Why Can’t We Have a Two-State Solution?

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
January 9, 2017

When I saw the headline “Boris backs two-state solution,” I thought they were talking about dividing up the UK along racial lines.

Actually, I knew it was about Israel. However, whenever I hear a Western politician talking about a two-state solution, I remember the fact that these same people who are calling for our countries to be made into multi-racial warzones/rape-camps are also actively supporting racial segregation for the Jews.

During the campaign, they asked Trump about a two-state solution and he said he might support a one-state solution. The Jews of course flipped out about that, saying that the Palestinians deserve their own state. Well, in a one-state solution – that would be the entire Palestinian territory, including what is now called Israel, becoming a single state – the Palestinians would have their own country, because there are 15 million Palestinians in Israel, the West Bank and Gaza (plus 10 million in Jordan who would probably come back), so they would easily be able to outnumber the Jews in the government and rule as they want to rule.

The Jews were outraged not out of concern for the well-being of Palestinians, but out of fear of being overrun.

But we in America are told that we only have the option of a one-state solution. And if we are arguing that blacks should be separated and given their own land, we are attacked as evil racists. We could of course say “oh but we’re just afraid of the blacks being deprived of their right to a state,” but no one would believe us because we’re not Jews.

All that having been said, I think it is time to integrate the term “two-state solution” into the American political discourse.