Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
September 19, 2016
Just ran across a weird YouTube channel. White British guy married to a Black woman, they’re carrying a baby around the world.
I’m not really triggered by miscegenation if the mixer is a male, because it doesn’t really make any difference, biologically. With a woman, there is a lot of anger, because it’s OUR WOMB – that’s right, it doesn’t belong to her, it belongs to the males in her society – that is being used to produce an enemy soldier. Our race isn’t going to run out of sperm any time soon, so when it’s a man doing it, it’s just sort of like “lolwut?”
I mean, it’s that way with a Black woman. When you see White men with Asian women it’s just like “oh he’s beta” or “oh he just can’t take it anymore.”
But a Black woman?
What is this?
Is it just some kind of weird fetish?
Or is it like, he’s so cucked that he feels like he’s gotta signal super-hard to show how much better he is than his peers by creating and raising a monkey child? Is it to seem more interesting? Maybe he’s playing the long game, so that like, in the future when his son is committing robbery and rape, he can be like “oh my god, it’s because of racism” and people will feel sorry for him?
He’s not bad looking. And he’s got money to fly around the world for this YouTube channel.
So what’s the deal?
I guess it’s so rare that it is just some sort of weird thing that is going to happen based on the number of people there are.
There’s a movie coming out soon about the legalization of mixed-race marriages in Virginia. The case that the Jew ACLU lawyer used to get it passed was a WMBF relationship. Jews are clever like that. There is virtually no chance that a BMWF marriage ever would have made it through. But since it was a White guy with a Black woman, no one was really that angry, they were just like “huh?”
Men who produce children with non-Whites should absolutely be mocked and ostracized. And it shouldn’t be legal. Although when we take over the system, it won’t even be possible, unless these guys want to fly to Africa to do it, because they’re all going back. But it doesn’t trigger the same visceral reaction when you see it, because in terms of the survival of the race, it doesn’t make any difference if some men go have kids with non-Whites. It is, however, gross and weird.
But yeah, when you see women with non-Whites, it’s a biological response that you’re having. It’s the same response that creates white knighting, and this whole idea of “women and children first.” Women’s eggs are infinitely more valuable than men’s sperm. So there is an inborn drive in men to constantly protect women. And when you see them with non-Whites, you immediately respond negatively.
A recent study – which I’ve been meaning to write about for several days now – found that people have an instinctual trigged reaction to interracial couples. Interestingly, all the examples they give are non-White male with White female. It would be interesting to see the difference between the tests if they included the gender of the couples (I’d also be interested in the differences in the responses of the males vs those of the females involved in the tests).
The article is entitled ” Most say they’re okay with interracial marriage, but could the brain tell a different story?” It’s a TOP KEK when the liberals admit this stuff is biological and then imply we have to somehow change biology with brainwashing.
Next year marks the 50th anniversary of the Supreme Court decision ruling bans on interracial marriage unconstitutional.
While the ruling in Loving v. Virginia (1967) was controversial at the time – in 1958 just 4 percent of Americans approved of marriages “between white and colored people” – today polls indicate that most Americans (87 percent) accept interracial marriage.
Yet incidents of overt prejudice – even violence – against interracial couples keep cropping up. In April, a Mississippi landlord evicted a family after he found out the couple was interracial. Then, this past summer, a man stabbed an interracial couple after seeing them kiss in public.
Both incidents were BMWF.
As a social psychologist, I’ve often wondered: are these types of incidents aberrations? Or are they indicative of a persistent, underlying bias against interracial couples – something not captured by self-reported polls?
To test this, my colleague Caitlin Hudac and I designed a series of studies to examine how people really feel about interracial relationships.
Insights from the insula
Through the early 20th century, many Americans reacted to the idea of interracial marriage with revulsion. For example, Abigail Adams reportedly said that “disgust and horror” filled her mind when she saw dark-skinned Othello touch pale-skinned Desdemona in the theatrical production of Othello.
Yet even though attitudes have supposedly changed, contemporary commentary on interracial marriage will still refer to a “gag reflex” that some people continue to feel – as The Washington Post’s Richard Cohen noted a few years ago.
This feeling – disgust – is the one we decided to zero in on.
First we asked a predominately white sample of college students to report how disgusted they feel by interracial relationships between blacks and whites. We also had the participants tell us how accepting they were of interracial relationships between blacks and whites.
Consistent with polling data, we found that participants claimed to be largely accepting of interracial relationships. We also found that disgust and acceptance were highly correlated; the less accepting people were of interracial relationships, the more disgusted they were by them.
The problem with asking people to report on their own attitudes about sensitive topics like race and gender, however, is that people are often either unaware of their own biases or unwilling to report them. For example, although most white Americans self-report little to no racial bias against black people, they’ve been shown to possess robust implicit, or nonconscious, biases.
That link is to another study that proves racism is biological.
To get around this problem, we conducted a second study in which we measured participants’ brain activity – not their own reports. Using an electroencephalogram (EEG), which measures electrical activity in the brain, we recorded the brain waves of a predominately white sample of college students while they viewed 100 images of black-white interracial couples and an equal number of same-race couples (black and white).
We wanted to see what would happen in an area of the brain known as the insula, which has been shown to become activated when people feel disgust. In other words, would the insula of participants light up when viewing interracial couples?
We found exactly that: overall, participants showed a heightened level of activation in the insula when looking at interracial couples relative to looking at same-race couples.
Although the insula is not exclusively linked to disgust, taken with the results of our first study these findings suggest that people do tend to be more likely to experience disgust when viewing interracial couples.
So basically, everything that you think and feel is a result of your biology. It’s a strange feeling to be consciously aware of that. Totally meta, brah. But it will help you in your life if you are consciously aware of it, keep you in control of yourself.
