War-Loving Fox News Defense Secretary Hopeful Says Women Shouldn’t be in the Military (He is a Faggot)

Women are the ones who vote for these wars and support them. The entire Ukraine war was a gigantic vagina operation from top to bottom.

They should have to go fight these wars. The fact that you have people who can vote and then not be forced to deal with the consequences of that vote is completely insane on its face.

We are going to need a big draft to do Zionism, maybe to do Ukrainian transsexual neo-Nazism and Taiwan gay pride marches, and these sluts need to be on the frontlines getting their tops popped off.

Pete Hegseth is a faggot.

AP:

President-elect Donald Trump’s nominee for defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, has reignited a debate that many thought had been long settled: Should women be allowed to serve their country by fighting on the front lines?

The former Fox News commentator has made it clear, in his own book and in interviews, that he believes men and women should not serve together in combat units. If Hegseth is confirmed by the Senate, he could try to end the Pentagon’s nearly decade-old practice of making all combat jobs open to women.

Pete Hegseth

I’m straight up just saying we should not have women in combat roles. It hasn’t made us more effective. Hasn’t made us more lethal. Has made fighting more complicated,” he said in a podcast hosted by Shawn Ryan on Nov. 7. Women have a place in the military, he said, just not in special operations, artillery, infantry and armor units.

Hegseth’s remarks generated a barrage of praise and condemnation. And they raised a question:

“Who’s going to replace them? Men? And we’re having trouble recruiting men into the Army right now,” said Lory Manning, a retired Navy captain who works with the Service Women’s Action Network.

The military services have struggled for years to meet recruiting goals, facing stiff competition from companies that pay more and offer similar or better benefits. And a growing population of young people aren’t interested in joining or can’t meet the physical, academic and moral requirements.

Removing women from contention for jobs, said Manning, could force the services to lower standards to bring in more men who have not graduated high school, have criminal records or score too low on physical and mental tests.

Hegseth has said he is not suggesting women should not be combat pilots, but that they should not be in jobs such as SEALs, Army Rangers, infantry, armor and artillery where “strength is a differentiator.” He insists the military lowered standards to get more women into combat roles. The services have said they did not decrease the standards for any of the combat jobs.

Hegseth’s view on women in combat reflects much of the debate over the past nine years, in the wake of then-Defense Secretary Ash Carter’s order in late 2015 that the military open all military jobs to women. That change followed three years of study and wrangling and was a formal recognition that thousands of women had served — and many were wounded or killed — on battlefields in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Obviously, women are not good at the military. Women are not good at anything, in fact. They are weak and stupid.

Related: New Zealand Defends Lesbian Captain After Country Loses First Warship Since WWII

But how can you allow them to vote, allow them to have power in society, if they’re not required to sign up for the draft?

Furthermore, it doesn’t matter if they can’t fight. Just send them on suicide missions where they start crying while brutal Russian psychopaths gun them down.

If you’re going to defend women not having to serve in the military, you have to also call for stripping them of all of their power in society. There is simply nothing else that makes any sense. Military services (or the willingness to engage in it in case it’s needed), from the time of prehistoric tribes, has been a prerequisite for participating in public society.