What Really is the Point of the English Defence League?

Diversity Macht Frei
September 17, 2017

The English Defence League has issued a statement about the recent Parsons Green attack.

Let’s skip their narration of events and the by-now weary platitudes from the Counterjewhad movement and go straight to their recommendations for action.

The only way to prevent Islamic terrorism is to defuse Muslims in Britain as individuals and as communities, congregations, organisations, classes and representative bodies. Islam has demonstrated that it, too, needs to be defused for the safety and security of the rest of the population.

We are not calling for deportation, banning, incarceration or any other impracticable knee-jerk reaction. Just defusing.

Do we really want to live the rest of our lives being a few steps too many behind the Islamists and their sorry English victims? Far preferable to deploying crack police snipers, brave MI5 informers and threat levels hovering back and forth between “severe” and “critical” would be for British Muslims to never even think about imposing sharia on their aspirational British caliphate.

Preventing attacks will be difficult. But so will living with a murderous mass jihad attack every couple of months or so. Surely aiming for prevention is “proportionate and sensible”. And surely it is within the capabilities of our society to deal with and prevent this recurring deadly terrorist activity. Who believes we cannot do so?

Can we, please, make Parsons Green the turning point from denial and incomprehension to a truly proportionate and responsible response?

So the solution to Mohammedan terror is to “defuse” Muslims and “defuse” Islam. OK, and how do we do that? No instructions are given. Presumably we should just send them on a citizenship course to teach them correct “British values”? This is the kind of nonsense politicians have been coming out with for ages. It’s no solution to anything.

Everywhere on earth where Muslims contact into contact with non-Muslims, they engage in systematic violence against them. It is irrelevant whether these Muslims who engage in this violence are a majority or minority of the populations they came from. The pattern exists and it is universal.

If you have Muslims, you’re going to have jihad. The more Muslims you have, the more jihad you’re going to have.

There are therefore only two solutions that will significantly reduce the incidence of jihad violence in Britain’s future:

1. Reduce Muslim immigration to the country.
2. Facilitate or force Muslim emigration from the country.

These, incidentally, are not marginal or extreme positions. A majority of Europeans and 47% of British people support a ban on any further immigration from Muslim-majority countries. (link)

The EDL, however, despite being one of the most visible Islam Resistance forces in the country, doesn’t have even the moral fortitude to call for a policy change support by half of the population.

Why not? From a certain perspective, you can understand the reservations members of the ruling class have about discussing these issues candidly. They know that honest talk would result in career termination. It’s a cowardly choice but an understandable one. Being brave would have important practical consequences for them. But what do the EDL have to lose?

They are already reviled by the powers-that-be; smeared as evil, “racist” and “Nazis”. The government bans their marches. Nor are they invited to air their points of view on debates on public media. And despite their ostentatious waving of Israeli flags, Jewish organisations brand them hate groups and call for them to be shunned.

They have absolutely nothing to lose yet are still paralysed by the elite moral standards that have been inculcated into them. We complain about the political correctness of politicians. But how can we expect politicians to do anything about the Muslim problem if even despised dissident groups are too intimidated to say what it is we want them to do?

The EDL at this point is a complete and utter joke. The fact that they still have a Paypal Donate button on their web page says it all.  Any genuine political dissident know that the first rule of political guerrilla warfare is: once you’re a threat to the existing order of things, your Paypal button gets removed.

The EDL shows us the tragic limits of kosher dissent. You cannot challenge the existing order of things while staying within the moral boundaries the system has defined – because those boundaries have been defined specifically to make meaningful change impossible. Only when you are willing to don the mantle of heretic, and endure the vilification that inevitably goes along with it, can you be an agent of any change that matters.

Let’s be generous and say only 1% of Muslims shared these inclinations. The size of the Islamic state army in Syria is estimated at around 30,000. 30,000 is 1% of 3 million. So if you have 3 million Muslims in your country, you are at risk of Islamic-State like barbarity if order breaks down.

It’s clear that the principal risk factor for Muslim violence