Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
April 2, 2017
The most important thing to understand when discussing the Holocaust is that it didn’t actually happen. It is atrocity lie war propaganda on steroids that the Jews have continued to play-up after the war in order to support their deranged racial agenda.
The second most important thing to understand when discussing the Holocaust is that it should have happened.
The deputy director of a major Jewish organization criticized an assignment at a New York State high school asking students to role-play Nazis debating the Final Solution.
Etzion Neuer, of the Anti-Defamation League’s New York regional office, told The Algemeiner on Friday that though he does not believe that the teacher who assigned “Top Secret: Memorandum for Senior Nazi Party Members” — in which students were asked to simulate the debate that took place at the infamous Wannsee Conference and explain their “Nazi point of view” — was ill-intentioned, it was nevertheless “grossly inappropriate.”
Neuer said he learned of the lesson plan when a student contacted the ADL to “convey discomfort” at having to present an argument for the resolving the Jewish question — even though the assignment stated that “the point of this activity is not for you to be sympathetic” to the Nazis.
“Ultimately, this is an exercise on expanding your point of view by going outside your comfort zone and training your brain to logistically find the evidence necessary to prove a point, even if it is existentially and philosophically against what you believe,” it read.
Neuer said, “This exercise was less about Holocaust education and more about critical thinking, and that latter purpose is itself absolutely worthwhile, but there are so many controversial and worthwhile topics that could have been used instead of this.”
The class, which was part of a “Principles of Literary Representation” course offered through a countywide program that allows high school students to take college-level courses, was first reported on Thursday by local news site Syracuse.com. According to the report, two students were “disturbed” and felt “weird” when teacher Michael DeNobile “randomly assigned half the students to argue for, and half to argue against the extermination of Jews.”
One of the students said she overheard a classmate expressing disappointment at having been assigned to the opposition.
HAHA!
Aron Hier, director of campus outreach at the Simon Wiesenthal Center, told The Algemeiner, “The school has responsibility to decry and repudiate this. I don’t think this is a fair modality or dialectic for teaching.”
“Notwithstanding first amendment protections, the school must decry it and call it for what it is: an act of antisemitism,” Hier added. “This is not about censoring the program, but to say, ‘In our humble opinion, this was unacceptable.’ The teacher should apologize, and the school should host an educational program showing the depravity and barbarism of the Final Solution, and how it affected millions of people.”
It isn’t an “act of anti-Semitism.”
It’s just a school debate assignment. Calling anything that even relates to Jews “anti-Semitism” is an idiotic strategy, bound to end up with massive backlash. We saw this with PewDiePie.
The reason the Jews are afraid of this is that they don’t want people looking into the actual arguments that the Germans were using against Jews. They don’t want anyone to know those arguments, because they are obviously true on the face of them.
Though the “Holocaust” is a hoax, NS German prejudice against Jews obviously isn’t, and they did send these people to concentration camps. Their reasoning for this had to do with the corrosive, destructive role Jews were playing in German society, particularly after having established a poverty-ridden communist-Jew caliphate in the post-WWI Weimar Republic. They were sucking the blood of Germans. This is just factual information, and it is the only way that scholars are able to accept the idea that Jews were exterminated – because what the Jews were up to was so extreme, that it makes perfect sense someone would want to exterminate them.
My Debate Test?
As someone who is solidly pro-Holocaust, I am trying to think of how I would defend not doing the Holocaust.
You definitely couldn’t come at it from “Jews deserve to live because they provide x to society and the world.”
It would have to be a moral abstraction (AKA a Jewish argument), such as “all things have a right to live.” That of course doesn’t really hold up, because it becomes a type of animal rights argument, which never make any coherent sense because all animals eat other animals. Then it’s “all humans have a right to live” I guess. Although one would run into problems defining Jews as “human” if they were up against a skilled pro-Holocaust debater.
You could also argue against the “all humans have a right to live” argument with a Socratic thing of: the only reason people shouldn’t be killed is that suffering is wrong, but if killing someone reduces suffering of others than killing is right.
This is the other reason why Jews are no doubt against this assignment: it is impossible to defend not Holocausting them.
