Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
February 5, 2014
Last week on Holocaust Day, the Jews of the EU came out sobbed about how not enough countries had passed laws which fully criminalize the denial of the Holocaust.
From Naharnet:
Though the bloc agreed in 2008 to outlaw the denial, condonement or gross trivialization of such crimes, around half of its 28 members have failed to write these rules into their domestic legislation, the European Commission said.
“Today, we have achieved peace between nations in the European Union,” said the bloc’s Justice Commissioner Viviane Reding.
“Yet another challenge remains: to continue the quest for tolerance. Nobody should ever have to experience hate speech or hate crime.”
Reding said she was urging all EU states to swiftly transpose EU rules into their national laws.
Countries not in line with the 2008 rules by December 1 this year could face judicial action.
The Commission said 13 countries — Austria, Belgium, Britain, Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Estonia, Finland, Greece, Ireland, Hungary, the Netherlands and Sweden — have no criminal law provisions governing the public condoning, denial and gross trivialization of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes.
And 15 nations — Bulgaria, Britain, Croatia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Malta, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain and Sweden — have no specific provisions criminalizing public condoning, denial and gross trivialization of crimes against peace, war crimes and crimes against humanity by major war criminals of the European Axis countries.
In a separate statement, EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton said Holocaust Remembrance Day was an occasion “to remind us all of the need to continue fighting prejudice and racism in our own time.”
“We must remain vigilant against the dangers of hate speech and redouble our commitment to prevent any form of intolerance,” she added.
Who among you is capable of watching the way these Jews squirm about how people’s basic human rights should be stripped if they dare question an alleged historical event – for which no physical evidence exists to confirm – and not see the obvious fact that they made it up?
Imagine, if you will, if your brother was murdered, and someone began giving speeches saying “no, your brother was not murdered, and I don’t believe he actually existed.” Would you demand this person go to prison for denying the tragic death of your brother, while at the same time denying him a right to see the evidence surrounding the murder? Or would you simply make your own public statements – maybe challenge him to a debate even – and show the documented evidence: first confirm his existence with public records, then demonstrate he was murdered with police reports, showing the murder weapon, showing the remains, etc?
If you did all of this, and the man still went around telling people that he never died because he never existed, would you then want him put in prison? Or would you simply dismiss him as insane, and go on with your life?
It seems to me this is not a particularly difficult question to answer. And yet the Jews first refuse to present evidence of this alleged Holocaust, deny people a right to go to the sites and find evidence, and then claim that anyone who doesn’t believe is a criminal.
They are giving the game away. But what else can they do? If they don’t stop people from questioning it, in another 5 or 10 years, everyone is going to know the truth.
The Holy Hoaxers have backed themselves against a wall.
Those who know the truth – and have the balls to say it – now hold all the cards.
