian massacre. He does this stuff all the time. No one cares.
Meanwhile, the “not who we are” cuckold Paul Ryan was forced to resign.
The overwhelming majority of Republicans support the wall, and this support is rising, not falling.
There is no indicator showing that Republicans want less racism.
There are many indicators that white people feel more and more that they are under attack as a group, and that they would in fact be more open to the more open displays of racial solidarity that were looked down upon during the Bush years.
Of course, you can’t poll them on that – they will all rush to say how not racist they are. But you can gather a view of it by looking at the situation logically.
“These situations arise, and you take the action you take for the right reasons, but you also have to understand the political implications of making a bad decision, and he’s got a clear mind on this,” said Rep. Greg Walden (R-Ore.), a former GOP campaign chairman. “He was direct, took the action and is willing to take the heat and is moving us, I think, in the right direction.”
…
King, meanwhile, has been lashing out, saying on a St. Louis radio show this week that the experience has been “perverse” and like a “bad dream.”
McCarthy “decided he’s going to believe the New York Times over Steve King, and that’s a fact,” King said, adding that Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.), a McCarthy ally and chair of the GOP conference, lacked “the moral authority or the intellectual judgment” to call for his resignation.
…
McCarthy, in the local radio interview this week, alluded to the raw political calculus he considered. He made his decision, he said, knowing that he wanted to differentiate himself from Pelosi as the political war of divided government begins.
“I hope it also shows how we deal with our problems, and Speaker Pelosi on her side,” McCarthy said. “. . . She’s got a new member that wants to impeach and cuss [the president]. And she’s done nothing.”
McCarthy was referring to Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), who handed Democrats their first controversy of the new term this month when she told a room of liberal activists that Congress would “impeach the motherf—–,” a reference to Trump.
Pelosi told NBC News soon after: “I probably have a generational reaction to it. I’m not in the censorship business. I don’t like that language, I wouldn’t use that language, but I wouldn’t establish language standards for my colleagues.”
So see, there you go.
You have proven nothing at all, McCarthy, other than how weak you are.
You have not proven that you are better than the Democrats because you attack your own people when they say things that are ostensibly offensive to the other side.
“Losing with honor” is never excusable, but it becomes even more inexcusable when there isn’t even any honor involved, and you are just losing on purpose.
There are other GOP grumbles about how McCarthy handled King, almost entirely on the conference’s right flank, which has long been suspicious of McCarthy, as well as Ryan and Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) before him.
“If the reporter did a crummy job and did not have a tape recording of the conversation, given the New York Times’ willingness to lie, I would give the benefit of the doubt to Steve King when he says what his intent was and the words he actually uttered,” said Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.).
Some members, speaking privately, are also dismayed by McCarthy’s oversight of committee assignments and argue that conservatives are being passed over for desirable posts — and speculate that the King episode is part of a broader pattern of McCarthy consolidating power.
That theory makes a lot more sense than that he’s doing it to honor the memory of Abraham Lincoln, I’ll tell you what.
Abraham Lincoln said flat out while running for office that he didn’t want to free the slaves. Then after he freed the slaves, he promised to deport them all to Africa because they were subhuman.
I am not a Lincoln supporter and I think it was terrible the way he killed all those toothless hillbillies. But this idea that he was some kind of anti-racist figure is just fucking stupid. It is factually inaccurate.
Brooks said he hoped McCarthy would become more aggressive with Democrats in the coming months and bolster the party’s message with “very strong language that catches the eye of the American people.”
“We’ve got to start penetrating the media fog,” Brooks said.
McCarthy is busy getting penetrated by media Jews.
McCarthy’s decision to remove King from his perches on the House Agriculture, Judiciary and Small Business committees was made in coordination with the powerful Republican Steering Committee, which formally decides assignments along with the House leadership.
Inside that meeting, a couple of members asked McCarthy whether King had been misquoted. McCarthy said no and made the case for removal by going over not only King’s comments to the Times but his past statements, according to two Republican lawmakers present.
“Everybody was on the same page, that in a case like this we as a party need to be very clear that doesn’t represent us. Because there’s a real danger if you don’t,” said one of the lawmakers present.
Steve King is not trying to represent you.
He is trying to represent the people of his district in Iowa, which is what he was elected to do.
All of these people could have simply told the Jewish media when it came knocking “yeah well, I don’t agree with that, but it’s not any of my business.”
They also could have said that they side with King over the NYT, which lies all the time. The fact that he is being ousted simply on the word of the Times makes this all the more disgusting and sick.
After years of accommodating King in the House and being Ryan’s understudy, McCarthy felt he had to “wake up and lead,” as one ally said of his thinking.
Before meeting King, McCarthy told his aides that he looked up King’s past statements on YouTube. He spoke to Sen. Tim Scott (R-S.C.), a McCarthy friend who is the lone black Republican senator. Eventually, he concluded that anything but throwing King off his committees would be a mistake, for him and the GOP, according to the three people familiar with the meeting.
During the session, King asked McCarthy, “Why don’t you just reprimand me?” He then asked for a “pause” in the decision-making process, the people said.
But his fate had already been decided.
So that’s where we’re at with the new #1 Republican in the House.
It’s extremely discouraging.
Not just because racism and so on, but because this guy is just a loser. He is going to lose and lose and lose. You can see that clearly from this event, outside of any issues of racial sentiment.
But hey – at least the Jewish media won’t call him a racist, personally.
They can put that on his tombstone: “The Jewish Media Never Called Me a Racist.”
