Former Judge Says Women Must Stop Getting So Drunk if They Want Rape Conviction Statistics to Improve

Sven Longshanks
Daily Stormer
August 28, 2014

What this female judge is saying is just basic common sense. What kind of jury is going to accept evidence from a witness who cant remember what she actually said, because she had drunk 10 tequila slammers that night?

Independent:

A former judge has claimed rape conviction statistics will not improve until women “stop getting so drunk”.

Retired judge Mary Jane Mowat said it is an inevitable fact of being “one person’s word against another” during rape trials, of which the national conviction rate of cases that go to trial currently sits at 60 per cent.

She told the Oxford Mail conviction rate will not improve unless women stop drinking so heavily.

Judge Mowat, who retired this month, said: “It is an inevitable fact of it being one person’s word against another, and the burden of proof being that you have to be sure before you convict.

“I will also say, and I will be pilloried for saying so, butthe rape conviction statistics will not improve until women stop getting so drunk.

“I’m not saying it’s right to rape a drunken woman, I’m not saying for a moment that it’s allowable to take advantage of a drunken woman.

“But a jury in a position where they’ve got a woman who says ‘I was absolutely off my head, I can’t really remember what I was doing, I can’t remember what I said, I can’t remember if I consented or not but I know I wouldn’t have done’. I mean when a jury is faced with something like that, how are they supposed to react?”

Since replacing 10% of Sweden’s native people with Non-Whites, Sweden now has the highest amount of rape in Europe. It has just been revealed that 1,400 women and children have been raped by Non-Whites in just one town in Britain. One White woman is raped by a Non-White every fifteen minutes in America and that is just the ones that get reported.

Clearly, the most effective way to reduce the amount of rapes in a country is to reduce the Non-White population.

Don’t expect any judges to say that though, as that would be ‘racist’.