Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
October 8, 2015
The Washington Post, objectively the most ridiculously and unapologetically pro-establishment major publication in the United States, has come out and admitted that Obama is getting destroyed by Putin on the geopolitical level and is going to lose Syria completely.
There is no slant left to put on it. The administration’s position, which mixes “hehehehehe, oh he’ll see, Putin will see when he loses, hehehehe” and “OMG VIOLATION OF THE TURKEY AIRSPACE WAHHHHH” is so idiotic that not even the Post can back it up.
They, of course, reinforce the cartoonish narrative as much as possible, but have to admit that Obama (the Jews behind him, in real talk) has just lost “The New Cold War” he started when he allowed the State Department and George Soros to pay a bunch of mercenaries posing as Nazis to violently overthrow the government of the Ukraine.
Russia’s military moves in Syria are fundamentally changing the face of the country’s civil war, putting President Bashar al-Assad back on his feet, and may complicate the Obama administration’s plans to expand its air operations against the Islamic State.
So far, the administration has not budged in its twofold strategy — direct airstrikes against the Islamic State and significant aid for those fighting against it, and a push for negotiations to end what has been the largely separate Syrian civil war.
None of that is actually true, except the part about “complicating” the administration’s plans.
Firstly, it is not a “civil war,” it is a mercenary army combined with actual religious terrorists invading and attempting to overthrow a leader of a country.
Secondly, the Jews don’t actually believe that “democracy will take hold” in any Middle Eastern country, and they surely do not believe that “moderate” terrorists are going to build such a democracy after they overthrow the popular government.
Nor do the negotiations even have anything to do with the fighting on the ground. None of the terrorist groups in Syria – including the ones admittedly directly funded by the CIA – support the claim of the Syrian National Council that it is the government in exile; the organization has literally no connection whatsoever to anything happening in Syria.
The administration’s strategy does have two folds, but they are to attempt to murder Bashir al-Assad like he did Gaddaffi and to create ongoing chaos in the entire region.
Senior administration officials acknowledge that Russia has already made some tactical gains in the civil war, even as they insist President Vladimir Putin will ultimately pay for what they describe as a strategic blunder that will undercut his already tenuous reputation in the world and encourage the spread of the militants.
If Putin’s goal was “to get attention,” one senior official said, “then it was brilliant. . . . If it was to end the fighting in Syria, that’s where we think it’s a strategic error.” At the same time, the official said, “Russia is now going to be viewed as being anti-Sunni . . . attracting the ire of extremist groups,” including the Islamic State.
But others within the administration, and many outside experts, are increasingly worried that if President Obama does not take decisive action — such as quickly moving to claim the airspace over northwestern Syria and the Turkish border, where Russian jets are already operating — it is the United States that will suffer significant damage to both its reputation and its foreign policy and counterterrorism goals.
That is the issue.
The current internal administration debate is largely the same one that has kept the administration out of significant intervention in Syria’s civil war for the past four years. On one side, Russia’s involvement has strengthened the winning argument that the United States should avoid direct involvement in yet another Middle East conflict and should continue directing its resources toward countering forces such as the Islamic State that pose a direct threat to U.S. national security.
On the other side, the argument is that it makes no strategic sense for the United States to concede Russian dominance of the situation: If Russia succeeds in keeping Assad in power, the problems in the West caused by both the Syrian war and militant expansion will only get worse.
That is completely nonsensical. The only options in the Middle East are
a) Strictly-enforced Islamic law run by a council of religious gurus,
b) A popular dictatorship that appeals to Arab conceptions of authoritarianism while also allowing certain liberal elements, enabling a social progression from the stone age, and
c) Total chaos, a bunch of 15-35 year old monkeys running around in the desert chopping each others heads off, raping all the women and blowing things up for no clear reason beyond primitive testosterone-indulgence.
No intelligent people debate this, unless they are lying.
