Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
June 2, 2016
We are now being taken seriously.
And it isn’t because someone wrote a four-thousand word essay analyzing the minutia of traditionalist themes in some bit of pop culture. It’s because we built an army and we trolled the hell out of the Jews. We forced the media to pay attention to us. We forced the Jews to pay attention to us.
We forced our way into the collective consciousness of the masses.
Now they are all looking at us like, “who let you lot in here then, eh?”
The Yale Lawyer Jew Yishai Schwartz writes for Haaretz:
Jolted by Trump’s success, pundits are now engaged in a mad search for explanations of their predictive failure.
Recently, attention has centered on the online world of the “alternative right,” a particularly bizarre political and intellectual subculture. Most of that focus — and outrage — has been centered on the small army of “alt-right” Twitter activists who are busily tweeting images of Auschwitz uniforms and ovens images at Jewish journalists critical of Trump.
This is a reference to the Julia Ioffe operation.
That’s all you, boys.
The Stormer Troll Army.
This is scary stuff, but it is not clear how large, or how organized, this vitriolic rank and file actually is.
We are Legion.
Like most political classifications, the “alt-right” is amorphous. One way into exploring its positions is to focus on the movement’s leaders and its ideas. Unfortunately, this exploration is no more reassuring than the loud bigotry of its grassroots.
…
It describes a motley collection of libertarian activists, secular (and often vulgar) online video game aficionados, and traditional racists lamenting the decline of “white” culture, identity and pride. As might be expected, they don’t so much share a specific policy program as they do a temperament, a feeling of having been stifled by social mores that condemn certain ways of speaking about race or women or Jews.
The word you’re looking for is “reactionary.”
He then begins to cite his fellow Jews.
For he dare not speak the words “STORMER TROLL ARMY.”
Why not suggest that some races have higher IQs than other? (Or as alt-right inspiration Curtis Yarvin puts it, the thesis of “human neurological uniformity… has plenty of evidence against it.”)
Yarvin is Jew.
Why not assert Jewish dominance of the media and world financial system? (As Milo Yiannopoulos, an alt-right defender and writer for the conservative news site Breitbart, has done explicitly, albeit playfully.)
Yiannopoulos is Jew.
Although they operate only a tiny array of journals and institutes, the alt-right is increasingly portrayed as the intellectual vanguard of a much larger movement — the very movement that has buoyed Trump to the Republican nomination. And it is easy to see why: The focus on immigration and national pride, the rejection of civility norms, and the absence of a concrete political program are all eerily reminiscent of Trump himself. And so the concern from institutions like National Review, for decades the flagship journal of American conservatism, which has been ferocious in its condemnations.
They started a war.
We won.
It’s over.
This thing with Kristol and French is the last gasp.
When Beltway journalists suddenly gets worked up about a tiny group of self-described fringe intellectuals with no formal connection to actual political figures, it is important to keep perspective. President Donald J. Trump will not, in all likelihood, staff his administration with writers from Radix Journal or American Renaissance.
Correct.
He will staff his administration with writers from The Daily Stormer and The Right Stuff.
But it would also be a mistake to underestimate this particular phenomenon. Norms of civility and the limits of political respectability are fluid, and constantly reordered by social expectations. That alt-right figures view Trump as their champion, and then see him triumphant, emboldens them. That they watch Trump succeed in defiance of existing codes of conduct and ethnic sensitivity, emboldens them even further. And when prominent writers at one of the Right’s most popular media sources rally to their defense, we must worry that those whom President Trump would place in his administration might view these “racial realists” as worthy interlocutors rather than pariahs.
And there is a deeper reason why we must take this merry band of racists and agitators seriously: Intellectual narratives matter. And Jews sit at the center of the alt-right’s narrative of resentment.
Yep.
Modern American conservatism, far more than the American left, views itself as an intellectual movement.
…
The alt-right embraces this emphasis on intellectual history. In fact, they are obsessed with ideological labels and self-definitions as only pseudo-intellectuals can be. But while the alt-right accepts much of mainstream’s history, the morality is suddenly inverted: Buckley’s influence was enormous, but it was corrosive — particularly for his role in a pair of intellectual events: the ideological migration of the formerly liberal “neoconservatives,” and the marginalization of anti-Semites.
We have buried his legacy.
And it was the process of overcoming that legacy that made us great.
When this is all over, we will pour an entire bottle of vodka on his grave.
The cheapest vodka we can find. The kind that comes in a plastic bottle.
The alt-right’s well-documented rejection of liberalism, human equality and human rights is not just a rejection of inherent goods that Jews on the Right happened to have championed. (This would be bad enough.) Rather, it is a rejection justified in part by contempt for those very champions.
…
The “alternative” that the alt-right presents is, in large part, an alternative to acceptance of Jews. Its influence is still small. But during periods of immense social and political upheaval, when angry crowds are looking for leadership and for someone to give them a voice and validate their concerns, strange things happen. During such times, it is worth taking the threat posed by self-appointed intellectuals — no matter how banal, incoherent and anti-Semitic — seriously.
And there you have it.
To my knowledge, this is the first time a Jew has actually tried to understand what is going on – what we are actually doing with our cultural takeover. Previous attempts to analyze us have focused purely on name-calling.
This focused on the concept of a looming intellectual movement (which he associates with non-anti-Semitic organizations), which shows his inability to really grasp what is happening here; the mob is the movement. We don’t need intellectuals. Our ideology is much too simple and intuitive to need expounded upon in any further detail than it already has been. All we need is charismatic leadership.
Still, he tried to understand.
With this article, we see that the Jews are beginning to realize what is happening.
It’s an accomplishment worth celebrating.
I’ll just leave this here.