The idea that helping a popular dictator is going to do something negative for the West is gibberish. The refugee crisis was caused by Western-Jew interventionism.
There has never been an “Arab democracy” of any kind, and the West’s ostensible attempts at creating one, always based on vague moralizing, have had a 100% success rate at creating complete monkey chaos.
Both the real Sharia states in the Gulf and the Jews support total chaos over popular dictatorship. Their reasons for doing so are self-explanatory: popular semi-progressive dictatorship is a threat to the existence of both.
The administration has said that the civil war can be solved only through negotiations and that there can be no solution that leaves Assad in power.
…
“The only viable future for a unified Syria is one that unites the moderate elements and what remains of the regime after Assad is pushed out,” a U.S. intelligence official said Wednesday. But “Russia’s actions have directly threatened that prospect.”
The only “moderate element” in Syria is Assad. No one even argues this. The Syrian National Council is in Turkey and admittedly has no real connection to any group in Syria.
But they just keep saying “Assad can’t possibly remain” without ever explaining why.
What’s more, they can’t explain what they even plan to replace it with. When responding to the West’s crocodile tears about supporting Assad, Russia asked for a name of who they want to replace him with, and the West failed to answer.
Recent efforts by the United Nations and others to organize new negotiations, beginning with localized cease-fires, have already begun to fall apart under Russian bombardment that is likely to change Assad’s calculus. Some see the Kremlin’s goal as maintaining Assad’s control over a rump Syrian state, in western population centers away from areas of Islamic State dominion, an objective that would also ensure Russia’s continued foothold in the Middle East.
There you go. You said something factual!
“If [the possibility of negotiations] existed until one or two weeks ago, we definitely find ourselves today . . . in a completely different place,” said one international official who has long been involved in the effort. “We’ve been completely blown out of the water.”
BTFO!
A cease-fire reached with Iran and Hezbollah to allow aid and evacuation of civilians from Zabadani, west of Damascus near the Lebanese border, has now unraveled “because of Russian action,” the international official said. Although coordinates had been shared with Russia and plans were in place for U.N. officials to enter the area Saturday, it has been bombed three times, said the official, who like other U.S. and international officials spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations.
“Evacuation of civilians” is a codeword for “migration to Germany,” by the way.
Russia has said that its purpose is to strike the Islamic State. But the vast majority of its targets have been in areas of opposition control in western Syria and are seen as paving the way for Assad’s forces to take territory lost to the rebels or never contested.
…
Assad’s military, also backed by Russian and Iranian supplies and intelligence, and new influxes of Iranian and Hezbollah fighters, appear to stand a good chance of regaining the initiative against the Syrian rebels, many of whom say they fear they are being abandoned by the United States.
An alternative nightmare scenario has already begun to play out, as CIA-armed rebels have begun fighting against Syrian troops moving into Russian-bombed areas, part of the U.S.-Russia “proxy war” that Obama has vowed to avoid.
You’d best start believing in CIA proxy-wars with Russia.
You’re in one.
As rebel forces reposition themselves farther south in Idlib and Hama provinces, the Islamic State is likely to gain a stronger foothold in the northwest region along the Turkish border to the north of Aleppo, Syria’s second-largest city.
That region has been under discussion between the United States and Turkey as a possible protected area where rebels can regroup and refugees can gather.
…
But Russian operations in the area may complicate those plans and push the administration toward a decision to confront Moscow — one that it has so far not wanted to make. Turkey, and NATO, have already warned Russia after at least two incursions of Turkish airspace.
“They are sending planes and messages to Turkey and NATO,” said Sutyagin, once a military policy expert for the Russian government. The message, he said, is that “this area, where you want to establish safe zones . . . is not safe because we are approaching there, entering your airspace, and there might be clashes.”
The whole situation is hilarious.
Watching the Obama Adminstration try to explain themselves, then watching the Washington Post try to explain for them, and none of it making any sense.
It is definitely a time for celebration.
Finally, something wonderful is happening.
